「nes」の検索結果

Comprehensive code review guidelines for iOS/Swift covering architecture, performance, security, and best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement, review, or improve SwiftUI features using the iOS 26+ Liquid Glass API. Use when asked to adopt Liquid Glass in new SwiftUI UI, refactor an existing feature to Liquid Glass, or review Liquid Glass usage for correctness, performance, and design alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Swift Package Manager dependencies, package plugins, module variants, and CI-oriented build overhead that slow Xcode builds. Use when a developer suspects packages, plugins, or dependency graph shape are hurting clean or incremental build performance, mentions SPM slowness, package resolution time, build plugin overhead, duplicate module builds from configuration drift, circular dependencies between modules, oversized modules needing splitting, or modularization best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Current attested Codex, Claude Code, and Agent Skills extension contracts for skilltap. Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, or documenting harness adapters; plugin or marketplace manifests; native plugin lifecycle; skill directories or SKILL.md frontmatter; AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md bridges; configuration scopes; compatibility transfer; adoption, reconciliation, status, or update behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use skilltap when setting up, inspecting, reconciling, or troubleshooting supported local agent harnesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform transcripts, conversations, or raw notes into shareable content — either multiple social posts OR a single long-form article. Learns style from user's published content. Handles transcripts of any length (tested up to 5500+ lines / 90+ min). Use when user: (1) provides transcript/conversation/recording and wants social content, (2) asks to "turn recording/notes into posts", (3) mentions generating content from recordings/notes, (4) needs multiple publishable pieces from single source, (5) asks to write an article from a transcript — e.g. "write an article/long-form", "organize into an article", "write up this session", "turn this talk into a blog post", "deep dive". Social mode outputs 2-15 ready-to-publish pieces. Article mode outputs a structured long-form piece (3000-10000+ chars) written section-by-section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual testing + bug filing for Enterprise / SaaS products. Parses a Feishu test doc (scope + repo + bitable URL), observes staging via claude-in-chrome, captures DOM/console/network/screenshot evidence, then dual-tracks each finding — Feishu Bitable record (with attachments) + GitHub issue (<REPO>#<ISSUE_NUMBER> format — English-primary, Chinese collapsed, R2-hosted screenshots, matching type label). Enforces dedup across bitable + GitHub issues + PRs, and mandatory P0/P1/P2 priority prompt when unclear. Trigger whenever the user says "test and report", "test and report side-by-side", "start system testing", "experience staging", "collaborate on bug filing", "collect feedback", a shared Feishu testing doc, a bitable URL + finding, or any UX/bug needing both bitable + GitHub tracking. Do NOT use for writing product code, PR review, CI debugging, or general "how do I use this product" questions — those go to normal dev / PR-review / support flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discuss a community-edition product requirement with the user, draft a bilingual (Chinese + English) PRD for review, then — after explicit user approval — create the English-only issue on GitHub (<OWNER/REPO>). Use whenever the user wants to turn a requirement (from a Feishu doc, a meeting note, a customer ask, or a rough idea) into a GitHub issue. Triggers on phrases like "create requirement doc", "create a requirement", "put this requirement on GitHub", "create new feature issue", "draft an issue for...", or anytime the user describes a product feature/improvement they want tracked. The format is opinionated (Background / Goal / Spec / Verification / Related, NO implementation details, draft shown bilingually for human review, issue itself written in English only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates IEEE-format LaTeX technical reports from project requirements and codebase evidence, using academic prose, pseudocode-only explanations, BibTeX references, and IEEEtran formatting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews existing UI components for design-system consistency, states, responsiveness and accessibility using consumer-owned context. Use when asked to review component quality, check design-system adherence or audit component consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits UI layout, overflow and navigation across product-defined viewports using consumer context and browser tools. Use when asked to check responsiveness, test mobile layout or audit breakpoint behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为某个事件设计"可玩的情节图"——由若干情节 beat（旁白/独白/对话/选择点）与带解锁条件的有向边组成，effects 是唯一写状态处，按严格 JSON 模板写入 /project/scenes/<event_id>.json。当需要生成或修订某个事件的内部情节时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting a bug or defect ticket, reviewing one someone else wrote, or deciding whether a reported problem is ready to file. Keeps what the reporter actually saw separate from what the agent later found out, so a reader can tell which lines are testimony and which are collected proof. Trigger phrases: 'file a bug', 'write up this defect', 'triage this report', 'is this ticket ready to file', 'what did the reporter actually see'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VibeFarsi blocks/templates/sites: production-level assembly, responsiveness and content. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing vibefarsi blocks/templates/sites for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and configure WorkOS AuthKit authentication with Convex backend. Use when integrating AuthKit, configuring JWT providers, setting up environment variables, or implementing sign in and sign out flows with React and Vite. Supports Netlify deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deploying this teleprompt app with get-convex/static-hosting, especially when the user says /deploydev, /deployprod, deploy dev, deploy prod, deploy production, upload static hosting, or asks which Convex static-hosting command to run. Keeps dev uploads on fearless-dolphin-422 and production uploads on befitting-dodo-95.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing style guide for technical content, social media, blog posts, READMEs, git commits, and developer documentation. Optimized to avoid AI detection patterns. Use when writing any content beyond code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug and troubleshoot WorkOS AuthKit authentication issues with Convex. Use when authentication fails, JWT validation errors occur, user identity returns null, email claims are missing, admin access checks fail, or sign in button does not work. Supports Netlify deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up Convex auth, identity mapping, and access control. Use for login, auth providers, users tables, protected functions, or roles in a Convex app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans Convex schema and data migrations with widen-migrate-narrow and @convex-dev/migrations. Use for breaking schema changes, backfills, table reshaping, or zero-downtime rollouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflection-first problem solving methodology for Convex development. Use before implementing any solution to ensure proper root cause analysis, 98% code confidence, and minimal change scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve interface resilience through better error handling, i18n support, text overflow handling, and edge case management. Makes interfaces robust and production-ready. Use when the user asks to harden, make production-ready, handle edge cases, add error states, or fix overflow and i18n issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。