1,171 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Claude-native review of code for quality, structure, naming, and maintainability (no external AI). Use when reviewing a file or diff for code quality before committing. Trigger on "review this code", "code review", "is this well-written". For security, use /security-verify; for companion-AI review, use /review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python code quality review lens. SOLID principles, dead code, exception handling, resource leaks, thread safety, performance. Triggered by "quality" ("품질"), "SOLID", "dead code" ("데드코드"), "exception", "resource leak", "thread safety" keywords.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run all code quality checks (security, complexity, test coverage) on the current PR and post a combined report as a GitHub PR comment. Use before merging a PR, during code review, or when asked to check code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Codacy — codacy code quality management. Covers automated code reviews, pattern configuration, coverage tracking, security analysis, and repository settings. Use when managing Codacy projects, reviewing code patterns, configuring quality gates, or tracking code quality trends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code quality patterns and guidelines for ToolUniverse tool development. Apply when writing, fixing, or refactoring tool Python code in the ToolUniverse project. Encodes lessons from 80+ debug rounds. Use alongside devtu-fix-tool and devtu-self-evolve. Triggers: implementing tool fixes, writing new tool classes, reviewing tool code quality, checking schema correctness, looking up API-specific bug fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full adversarial quality loop — implement, self-attack, parallel verification, quality gates, final validation. 全品質循環：實現、自攻、並行驗證、質量關卡、最終確認. Use when: implement task with quality, run adversarial review, verify code quality, run quality gates, complete workflow task
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use CodeRabbit CLI to receive external code review feedback and address identified issues. Invoke this skill when the user requests CodeRabbit review, or proactively after implementing significant code changes to get feedback and improve code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code quality dashboard. Wraps existing project tools (type checker, linter, test runner, dead code detector, shell linter), computes a weighted composite 0-10 score, and tracks trends over time. Use when: "health check", "code quality", "how healthy is the codebase", "run all checks", "quality score". (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
機能追加やコード整理の後に、ビルド・型・lint・テスト・秘密情報の検索・差分を6段階で確認するスキル。合否と修正事項をまとめ、PRを作成できる状態か報告します。
アプリ開発を計画・実装・評価のエージェントに分け、動作中の画面を検証しながら、設定した品質基準に向けて修正を繰り返す開発支援スキル。
AIエージェントが継続して作業するループを、品質確認と評価、失敗時の停止・再実行の方針を組み合わせて設計し、進捗停滞や再試行に対処するスキル。
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark CodeGraph retrieval quality on a real codebase by comparing agent behavior with vs without CodeGraph. Use when the user runs /agent-eval or asks to test, benchmark, audit, or validate a codegraph version (the local dev build or a published npm version) against a language's repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only code quality audit — scan the current working directory for common issues (bugs, dead code, security hotspots, missing error handling) and return a prioritised findings report. No files are edited. Use when asked to "audit the code", "quick audit", "find issues", "code scan", or "what's wrong with this codebase". (munder-difflin)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code changes using CodeRabbit AI. Use when user asks for code review, PR feedback, code quality checks, security issues, or requests fix-review cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities". Do NOT use for accessibility (use web-accessibility), SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive multi-area audits (use web-quality-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the quality-assurance loop — find the highest-value untested behavior in the codebase, judge it against the QA value bar, and file ONE locked `qa` issue specifying the test to write. Never writes code or tests; the next-qa skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "QAアイデア", "next qa idea", or wants the QA backlog refilled without implementation.