「codex review」の検索結果

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run [implement-spec](../implement-spec/SKILL.md) with Codex doing the implementation passes while you orchestrate, integrate, and review. Use when the user asks to implement a spec with Codex, or to run implement-spec with Codex as the implementer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit, trim, cut, caption, subtitle, reframe, combine, add background music to, or export video, audio, and image files through Cassette. Use this skill whenever the user asks to change, preview, or render a media file in the project — even if they never say "Cassette" or name a tool — for example "trim the intro off demo.mp4", "add subtitles to this clip", "make me a 30-second cut with music", "why is there dead air at the start". Drives the local Oh My Cassette stdio MCP tools in Codex or Claude as one multi-turn conversation with the Cassette agent, with per-turn timeline previews, guided questions, and rendering only on explicit export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review for PRs or staged changes. >80% confidence threshold. Verdict: APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT. Triggers: review, pr, code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture and review Agent Skill observations, and create, run, diagnose, or iteratively improve Skill evaluations (evals) with the skill-up CLI. Use when the user asks to record explicitly attributed Skill usage or feedback; review observations or user-supplied traces/transcripts; turn an approved observation into a regression case; evaluate, test, regress, verify, fix, improve, iterate, or evolve a Skill; add or strengthen eval cases; write eval.yaml/case.yaml; run skill-up run/validate/list-cases/report/import/init; or migrate from Anthropic evals.json. Plugin observation capture/review require either the Codex skill-up plugin or an observer-enabled DSH skill-up plugin. User-supplied external evidence can be reviewed without a plugin; evaluation remains multi-engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a focused STRIDE-based security review using Bug Hunter-native artifacts. Use whenever the user asks for a full security audit, repository security review, weekly security scan, PR security review with deeper validation, or wants dependency CVEs and threat-model context combined into one workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Cursor, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 69 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "deep paper review", "auto research", "switch model", "multi-agent", "coding session", "session inbox", "cursor agent", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue a task in OpenAI Codex CLI through a portable Director handoff packet. Use when the user asks Codex to take over, wants an independent Codex implementation or review, or needs to preserve decisions and verification while changing CLIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex、Gemini、Claudeの3つのAIに並列でコードレビューを依頼し、結果を統合レポートとして出力するスキル。複数AIの視点から包括的なレビューを得たいとき、「マルチAIレビュー」「3つのAIでレビュー」「Codex Gemini Claudeでレビュー」などと言及した時に使用。

Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Includes bundled scripts for specialist-review (code review) and test-review-request (test audit) that delegate to Claude CLI. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate talent review and people decisions with a structured view of performance, potential, readiness, risks, and development actions using talent calibration and 9-box logic. Use when preparing talent review, succession planning, promotion readiness, or performance calibration sessions. Do not use for payroll administration, HRIS updates, or generic praise notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review commercial contracts, NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, and vendor agreements for obligation clarity, risk allocation, termination, data handling, and negotiation red flags. Use when a user needs a structured contract summary, red flag list, fallback positions, or clause-by-clause review. Do not use as jurisdiction-specific legal advice, litigation strategy, or final legal sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Grok Build, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 78 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "auto research", "switch model", "hand off a session", "session handoff", "switch engine", "continue on codex", "continue on claude", "move this session to another engine", "multi-agent coding", "coding session", "session inbox", "grok session", "grok build", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness", "clawo runs", "run ledger", "session cost", "coding-agent token usage", "spend cap", "budget limit", "maxBudgetUsd", "durable workflow", "resume a run", "verify a coding run", "acceptance contract", "evidence bundle", "did the agent's tests actually pass", "protected tests", "agent edited the tests", "human gate", "repair loop", "clawo workflow", "clawo verify", "clawo solve", "clawo fanout", "fix and verify", "solve from the terminal".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Yuzu pull request end to end with a static-first trust gate, isolated dynamic testing, adversarial Kimi/Codex review, a posted verdict, and head-SHA-bound re-review. Use when the user types forms such as "go PR123", "go 123", or "/go PR123"; use `--promote SHA` only after a collaborator accepts the static review of an external fork.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridge Codex to web-based AI model products by packaging local task context, scrub-checking it, sending it through an approved browser surface to ChatGPT Pro, Claude, Grok, Gemini, or another web model, waiting for the answer, and returning the model response to the user or Codex. Also guide DevSpace-like MCP Connector Mode when the user wants ChatGPT Pro or another MCP-capable web host to access approved local workspaces without relying on Codex browser automation. Use when the user asks for GPT Pro, ChatGPT Pro, Claude web, Grok, Gemini web, web model bridge, external model consult, ask another model, second opinion, use a web AI model, browserless agent access to GPT Pro, MCP connector, DevSpace-like workflow, or send local repo context to a browser-based model for planning, review, debugging, architecture discussion, or implementation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain a review-first Markdown knowledge base for Codex practices with source provenance, engineering capture, citation-aware queries, explicit archive and promotion, and deterministic linting. Use when asked to capture a durable engineering lesson, ingest Codex research, query or archive what the repository knows, check wiki health, reconcile conflicting guidance, or promote verified knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets, dependencies, and infrastructure permissions; do not use to exploit live systems or modify code unless separately requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。