本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

avionics-signpost

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the avionics development assurance standards landscape: RTCA DO-178C / EUROCAE ED-12C and its supplements (DO-330/ED-215, DO-331/ED-218, DO-332/ED-217, DO-333/ED-216); RTCA DO-254 / EUROCAE ED-80; SAE ARP4754B and ARP4761A; and the free regulator documents that recognise them (FAA AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, Order 8110.49A; EASA AMC 20-115D and AMC 20-152A). Contains no source content: each row carries only the designation, title, edition, owner, redistributability status, and the owner's URL. Use when you need to identify, cite, or locate an avionics standard; paywalled rows point to the owner, free rows point to the regulator text, and the FAA rows also name the in-repo faa-8110-49 pack.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • PACK.yaml655 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- argument-hint: [standard designation or topic, e.g. DO-178C / DO-254 / ARP4754B / ARP4761A / AC 20-115D / AC 20-152A / Order 8110.49A] -->

Avionics Development Assurance Standards: Signpost (pointers only)

This is a signpost, not a knowledge pack. It carries no standards-body content: no reproduced clauses, no normative text, no synthesised summaries of the standards. DO-178C, DO-254, and the SAE ARPs are paywalled with no redistribution grant (Excluded under this repo's docs/SOURCE-VETTING.md), so they cannot be reconstituted into a redistributable pack. What this skill does: tell you which document you want, what it is for, who owns it, whether a free copy exists, and where to get the authentic one.

When to use

You are developing or reviewing avionics software or airborne electronic hardware and need to identify or cite the governing document: which standard covers tool qualification, which AC recognises DO-254, which EASA text accepts DO-178C. Paywalled rows route you to the owner; free regulator rows route you to the authentic text or, where this repo ships one, to the installable pack.

Prerequisites: none, plain Markdown.

How to use

Find your document below. The Status column says whether it can be packaged:

  • Excluded: paywalled, no redistribution grant; buy from the owner. Cannot be packaged here.
  • Open: free to obtain; where this repo ships a pack for it, the row names it (pack: faa-8110-49).

Editions for the RTCA, EUROCAE, and FAA rows were confirmed from the FAA recognition texts and the EASA Easy Access Rules page. The SAE rows state the edition letter only because the SAE catalogue pages did not confirm a publication date; do not quote one from here.

Software (DO-178C family)

DesignationTitleEditionOwnerStatusURL
DO-178C / ED-12CSoftware Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification. Core design assurance guidance for airborne software; the means of compliance most certification programmes are judged against.DO-178C 2011-12-13; ED-12C January 2012RTCA; EUROCAEExcluded: paywalled, no redistribution grant; buy from the ownerhttps://www.rtca.org/do-178/
DO-330/ED-215, DO-331/ED-218, DO-332/ED-217, DO-333/ED-216The four DO-178C supplements named in AC 20-115D: tool qualification; model-based development and verification; object-oriented technology and related techniques; formal methods.DO 2011-12-13; ED January 2012RTCA; EUROCAEExcluded: paywalled, no redistribution grant; buy from the ownerhttps://www.rtca.org/do-178/

Airborne electronic hardware

DesignationTitleEditionOwnerStatusURL
DO-254 / ED-80Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware. Design assurance process for custom airborne electronic hardware; recognised by AC 20-152A and AMC 20-152A.DO-254 2000-04-19; ED-80 April 2000RTCA; EUROCAEExcluded: paywalled, no redistribution grant; buy from the ownerhttps://www.eurocae.net/

Aircraft and system development and safety assessment

DesignationTitleEditionOwnerStatusURL
ARP4754BGuidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems. Aircraft- and system-level development and validation process within which the DO-178C and DO-254 assurance levels sit.B (no confirmed date)SAE InternationalExcluded: paywalled, no redistribution grant; buy from the ownerhttps://www.sae.org/standards/content/arp4754b/
ARP4761AGuidelines for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Aircraft, Systems, and Equipment. Safety assessment companion to ARP4754B.A (no confirmed date)SAE InternationalExcluded: paywalled, no redistribution grant; buy from the ownerhttps://www.sae.org/standards/content/arp4761a/

Free regulator paths

DesignationTitleEditionOwnerStatusURL
AC 20-115DAirborne Software Development Assurance Using EUROCAE ED-12( ) and RTCA DO-178( ). FAA recognition of DO-178C/ED-12C; the FAA text this repo packages builds on it.2017-07-21FAAOpen, pack: faa-8110-49https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/1032046
AC 20-152ADevelopment Assurance for Airborne Electronic Hardware. FAA recognition of DO-254/ED-80, including the simple versus complex device treatment.2022-10-07FAAOpen, pack: faa-8110-49https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_20-152A.pdf
FAA Order 8110.49ASoftware Approval Guidelines. How FAA offices plan and conduct software reviews and conformity inspections; the base text of pack faa-8110-49.2018-03-29FAAOpen, pack: faa-8110-49https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/FAA_Order_8110.49A.pdf
AMC 20-115D and AMC 20-152AEASA acceptance of DO-178C and DO-254, published inside Easy Access Rules for Acceptable Means of Compliance for Airworthiness of Products, Parts and Appliances (AMC-20). The Amendment 23 volume lists AMC 20-115D, Airborne Software Development Assurance Using EUROCAE ED-12 and RTCA DO-178, and AMC 20-152A.Amendment 14 origin (ED Decision 2017/020/R) and Amendment 19 origin (ED Decision 2020/010/R), consolidated in EAR Amendment 23 (June 2023)EASAOpen, pack: easa-rules. The origin decisions: ED Decision 2017/020/R (https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/agency-decisions/ed-decision-2017020r) and ED Decision 2020/010/R (https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/agency-decisions/ed-decision-2020010r)https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/easy-access-rules-acceptable-means-compliance-airworthiness

Scope & Limits

  • No reproduced standards text. Rows carry designation, title, edition, owner, status, and URL only.
  • The open EASA path is packs/easa-rules. The AMC row carries the free URL.
  • Editions are pinned as the How to use note states. Do not treat a row as a newer edition than the one printed.
  • SAE rows carry the edition letter only. ARP4754B and ARP4761A have no publication date in this signpost.

Signpost content is original JG Systems Consulting Ltd. work, MIT licensed. Trademarks and standard designations are named for identification only.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

cisa-cpg

無料

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月15日 更新

jgsystemsconsulting のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する