「models」の検索結果

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For choosing attribution models, comparing multi-touch/MMM/incrementality, or reconciling conflicting numbers across tools, see attribution. For A/B test measurement, see ab-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents, study design, and claim–statistic relationships while checking equations, numbers, quotations, and citations against the source. Use to clarify exposition or de-jargonize a technical draft; not to rewrite briefs or doctrinal arguments. Produces an edited draft and audit memo. Full integrity checks and original-format rendering require suitable extraction, code execution, and document tools; otherwise provides proposed edits with verification limits disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for comprehensive Spreadsheet reading, creation, editing, and analysis with visual quality control. Use to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing tabular data, (3) Modifying existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Building financial models with proper formatting, (5) Data visualization with in-sheet charts, or any other spreadsheet tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a teacher think-aloud that models historical thinking strategies with a specific document. Use when planning explicit strategy instruction or when students follow a protocol without understanding the underlying reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze images, video, speech, motion, products, and websites; route local vision, audio, depth, tracking, matting, identity, and restoration models; auto-edit, replicate, enhance, caption, voice, assemble, annotate, validate, and export editable Timeline Studio projects and videos. Use for reference-video remakes, filter and repeated-shot reconstruction, subject-aware reframing, clip splitting, source-time speed curves, Color Wheels grading, ramps and holds, person or product cutout, person or object outline, authorized face swap, shot and timing reconstruction, timeline markers, chapters, beat cues, review notes and ranges, supplied or web-sourced footage, AI video platform selection, cleanup, highlights, product promotion, website walkthroughs, image-to-video assisted edits, optical-flow editing, depth-assisted relighting, grayscale depth-video conversion, depth/2.5D/transition finishing, AI voiceover, subtitles, short-form production, .timeline automation, or editor evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal Runtime best practices for PyTorch inference, Transformers models, and FastAPI serving. Covers device management, model loading, memory optimization, and performance tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configuration module patterns for LlamaFarm. Covers Pydantic v2 models, JSONSchema generation, YAML processing, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unit economics analysis for China-focused portfolio companies. Adapted from the original unit-economics skill for Chinese business models, pricing, and market dynamics. Triggers on "A股单位经济模型", "单元经济模型", "unit economics China", "unit economics [company]", "LTV/CAC China", or "Cohort analysis [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-statement financial model for A-share stocks. Adapts the standard 3-statement-model methodology for Chinese accounting standards (CAS), Chinese GAAP differences, and AkShare-sourced financials. Use instead of the original 3-statement-model skill when building integrated IS/BS/CF models for Chinese listed companies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit financial models and Excel workbooks for A-share analysis. Adapts the original audit-xls skill for Chinese financial modeling standards, CAS conventions, and A-share-specific checks. Triggers on "A股模型审计", "财务模型核查", "audit model China", "audit xlsx", "模型QC", or "check model [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Roll forward A-share financial models for new periods. Adapts the original roll-forward skill for Chinese financial statements, CAS conventions, and A-share reporting calendars. Triggers on "A股模型滚动", "模型更新", "roll forward model China", "roll forward", "更新财务模型", or "project [company] [period]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update A-share financial models with new quarterly data, management guidance, or macro changes. Reflects actuals, rolls estimates forward, flags material changes, and updates valuation. Adapted from the original model-update skill for Chinese market conventions and AkShare data. Triggers on "A股模型更新", "模型更新", "plug earnings into model", "update model for [company]", "刷新预测", or "更新财务模型".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Ideogram 4 (Ideogram Ultra) txt2img and img2img workflows with the local open-weights model, dual conditional/unconditional models with DualModelGuider, Qwen3-VL text encoder, and structured JSON ("compositional deconstruction") prompts for strong text rendering and layout control

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover Civitai models with the BUILT-IN download_model action:"search_civitai" and install/generate them locally. Find a checkpoint/LoRA/embedding on Civitai, download it into ComfyUI, and use its trigger words. Optionally pair the official Civitai MCP for community features (images browsing, posting, collections).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Lightricks LTX-2 / LTX-2.3 video workflows covering text-to-video, image-to-video, GGUF and bundled checkpoints, distilled model, camera control LoRAs, synchronized audio, two-stage upscaling, and swapping alternate/GGUF base models

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curated download URLs and target directories, organized by family (Flux, WAN, LTX, Qwen, Z-Image, SD15/SDXL), for every model the comfyui-mcp skills reference, covering checkpoints, VAEs, text encoders, and LoRAs. Use when downloading models with download_model (action:"download" / action:"download_civitai"), when a workflow fails with a missing-model error, or when setting up a new machine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。