本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

jsp-376

Knowledge pack synthesized from JSP 376 Defence Acquisition Safety Policy V1.1 (April 2024, Ministry of Defence, Open Government Licence v3.0): acquisition safety requirements, safety artefacts, and their application across the standard acquisition lifecycle. Covers the policy frame and legislative baseline, SRO and User responsibilities, safety management and safety requirements, test and evaluation and the safety case, supervision and approvals decision support, and the seven lifecycle phases. SCOPE LIMITS: single-source (JSP 376 V1.1); MOD policy and guidance, not statute; builds on JSP 815 and cites JSP 655, neither reproduced here (use jsp-815 for the SMS); Chapter 4 (Non-Standard Acquisition) is unpublished in V1.1 and is not in this pack; no DEF-STAN text (Def Stan 00-056 is named, not quoted); no other JSP reproduced. Reconstructed reference notes, not MOD guidance, and no official status.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(13)

  • SKILL.md9.2 KB
  • chapters/ch01-acquisition-safety-policy.md6.5 KB
  • chapters/ch02-roles-and-safety-in-the-programme.md10.2 KB
  • chapters/ch03-safety-management-and-requirements.md8.6 KB
  • chapters/ch04-test-evaluation-and-safety-case.md7.6 KB
  • chapters/ch05-supervision-assurance-approvals.md6.5 KB
  • chapters/ch06-early-lifecycle-phases.md9.2 KB
  • chapters/ch07-demonstration-and-manufacture.md7.3 KB
  • chapters/ch08-in-service-and-disposal.md7.9 KB
  • cheatsheet.md5.1 KB
  • glossary.md14.2 KB
  • LICENSE7.5 KB
  • PACK.yaml1.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

JSP 376: Defence Acquisition Safety Policy

When to use

Prerequisites: none: plain Markdown. Familiarity with ALARP, a safety case, and a business case helps; the glossary defines the Defence-specific terms.

Use this skill for questions about how UK Defence acquisition programmes treat safety: what the SRO and the User each owe, which artefacts a phase produces, how a safety case is owned across the lifecycle, and what evidence an approvals submission carries. It is the acquisition-safety companion to jsp-815; it does not replace that pack.

Source: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. JSP 376 Defence Acquisition Safety Policy V1.1 (April 2024), Ministry of Defence, © Crown copyright. Reconstructed reference notes, not reproductions; licence and source links in LICENSE.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments: read Core Frameworks below.
  • With a topic: find it in the Topic Index and open the chapter it routes to.
  • With a phase name: use the Chapter Index to find the chapter that carries the phase.
  • For a term: use glossary.md; for the phase-by-artefact grid, use cheatsheet.md.

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

The six concepts

JSP 376 frames acquisition safety through six concepts: Safety Management, Safety Requirements, Test and Evaluation (including Certification), Safety Case, Supervision and Control Activities, and Acquisition Safety Assurance and Approvals Decision Support. The policy defines each concept's key policy statement, then Chapter 3 of the source applies all six to the lifecycle phases.

Safe to operate and operated safely

The aim of acquisition safety is a capability that is safe to operate and, once in service, is operated safely. Accountability follows the same split: the SRO is accountable through procurement, and ownership moves to the User at entry to service, staying with the User through in-service and disposal. Accountability is personal and cannot be delegated; development and maintenance of safety work can be assigned, but the SRO/User remains answerable for it.

The seven-phase lifecycle and the three business cases

Acquisition runs through Pre-Concept plus the six CADMID/T phases: Concept, Assessment, Demonstration, Manufacture, In-Service, and Disposal/Termination. Each phase executes the plan agreed in the previous phase, reviews the outcome, and plans what remains. Formal approving-authority decisions fall at the end of the first three phases, each on a business case: the Strategic Outline Case at the end of Pre-Concept, the Outline Business Case at the end of Concept, and the Full Business Case at the end of Assessment. The greatest opportunity to influence safety is early, and late mitigation costs more in performance, cost, and time.

Must, must make sure, and should

The policy's three directive terms carry different weights. Where it says must, the action is a compulsory requirement completed by the actioner. Where it says must make sure, delivery may be assigned to an individual, but the actioner remains accountable for the actions being conducted. Where it says should, the action is not compulsory but is recommended good practice.

