1,548 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Head-to-Head Stock Comparison — compares two stocks across valuation, growth, profitability, financial health, technical setup, sentiment, and risk with category winners and a weighted overall score. Triggered by "trade compare <TICKER1> <TICKER2>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical Analysis skill — price action, indicators (RSI/MACD/Stochastic), chart patterns, support/resistance, volume, Bollinger Bands, and relative strength vs SPY. Returns Technical Score (0-100). Triggered by "trade technical <TICKER>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stock Screener — pre-built screens (growth, value, momentum, dividend, earnings beats) plus custom natural language criteria. Returns top 10-20 matches ranked by Screen Fit Score (0-100). Triggered by "trade screen growth/value/momentum/dividend/earnings" or "trade screen custom <criteria>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits existing landing pages for conversion rate optimization. Scores hero section, CTA placement, social proof, objection handling, and form friction on a 1-10 scale. Use when someone says 'audit my landing page', 'improve conversions', 'why isn't my page converting', 'CRO audit', 'landing page feedback', 'optimize my signup page', 'page review', 'conversion rate', 'bounce rate is high', 'nobody is signing up', or anything about improving an existing page's performance. Even if they just share a URL and say 'what do you think' or 'how can I improve this' — if there's a page involved and conversion matters, this is the skill. Always use this over generic advice when an actual page exists to audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits brand/ files for completeness, consistency, and freshness. Use when the agent or user wants to review brand files, audit marketing docs, check brand consistency, verify brand health, or assess what's missing from brand memory. Produces a structured audit report with per-file scores, cross-file contradiction detection, staleness flags, and recommended next skills to run. This is the quality gate for the brand memory system. Also use when someone says 'check my brand', 'brand audit', 'what's missing', 'is my brand ready', 'brand health', 'review my marketing docs', or before running any campaign to verify brand foundations are solid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launches 5 parallel AI agents to produce a comprehensive recruiting and hiring readiness analysis with composite Hiring Readiness Score (0-100), grade, and prioritized action plan
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Batch Resume Screening — score and rank candidates 0-100 against job requirements, flag red flags (job hopping, gaps, skill mismatches), output Pass/Phone Screen/Skip recommendation per candidate
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
60-Second Role Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents with grade, top 3 fixes, and CTA to full analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show a team skill's eval history — committed receipts per version and this machine's local runs — as a Markdown board from the terum-skills CLI, without fetching. Use when the user asks how a shared skill scored, which version passed, or what its receipts say.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show one skill in full — its team record or Library folder, versions, installs, health, and its eval report when it is a team skill — as Markdown boards from the terum-skills CLI. Use when the user names a skill and asks what it is, who installed it, how it scored, or what its receipt says.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DECIDE-phase doctrine for an Arbor research run: when to merge, prune, combine, or finalize; how the held-out merge gate works; and the rule that the final report uses TEST scores. Load before deciding what to do with completed experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building durable AI agents or agentic workflows with Inngest and AgentKit, including model calls, tool calls, multi-agent networks, human approval, realtime progress, provider rate limits, crash-safe execution, and Agent Evals handoff. Covers AgentKit, `step.ai`, `step.run`, `step.waitForEvent`, native realtime, and when to use lower-level Inngest primitives instead of an in-memory agent loop. Use `inngest-agent-evals` with this skill when the user wants scoring, sessions, experiments, deferred scorers, or outcome-based evaluation for the agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits your Cowork setup across five categories, scores each one, and gives you a prioritized improvement plan. For reviewing how well you are using Cowork, when optimizing your workspace configuration, or during a quarterly productivity review. Use when the user says "health check", "am I using cowork right", "optimize my setup", "cowork audit", "what am I missing", "is my setup good", or "how do I get more out of cowork".