「qa」の検索結果

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

自動運転モードで東京の街を走らせて画面を撮り、日本の道路交通法・道路標識令・設置基準に照らして おかしなところ（標識の向きや位置、区画線、信号、車線、速度、歩行者の動き、違反判定の誤り）を 見つけて直すループ。「AI で画面を判定して直す」「道路の見た目を法令どおりにチェック」と頼まれたとき、 または /loop で繰り返し実行するときに使う。

AI-driven Flutter E2E testing via VM Service CLI. Control running Flutter apps in debug mode for smoke tests, regression checks, exploratory testing, and UI automation. Trigger when user mentions E2E testing, UI automation, smoke tests, integration testing, test automation, controlling Flutter apps, VM Service interaction, debugging UI flows, automated regression testing, CI sanity checks, or testing native dialogs/permissions/WebViews. Supports stateful named instances or stateless direct URI connections. Ideal for rapid test feedback, AI agent workflows, element discovery, screenshot capture, log collection, and scriptable UI interactions (tap, scroll, enterText). Use for troubleshooting flaky tests, automating repetitive manual tests, verifying app behavior after merges, or setting up automated QA pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, harden, and test the safety policy for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for approval gates, blocked mixer operations, hazardous request handling, venue validation, bypass attempts, QA, risk review, or follow-up safety changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review FriendlyBet quality, regression risk, test plans, release readiness, version bump discipline, scoring/locking correctness, provider fallback behavior, and dirty-worktree safety. Use before shipping app code, scoring changes, migrations, sports integrations, copy updates, PWA cache changes, or any risky user-facing flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory QA of web apps: find bugs, evidence, reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microsoft AI, Cloud, Productivity, Computing, Gaming & Apps Explore Microsoft products and servi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NVIDIA NeMo Retriever deployment and usage guidance for local retrieval services, corpus ingestion, and grounded question-answering workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a `.pptx` file is involved as input, output, or both. Covers reading decks, editing existing presentations, creating slides from scratch, visual QA, notes, layouts, and presentation-safe file transforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification methodology and gate checklist for the tdmcp Connectors Directory submission — run the docs build, build and inspect the .mcpb bundle, sweep for stale .dxt references, and cross-check the form-answer draft against the real requirements. Use to validate the submission package before a human submits, by executing commands and quoting evidence, not by trusting that work was done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Release tdmcp: write the Keep-a-Changelog entry, bump the SemVer version across every manifest, then (autonomously, per project policy) commit, tag, and push — gated on a td-qa PASS, with hard git safety rails. Use when releasing/shipping/cutting a tdmcp version, writing the CHANGELOG, bumping the version, or tagging a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the dedicated Kinect wall harp implementation team. Use whenever the user asks to build, implement, continue, fix, QA, document, or ship the Kinect wall harp, Kinect v2 wall-depth harp, FreenectTD depth-blob hand tracking, projected wall strings, pluck synth harp, or this feature's Layer 1 tool/recipe/docs. Use this before the generic tdmcp-pipeline for this feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a whole tdmcp feature BACKLOG to completion as resumable, wave-by-wave releases — the campaign layer ABOVE tdmcp-pipeline/tdmcp-feature-lead. Use whenever the user wants to implement an ENTIRE backlog or discovery file (e.g. _workspace/discovery*/FEATURE_BACKLOG*.md), 'all the features', many features across multiple releases, or a long autonomous build campaign, AND for every follow-up: continue/resume the campaign, run the next wave, re-run a failed wave, fold in QA results, or check campaign status. Backed by a ledger.json so re-running is idempotent (skips shipped work, resumes interrupted work) and resilient (retry-once then quarantine-and-continue). For a SINGLE feature or one small batch, use tdmcp-pipeline instead; this skill is for the whole ledger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Updates tdmcp docs and roadmap for newly shipped or newly merged capabilities. Use when asked to update docs, update the roadmap, reconcile release docs, document new features, sync docs with CHANGELOG/package release, refresh cookbook examples after a feature wave, re-run/continue/fix a docs-roadmap pass, or check whether docs/ROADMAP.md is current. Runs a sub-agent workflow: release audit -> roadmap/docs edit + cookbook sync -> QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding WHERE to do work on Syntropic137 itself - "run this through Syntropic", "dispatch a workflow", "should this go in a workspace or local", "kick off a run on the Mini", "dogfood this", "build Syntropic inside Syntropic", "why did the agent's push fail", "can an agent run our QA", "the execution says completed but nothing shipped". Covers what a workspace agent can and cannot do, why `.github/workflows` pushes must come from the local machine, how to write a task prompt that does not repeat a known failure, and how to verify a run actually delivered. Do NOT use for PR/release mechanics (see `devops`), for using the `syn` CLI as an end user (see the syntropic137 plugin skills), or for authoring workflow YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for any ticket that touches a Supabase RPC, edge function, or TypeScript client function in src/lib/. Ensures both caller and callee are verified before state:ready-for-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for any ticket that changes React components, user-facing flows, or UI state. Ensures all five observable UI states are verified before state:ready-for-qa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: remote team, delegate, delegated lane, delegated implementation, delegated QA, or non-sensitive ticket routing to the remote team's implementation lane.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。