「aris」の検索結果

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to verify Java performance optimizations by comparing profiling results before and after refactoring — including baseline validation, post-refactoring report generation, quantitative before/after metrics comparison, side-by-side flamegraph analysis, regression detection, or creating profiling-comparison-analysis and profiling-final-results documentation. This should trigger for requests such as Verify performance fix; Verify the performance; Verify the memory; Verify the threading; Compare before and after profiling results; Check for performance regressions after refactoring. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: Other Transaction or OT should-cost, cost estimate, cost-share analysis, milestone pricing, funding profile, proposed-price comparison, prototype price analysis, research OT budget, production follow-on OT estimate, or OT price-reasonableness support under 10 U.S.C. 4021 or 4022. Build auditable milestone-based .xlsx workbooks using BLS OEWS wages, CALC+ positioning, GSA Per Diem, materials, cost sharing, and agreement-specific fees. Use for pre-solicitation budgets and proposal comparisons. Do NOT use for FAR-based IGCEs, OT project descriptions, grants, or an Agreements Officer's determination. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and, when travel applies, gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare cost estimates across projects, versions, and scenarios. Identify variances, benchmark against standards, and generate comparison reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side stat comparisons with context. Adjust for era, pace of play, league differences. Advanced metrics explained in plain English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drop a folder of vendor quotes, proposals, and SOWs on Cowork -- normalizes them into one comparison matrix, computes true total cost of ownership, surfaces the terms each vendor buried, and arms you with negotiation leverage points and reference-check questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ARIS, the Auto Research in Sleep skill-based research harness, for setup, workflow routing, reviewer backend integration, state recovery, experiment operations, and repository maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create "[Competitor] alternative" and comparison pages for developer tools. Build honest, high-converting comparison content that ranks for competitive search terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares PIA/DPIA methodologies: CNIL PIA tool, ICO DPIA template, NIST Privacy Framework, and ISO 29134. Provides methodology selection criteria based on regulatory jurisdiction, organisation maturity, processing complexity, and resource availability. Covers regulatory acceptance, tool features, and cross-methodology mapping. Keywords: PIA methodology, CNIL, ICO, NIST Privacy Framework, ISO 29134, DPIA comparison, assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for evaluating and selecting Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). Covers TCF v2.2 certification requirements, Global Privacy Control support, multi-regulation compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), A/B testing capabilities, API integration options, reporting features, and a structured vendor comparison methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Head-to-Head Stock Comparison — takes two tickers and compares them across valuation, growth, profitability, technical setup, sentiment, risk profile, and analyst consensus with a scored comparison table and overall recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Готовит многомерный разбор конкурентов — feature-матрица, SWOT с cross-strategy, 5 сил Портера, сравнение ценообразования, позиционирование, прогноз стратегических ходов и три уровня дифференциации (догнать / отстроиться / создать новое). Адаптируется под цель (продуктовый дизайн / fundraising / стратегия / годовой обзор). User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on /pm-competitive, "конкурентный анализ", "разбор конкурентов", "five forces", "SWOT", "competitive analysis", "competitor comparison", "feature matrix vs competitors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with MrBayes, BEAST2, RevBayes, and PhyloBayes including MCMC convergence diagnostics and model comparison. Use when needing posterior probability support, Bayesian model averaging, site-heterogeneous models for deep phylogenies, or formal model comparison via stepping-stone sampling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive intelligence and market positioning analysis. Researches competitors, compares features, pricing, and tech stacks, then produces a prioritized gap analysis with actionable roadmap. Trigger on: competitors, competitive analysis, gap analysis, feature comparison, market research, what are we missing, who are our competitors, pricing comparison, market positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Composite any two HTML screens into a locked photo plate of hands holding an open foldable phone — a 1448×1086 still with two blank 495×849 / 498×849 screen slots (left and right) — to make side-by-side meme and comparison videos: TikTok vs Reels, ChatGPT vs Claude, "me vs my friend", before/after, two apps racing. Trigger on: "foldable phone meme", "put X on the left screen and Y on the right", "two-screen comparison video", "the dual-screen phone meme", or any request that names two apps/feeds/chats to show at once. The plate, geometry, and camera are finished — the agent only authors what plays INSIDE the two screens and renders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mortgage Calculator & Affordability Analysis — monthly payments, amortization, loan comparison, affordability limits, rent vs buy, and refinance break-even with rate comparison tables

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-Side Property Comparison — takes two addresses and compares across price, specs, rental income, neighborhood, and investment potential with a winner per category and overall recommendation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate "X vs Y" and "Alternative to X" SEO/CRO pages targeting competitive search intent during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to build comparison pages, target competitive search traffic, or when user asks "build alternatives pages", "X vs Y page", "competitor comparison page", "we're better than X page", "capture branded search", "competitive SEO". Outputs SCR-ALT-* page specs and GTM-* channel entries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish baseline → snapshot → compare → history monitoring for any KPI, config, or metric that can drift during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to monitor drift, baseline a value for later comparison, or when user asks "how do we track if X changes?", "baseline this", "config drift", "performance regression", "metric drift", "compare to last week", "is this getting worse?". Outputs MON-DRIFT-* entries with baseline + comparison rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。