478 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-dimensional Quality Acceptance and Problem Convergence Engine - Deeply deconstruct requirements, eliminate extreme defects, define absolutely objective acceptance and failure criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a vulnerability exception and risk acceptance tracking system with approval workflows, compensating controls documentation, and expiration management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes development requirements and generates structured acceptance criteria for AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS) tasks. Use when the user needs to define acceptance criteria, write requirements, scope work, or create a definition of done for EDS blocks, components, variants, bug fixes, or styling changes. Produces task breakdowns, identifies edge cases, and documents analysis for new blocks, variants, behavior modifications, CSS-only changes, and bug fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawのプラグインを公開前に検証し、導入・削除、設定修復、起動、SDK互換性や配布パッケージの動作を確認して、結果と未検証項目を整理するスキル。
Govern cross-module regression in large repositories with a REGRESSION.md ledger that records each module's downstream consumers and executable acceptance command. After a change, run the changed module and every affected downstream command, and use observed exit codes as regression evidence under the project's delivery policy. Use for module regression, regression ledgers, impact audits, downstream verification, and changes where modifying A may break B.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
複数工程の計画書を読み、各工程に合うECCコマンドを貼り付け用に生成します。工程の識別情報や完了条件を含め、対象範囲を渡せないコマンドは保留として示します。
Jiraの課題を取得し、要件やテスト条件を整理するスキルです。進捗コメントの追加、ステータス変更、課題検索を開発作業の流れで扱えます。
AIエージェントが実装の多くを担う開発チーム向けに、計画、責任分担、レビュー基準、テスト要件を整理し、生成コードを扱う開発プロセスを設計するスキル。
Prove existing work meets acceptance conditions without expanding scope. Use for validation-only tasks, completion checks, focused gate runs, and last-mile proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run or inspect the local Release-Green observer for an exact base or combined PR candidate, separating hard failures, advisory drift and incomplete evidence. Use for maintainer preflight; full CI acceptance remains a separate requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a scoped, read-only quality scan and report exact-candidate evidence, failures and frozen debt. Use for an ad-hoc gate sweep or release preparation; a static scan is not full release acceptance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the SPARC Specification phase — gather requirements, define acceptance criteria, identify constraints, and store the spec in memory
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks an AI team run against its acceptance criteria using the evidence bundle. Use when the user asks whether the work is done or correct, or before completing a run. Separates verified evidence from agent claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans, executes, and documents validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and negotiates job offers. Decodes base, bonus, equity, sign-on, level and terms with unknowns kept unknown and each offer in its own currency, benchmarks against checkable pay data, finds true leverage, drafts one counter as email and call script, role-plays the recruiter, and handles the salary-expectations number, deadlines and extensions, "best and final", competing offers, counteroffers and written acceptance or decline. Country-aware (India CTC, 13th-month pay, public-sector scales). Use when the user says "I got an offer of...", "is this offer good", "should I negotiate", "how do I counter", "compare my offers", "what is my equity worth", "they asked my salary expectations", "they want an answer by Friday", "can I ask for more time", "should I accept" or "practice the negotiation call". Uses Reactive Resume MCP tools when connected. For logging the offer, its deadline and withdrawal notes, job-application-manager; for other interview answers, interview-prep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to write specs before code, define acceptance criteria, plan features before implementation, generate tests from specifications, or follow spec-first development practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create job stories using the 'When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]' format with detailed acceptance criteria. Use when writing job stories, creating JTBD-style backlog items, or expressing user situations and motivations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。