「gui」の検索結果

Create or refresh screenshot-led product hero images, localized interface captures, and image-led README sections for GitHub repositories. Use whenever a user asks to make a GitHub README show a GUI product visually, add software screenshots, design a README hero image, reproduce a screenshot-collage reference, or prepare repository-bound visual documentation. For GUI applications, default to the deterministic product-proof split hero with real software screenshots unless the user explicitly requests another visual direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

生成横向翻页网页 PPT（单 HTML 文件），含 WebGL 背景、章节幕封、数据大字报、图片网格等模板。提供两种风格：① "电子杂志 × 电子墨水"（衬线 + 流体背景 + 暖色） ② "瑞士国际主义"（无衬线 + 网格点阵 + IKB/柠檬黄/柠檬绿/安全橙高亮）。也支持生成多平台封面（公众号 21:9、Facebook 1.91:1、Instagram 1:1/9:16、LINE 16:9、YouTube 缩图、LinkedIn 横幅等）。当用户需要制作分享 / 演讲 / 发布会风格的网页 PPT，或提到"杂志风 PPT"、"瑞士风 PPT"、"Swiss Style"、"horizontal swipe deck"、"封面"、"cover"、"Facebook 封面"、"LINE 封面"、"Instagram 封面"时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Guizang-style social cards, Xiaohongshu carousels, 3:4 covers, and WeChat 21:9 plus 1:1 cover pairs from articles, scripts, screenshots, notes, subtitles, or photos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for creating professional UI/UX designs in Penpot using MCP tools. Use this skill when: (1) Creating new UI/UX designs for web, mobile, or desktop applications, (2) Building design systems with components and tokens, (3) Designing dashboards, forms, navigation, or landing pages, (4) Applying accessibility standards and best practices, (5) Following platform guidelines (iOS, Android, Material Design), (6) Reviewing or improving existing Penpot designs for usability. Triggers: "design a UI", "create interface", "build layout", "design dashboard", "create form", "design landing page", "make it accessible", "design system", "component library".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing quality guidelines, formatting conventions, and styling constraints for documentation. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or auditing documentation files, READMEs, markdown files, or guides. - Modifying files with suffixes like: *.md, *.qmd, *.txt, *.rst. - Prompt contains keywords: doc, documentation, spelling, grammar, headers, links, table alignment, Divio, tone, voice, clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the operator asks for an authoring-time complexity hint or a complexity guide preview before commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for when to use and when not to use return validators in Convex functions. Use this skill whenever the user is writing Convex queries, mutations, or actions and needs guidance on return value validation. Also trigger when the user asks about Convex type safety, runtime validation, AI-generated Convex code, Convex AI rules, Convex security best practices, or when they're debugging return type issues in Convex functions. Trigger this skill when users mention "validators", "returns", "return type", or "exact types" in the context of Convex development. Also trigger when writing or reviewing Convex AI rules or prompts that instruct LLMs how to write Convex code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for when to use and when not to use return validators in Convex functions. Use this skill whenever the user is writing Convex queries, mutations, or actions and needs guidance on return value validation. Also trigger when the user asks about Convex type safety, runtime validation, AI-generated Convex code, Convex AI rules, Convex security best practices, or when they're debugging return type issues in Convex functions. Trigger this skill when users mention "validators", "returns", "return type", or "exact types" in the context of Convex development. Also trigger when writing or reviewing Convex AI rules or prompts that instruct LLMs how to write Convex code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for instrumenting webapps with Azure Application Insights. Provides telemetry patterns, SDK setup, and configuration references. WHEN: how to instrument app, App Insights SDK, telemetry patterns, what is App Insights, Application Insights guidance, instrumentation examples, APM best prac...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance on Apple Human Interface Guidelines (HIG). Covers iOS, macOS, and visionOS with 2026 Liquid Glass aesthetics and accessibility-first design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for instrumenting webapps with Azure Application Insights. Provides telemetry patterns, SDK setup, and configuration references. USE FOR: how to instrument app, App Insights SDK, telemetry patterns, what is App Insights, Application Insights guidance, instrumentation examples, APM...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credib...