1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
Create new skills with proper structure, compliance checks, and registration. Use when asked to create a skill, build a new skill, or scaffold a skill template. Enforces mk: prefix, sub-agents.md structure, and context engineering principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until confirmed, then give a verdict with trade-offs and a checklist. Not for options or debate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates an approved plan against 8 dimensions before Phase 3 begins. Catches incomplete acceptance criteria, missing dependencies, and unresolved risks. Use after Gate 1 approval and before Phase 2 (Test). Produces a validation report with pass/fail per dimension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. Use AFTER a plan exists. For validating the idea itself before planning, use /mk:office-hours first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve an in-progress git merge or rebase conflict end to end: read the conflict state, recover each side's original intent, resolve every hunk, run the project's checks, and prepare the merge/rebase for an explicitly approved finish. Use when asked to "resolve merge conflicts", "fix this rebase", "finish the merge", or when `git status` shows conflicted (unmerged) paths. NOT for the full ship pipeline that merges the base branch first (see mk:ship); NOT for debugging a runtime bug or test failure unrelated to a conflict (see mk:investigate / mk:fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial analysis, scope-aware dispatch, adversarial persona passes, and forced-finding protocol. Supports input modes: branch diff (default), PR number (#123), commit hash, pending changes (--pending). Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", "check my diff", or "review #123". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. NOT for behavioral verification against a running build (see mk:evaluate); NOT for post-implementation simplification (see mk:simplify).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JIRA custom field discovery + configuration via the jira-as wrapper. Triggers: 'field ID for X', 'list custom fields', 'check fields for project PROJ', 'configure agile fields for board'. Read ops are open; create/configure-agile require admin. NOT for setting per-issue field values (mk:jira-issue update).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate Jira ticket complexity + inconsistencies via the jira-evaluator agent. Read-only. Triggers: 'evaluate KEY', 'analyze ticket complexity for KEY', 'check ticket quality for KEY'. NOT for estimation (mk:jira-estimator); NOT for full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a GitHub PR with a single shallow correctness/security/breaking/AI-slop checklist and emits a verdict; optionally posts it via gh pr review. Use to review an external or teammate PR. NOT for deep pre-landing audit of your own diff (see mk:review); NOT for responding to received review comments (see mk:respond-pr).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ticket/PRD intake: product area classification, completeness scoring, RCA, technical assessment. Works with Jira (via mk:jira-issue / jira-as), Linear (via MCP), GitHub (via gh CLI), or manual paste. Triggers: 'analyze ticket', 'intake PRD', 'triage issue', 'classify ticket', 'check ticket'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing UI components, reviewing visual design, building design systems, or checking accessibility. Auto-activates on frontend design tasks and UI reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement backend service changes: API contracts, service boundaries, auth integration, reliability and delivery checks. Use for backend/API handlers, services, webhooks, jobs, or backend architecture changes. Routes schema/migrations to mk:database; security review to the existing security workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use RoutIR — call a running endpoint with the client, stand up a local server that mixes locally-hosted services with services proxied from a remote master server, and extend RoutIR with new bi-encoders, rerankers, and document collections by writing a small config (and optionally one Python file referenced via `file_imports`). No checkout of the routir source is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use ONLY when explicitly invoked. Puts Fusionaly on a Linux server you reach over SSH with a key. Optionally creates a Hetzner server and the Cloudflare DNS record. The user runs the one interactive install command; the agent prepares and checks everything around it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DraftForge PR lifecycle workflow. Use when the user runs /pr, opens or pushes a pull request, or asks to monitor CI checks and Copilot review on a branch. Creates the PR (or reuses an existing one), polls GitHub Actions and Copilot up to ~15 min, then analyses CI failures and Copilot comments and reports findings grouped by file and skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show system status and health checks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish package to npm registry with pre-checks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch Claude Code official documentation. Use when updating local reference docs or checking official spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan the repository for hardcoded secrets, exposed API keys, insecure network configurations, and vulnerable dependencies. Use when the user asks for a security audit, secret detection, credential scan, vulnerability check, or wants to find leaked tokens in the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review approved Grafana business-intelligence evidence for revenue, conversion, and operational KPIs. Use for bounded KPI scorecards, financial or operational metric checks, baseline comparisons, and business-unit reviews without changing source systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。