Report a problem with the open-pr plugin itself, or ask for a change, on its public issue tracker. Use when a run of one of its commands left something to say. Takes no URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,546 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Report a problem with the open-pr plugin itself, or ask for a change, on its public issue tracker. Use when a run of one of its commands left something to say. Takes no URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or refine depth through elevation systems, raised and inset surfaces, layered overlap, and meaningful shadow behavior so interfaces feel structured instead of flat. Use when the user mentions depth, elevation, shadows, layering, flat cards, pressed states, drag feedback, or inset controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a hover/press effect", "animate a toggle or switch", "build an animated like button", "make a toast/snackbar slide in", "animate a drawer or modal", "animate list reordering or add/remove", "do a shared-element layout transition", or "polish UI feedback". Covers UI motion with Framer Motion (motion/react) and modern CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户观察到某个力量/趋势/行为过度亢盛需要引入制衡时; 当系统出现"越用力越糟糕"的过冲现象时; 当需要设计自我调节机制防止系统走向极端时; 当用户说"物极必反"或"用力过猛反而坏事"时。 不适用于: 需要持续单向推进不需要制衡的场景(如创业初期的全力冲刺); 问题本身就是力量不足而非亢盛的场景。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search, post, monitor, and archive on Twitter/X via five tools: the official hosted X MCP server (full-archive search, trends, bookmarks, Articles via xurl bridge), x-search CLI (cost-tracked API v2 research with calendar-day windows, volume counts, multi-query fan-out, feeds, watchlists, posting), xurl (official CLI for any endpoint incl. media/DMs), bird CLI (free session-based reads/writes, frozen at 0.8.0), and Smaug bookmark archival. Triggers on: search tweets, tweets from today, what did X tweet, latest tweets from, tweet volume, expand a Twitter query, check Twitter for, post a tweet, tweet this, post to X, reply on Twitter, full-archive search, what's trending, check mentions, my mentions, timeline, DMs, monitor account, research topic on Twitter, my bookmarks, archive bookmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Boot and drive the tbh-meter app + reader locally to see a change working — what runs on macOS (UI only; the reader is win32-only) and how to feed the overlay/list fake data. Use when asked to run/start the meter, verify a change in the running app, screenshot the overlay, or reproduce a bug locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardized commit + PR workflow for tbh-meter. Analyzes changes, makes conventional commits (subjects feed the release changelog), and for any overlay/UI change captures a seed-driven screenshot to attach to the PR. Use when asked to commit, open a PR, or "commit this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and maintain a product or project backlog with prioritized items, acceptance criteria, and estimates. Covers user story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, backlog grooming, item splitting, and status tracking. Use when starting a new project and converting scope into actionable items, during ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback or scope changes, or splitting oversized items into implementable pieces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct structured insect behavior observations using sampling protocols, ethogram categories, event recording, interaction logging, environmental context, and summary analysis. Covers focal animal sampling, scan sampling, all-occurrences sampling, and instantaneous sampling methods. Defines a standard insect ethogram with locomotion, feeding, grooming, mating, defense, communication, and rest categories. Includes timestamped event recording, intraspecific and interspecific interaction logging, environmental covariate documentation, and time budget analysis. Use when studying insect behavior for ecological research, documenting behavioral repertoires for a species, observing pollinator activity or predator-prey dynamics, or supporting conservation assessments with behavioral data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evolve an existing team composition by refining its structure in-place or creating a specialized variant. Covers assessing the current team against template and coordination patterns, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (adjust members, change coordination pattern, split/merge teams), applying changes to the team file and CONFIG block, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a team's member roster is outdated, coordination pattern no longer fits, user feedback reveals workflow gaps, a specialized variant is needed alongside the original, or agents have been added or removed from the library affecting team composition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and compare levitation mechanisms for a given application through a structured trade study. Covers magnetic (passive diamagnetic, active feedback, superconducting), acoustic (standing wave, phased array), aerodynamic (hovercraft, air bearings, Coanda effect), and electrostatic (Coulomb suspension, ion traps) mechanisms. Use when selecting the most appropriate levitation approach for transport, sample handling, display, bearings, or precision measurement applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify gate call variants in a minified JavaScript bundle. Covers context-window extraction around a flag occurrence, identification of 4–6 reader variants (sync boolean, sync config-object, bootstrap-aware TTL, truthy-only, async bootstrap, async bridge), default-value extraction (boolean / null / numeric / config-object literal), conjunction detection across `&&` predicates, kill-switch inversion detection, and production of a gate-mechanics record that feeds probe- feature-flag-state. Use when a flag's behavior cannot be inferred from its name alone, when the binary uses multiple reader libraries, or when config-object gates carry structured schemas distinct from boolean gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage pull requests using GitHub CLI. Covers branch preparation, writing PR titles and descriptions, creating PRs, handling review feedback, and merge/cleanup workflows. Use when proposing changes from a feature or fix branch for review, merging completed work into the main branch, requesting code review from collaborators, or documenting the purpose and scope of a set of changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply collective intelligence coordination patterns — stigmergy, local rules, and quorum sensing — to organize distributed systems, teams, or workflows without centralized control. Covers signal design, agent autonomy boundaries, emergent behavior cultivation, and feedback loop tuning. Use when designing distributed systems without a coordination bottleneck, organizing teams that must self-coordinate, building event-driven architectures with shared state communication, or replacing fragile centralized orchestration with resilient emergent coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI internal coordination using stigmergic signals — managing information freshness in context and memory, decay rates for assumption staleness, and emergent coherent behavior from simple local protocols. Use during complex tasks where multiple sub-tasks must coordinate, when context has grown long and information freshness is uncertain, after context compression when information may have been lost, or when sub-task outputs need to feed into each other cleanly without degradation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。