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines. Use at project start to establish code quality, testing standards, and architectural constraints that guide all development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a live investigation as an operator-driven query loop: the operator runs each query on the live system and pastes the result back, and you guide the investigation one labelled query at a time. Use alongside support-assist (which covers what to investigate) whenever someone is pasting query or command output back from a deployment, especially during an incident. Covers labelling, pacing, making each query decide the next step, version-grounding, and keeping queries cheap and correctly classified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when developing code using Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology. Use this skill when the user wants to write tests first before implementation, needs guidance on the red-green-refactor cycle, or explicitly requests TDD-style development. Triggers include requests like "develop this feature using TDD", "write tests first", "help me with test-driven development", or "implement this following TDD practices". The skill guides through writing failing tests, implementing minimal code to pass, and refactoring while maintaining test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for maritime safety and class rules: SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2024 (IH110E) as the paywalled statutory core, ISM Code & Guidelines 2018 (ID117E), ISPS Code 2003 (K116E) and the 2021 guide (IB116E), and COLREGS 2026 (IC904E), with designation, edition, owner, status, and official URL only. Contains no source content. Free-path layers are US flag implementation (eCFR Title 46 and USCG circulars), the USCG Navigation Rules PDF, UK MCA notices under Open Government Licence v3.0, and class portals (DNV, ABS, Bureau Veritas). None of those layers is the IMO consolidated text. No in-repo pack covers these instruments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstructed reference notes on US FDA medical-device software regulation, built from seven public-domain FDA sources (the QMSR final rule 89 FR 7496, FDA device software guidance documents, and the eSTAR program page; pinned 2026-10-12). Use for regulatory pathways and premarket submissions (510(k), De Novo, PMA, eSTAR), premarket software documentation levels (Basic or Enhanced), software validation and Computer Software Assurance, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR, 21 CFR 820), medical-device cybersecurity (secure product development, SBOMs, FD&C Act section 524B, labelling), clinical decision support boundaries, off-the-shelf software, MDDS and other software-function scope questions, and the 510(k) software-change trigger. SCOPE LIMITS: US FDA device regulation only; no EU MDR or UKCA content (see `med-device-eu`); no ISO 13485, ISO 14971, or IEC 62304 text, which are named and summarized only as FDA obligations; no drug, biologic, or combination-product rules; reflects the pinned source dates, not later FDA actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not a substitute for the guidance documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. 105).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge pack synthesized from JSP 376 Defence Acquisition Safety Policy V1.1 (April 2024, Ministry of Defence, Open Government Licence v3.0): acquisition safety requirements, safety artefacts, and their application across the standard acquisition lifecycle. Covers the policy frame and legislative baseline, SRO and User responsibilities, safety management and safety requirements, test and evaluation and the safety case, supervision and approvals decision support, and the seven lifecycle phases. SCOPE LIMITS: single-source (JSP 376 V1.1); MOD policy and guidance, not statute; builds on JSP 815 and cites JSP 655, neither reproduced here (use jsp-815 for the SMS); Chapter 4 (Non-Standard Acquisition) is unpublished in V1.1 and is not in this pack; no DEF-STAN text (Def Stan 00-056 is named, not quoted); no other JSP reproduced. Reconstructed reference notes, not MOD guidance, and no official status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collapse meaningful ambiguity with contrastive examples. Use when a plan/design has several plausible meanings, requirements feel vague, examples would clarify intent faster than grilling, or the user asks to disambiguate, find ambiguity, use behavioral kernels, or ask contrastive questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance on writing high-quality requirements: the requirement quality characteristics and the EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax) patterns — ubiquitous, event-driven, state-driven, optional-feature, unwanted-behaviour — for unambiguous, singular, verifiable requirements, plus defect/anti-pattern review and verification & traceability. Use when authoring or reviewing requirements. Original synthesis citing EARS (Mavin et al.) and NASA public-domain guidance; not a reproduction of ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148 or the EARS paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。