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a feature or code change made by Claude is complete and the developer wants to confirm they actually understood it before shipping. Triggers on "handoff", "quiz me", "comprehension check", "did I understand this", "verify I read the code", "test my understanding", or after finishing a feature when the developer wants to take ownership of AI-written code. Also triggers on requests for an interactive or clickable quiz ("interactive mode", "let me answer with the mouse", "mode interactif", "je réponds à la souris"). Quizzes the developer on WHERE the logic lives (file/function) and WHY decisions were made (trade-offs, behavior, debugging), with the number of questions scaled to the size of the change. Multiple-choice questions are clickable by default (asked through `AskUserQuestion`) and fall back to typed answers. Points to file:line on wrong answers, allows one retry, then reveals the answer, and ends with a score plus the weak areas to re-read. Conducts the quiz in the developer's language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to check an IP, domain, file hash, or URL against VirusTotal's reputation database. Returns detection ratio, verdict, community score, and key findings. Commonly invoked by investigation skills (/ip-investigation, /domain-investigation, /hash-investigation, /url-investigation) and by analysts enriching IOCs. Other agents/skills can chain this for VirusTotal enrichment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need authoritative classification, threat-name, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, dynamic-analysis or sandbox results on a file hash, or when you need network threat intelligence for a URL/domain/IP from ReversingLabs Spectra Analyze (A1000). Returns verdict, risk score, AV detection ratio, threat name, behavioural tags, and pivot candidates (parent containers, extracted files, related samples by family). Commonly invoked by /hash-investigation and /malware-analysis. Other agents/skills can chain this for deeper malware enrichment beyond VirusTotal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need abuse-report history for an IPv4/IPv6 address — confidence score, total reports, distinct reporters, usage type. IP-only. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation. Retrieval only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assigning a confidence level to an analytical judgment, the user asks "how confident are we?" / "what is the confidence on X?", or the orchestrator's tradecraft pipeline calls for a confidence level before publishing. Provides three named levels (High, Moderate, Low) with 0-100 score ranges aligned to STIX, and the rule that confidence cannot exceed what the weakest load-bearing claim supports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and remove the tells of AI-generated writing in BOTH English and Spanish, and read back the evidence honestly. Use when the user asks to "de-AI" / "humanize" / "un-slop" a draft, to examine whether text carries the tells (delve, tapestry, "it's not just X, it's Y", "here's the thing", em-dash overuse, an assistant's own closing line left in the document), to compare documents for overlap, or mentions signs-of-ai / SignsOfAI. Backed by the SignsOfAI engine — for a measured 0–100 score, sentence-rhythm burstiness, originality, citations, a writer baseline or perplexity, hand off to that engine (web app, CLI or MCP server) as described below. It cannot determine who wrote a text and must never imply that it can.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lead Qualification And Scoring Specialist. Use to define ICP filters, score inbound and outbound leads, and improve pipeline focus for a founder-led sales motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
命理圆桌会——多流派命理师（盲派、子平格局派、调候派、民国新派）对同一八字命盘进行圆桌论命：多视角总评、交叉质疑、可证伪断语、逐轮记分复盘。用户提到八字、四柱、命盘分析、批命、论流年大运、盲派/格局/调候论命、"多个命理师讨论"、验证式论命时使用本 skill；即使用户只是贴出一张八字排盘求分析，也应启用（可用轻量模式）。Multi-school Chinese BaZi (Four Pillars) roundtable reading: several fortune-tellers from rival schools analyze the same natal chart, cross-examine each other, issue falsifiable predictions, and keep score. Use whenever the user asks about BaZi, Four Pillars, Chinese astrology chart reading, or destiny analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework to translate strategy into measurable objectives across Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning & Growth perspectives. Use this skill when the user needs to set strategic KPIs, create a strategy map, align organizational goals, or connect daily operations to strategic vision — even if they say 'how do we measure strategy execution' or 'our KPIs feel disconnected'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Implement VADER sentiment analysis for social media text scoring. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze sentiment in tweets, reviews, or social posts, compute compound sentiment scores, or classify text polarity — even if they say 'is this positive or negative', 'sentiment of these comments', or 'social media mood analysis'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。