Chapter Index

ChChapterSourcesCoverage
01ch01-acquisition-safety-policy.mdpp. 1-4Purpose, the six concepts, proportionality, scope, key terms, the legislative baseline (ALARP, exemptions, tolerability, hierarchy of controls), the policy framework (DDS, DSA, Def Stan 00-056 named), and preface terminology.
02ch02-roles-and-safety-in-the-programme.mdpp. 4-10SRO, User, T&E User, Lead User, Approving Authority, delivery agents, DSA, Dir DS, and ASC roles; the programme delivery envelope and DLODs; interfaces; competence; safety leadership; the seven phases and three business cases; acquisition reform themes; the Chapter 4 gap.
03ch03-safety-management-and-requirements.mdpp. 11-17The safety management key policy statement and PDCA; Organisational Safety Assessment; safety responsibilities; digital engineering, quality, and information; the safety requirements key policy statement; URD requirement flow; the safety KUR; through-life requirements; measures of effectiveness; prioritisation and trades; legal and regulatory requirements; DEDs and exemptions.
04ch04-test-evaluation-and-safety-case.mdpp. 18-22The test and evaluation key policy statement; why T&E matters; certification; the safety case key policy statement; what a safety case is, its scope and development; ownership; the safety case report.
05ch05-supervision-assurance-approvals.mdpp. 23-27The supervision key policy statement; the assurance key policy statements; the three lines of defence; the Safety Assurance Model; approvals decision support; PEAT and PEAP; safety across the five cases; Review Notes and Information Notes.
06ch06-early-lifecycle-phases.mdpp. 28-37The Pre-Concept, Concept, and Assessment phases: key policy statements, artefacts produced, and business-case evidence owed, with the Annex C evidence guide.
07ch07-demonstration-and-manufacture.mdpp. 38-43The Demonstration and Manufacture key policy statements; evidence and design change; test and evaluation; the safety case through Demonstration; production, handover, and the In-Service Date; requirements, certification, and the final baseline.
08ch08-in-service-and-disposal.mdpp. 44-50The in-service key policy statement; how the emphasis changes; safety management, requirements and compliance, and the safety case in service; the disposal key policy statement; planning and running disposal; selling, gifting, and certification.

Topic Index

  • Acquisition safety policy and the six concepts → ch01
  • ALARP, tolerability, exemptions, hierarchy of controls → ch01
  • SRO, User, and other roles → ch02
  • Safety in the programme, iron triangle, interfaces → ch02
  • Acquisition reform themes → ch02
  • Non-standard acquisition and the unpublished Chapter 4 → ch02
  • Safety Management Plan and PDCA → ch03
  • Organisational Safety Assessment → ch03
  • Safety requirements, URD, SRD, safety KUR → ch03
  • DEDs and exemptions from legislation or policy → ch03
  • Test and evaluation, ITEAP, certification → ch04
  • Safety case and safety case report → ch04
  • Supervision and control of activity → ch05
  • Assurance, three lines of defence, Safety Assurance Model → ch05
  • Approvals decision support, five cases, PEAT and PEAP → ch05
  • Pre-Concept, Concept, Assessment → ch06
  • Strategic Outline Case, Outline Business Case, Full Business Case → ch06
  • Demonstration and Manufacture → ch07
  • Duty Holder appointment and In-Service Date handover → ch07
  • In-service operation and safety case reviews → ch08
  • Disposal and termination → ch08

Supporting Files

  • glossary.md: acquisition safety terms and Annex A abbreviations, alphabetical, with the chapters that use each.
  • cheatsheet.md: the unpublished Chapter 4 note, the Annex B overview figure described, and the Annex C Safety Evidence Summary Table as a phase-by-concept grid.

Scope & Limits

  • Source version: JSP 376 Defence Acquisition Safety Policy V1.1 (April 2024); the pin was verified 2026-10-14.
  • Policy, not statute: JSP 376 is Ministry of Defence policy and guidance, not legislation. Nothing in it removes the duty to comply with statute or Defence safety regulations.
  • Builds on JSP 815 and cites JSP 655. Neither is reproduced. Use jsp-815 for the SMS; this pack does not replace it.
  • Chapter 4 (Non-Standard Acquisition) is unpublished in V1.1 and is not in this pack.
  • No DEF-STAN text. Def Stan 00-056 is named, not quoted.
  • No other JSP reproduced. The preface related-JSP list is named only.
  • No MOD endorsement. This pack is reconstructed reference notes, not MOD guidance, and has no official status.
  • No external links. Source and licence links live only in LICENSE.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the avionics development assurance standards landscape: RTCA DO-178C / EUROCAE ED-12C and its supplements (DO-330/ED-215, DO-331/ED-218, DO-332/ED-217, DO-333/ED-216); RTCA DO-254 / EUROCAE ED-80; SAE ARP4754B and ARP4761A; and the free regulator documents that recognise them (FAA AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, Order 8110.49A; EASA AMC 20-115D and AMC 20-152A). Contains no source content: each row carries only the designation, title, edition, owner, redistributability status, and the owner's URL. Use when you need to identify, cite, or locate an avionics standard; paywalled rows point to the owner, free rows point to the regulator text, and the FAA rows also name the in-repo faa-8110-49 pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

cisa-cpg

無料

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

jgsystemsconsulting のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する