206 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Identify differentially accessible chromatin regions across conditions using DiffBind, csaw, DESeq2, or edgeR. Use when comparing ATAC-seq accessibility between treatment groups, choosing between consensus-peak vs sliding-window approaches, picking the correct normalization (full library vs reads-in-peaks), correcting batch with SVA/RUVseq, or interpreting log2FC and FDR thresholds in a chromatin context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process and analyze single-cell ATAC-seq data with Signac, ArchR, SnapATAC2, or Cell Ranger ATAC. Use when handling 10X scATAC or 10X Multiome (paired RNA+ATAC) data, performing per-cell QC, choosing between ArchR/Signac/SnapATAC2 ecosystems, building per-cluster consensus peaksets, integrating with paired scRNA-seq, doublet detection (AMULET vs ArchR vs scDblFinder), or running pseudobulk differential accessibility per cluster.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Two-layer memory for executive decisions, separating raw deliberation from approved decisions to prevent hallucinated consensus. Use when logging decisions, reviewing past decisions, or checking overdue action items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating multiple AI agents with Agent Relay's workflow engine and need to pick the right orchestration pattern - covers the 10 core patterns (fan-out, pipeline, hub-spoke, consensus, mesh, handoff, cascade, dag, debate, hierarchical) plus 14 specialized ones, with decision framework and accurate SDK/YAML examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-earnings analysis for A-share stocks. Builds scenario frameworks (actual vs consensus, beat/miss cases), identifies key metrics to watch, and prepares positioning notes before Chinese companies report quarterly results. Use instead of the original earnings-preview skill for A-share coverage. Triggers on "A股财报前瞻", "季报前瞻", "业绩前瞻", "earnings preview", "what to watch for [company] earnings", or "pre-earnings setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
epigraHMM provides a set of tools for the analysis of epigenomic data based on hidden Markov Models. It contains two separate peak callers, one for consensus peaks from biological or technical replicates, and one for differential peaks from multi-replicate multi-condition experiments. In differential peak calling, epigraHMM provides window-specific posterior probabilities associated with every possible combinatorial pattern of read enrichment across conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
algorithm for determining cluster count and membership by stability evidence in unsupervised analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Reddit threads for sentiment, consensus opinions, top arguments, and discussion patterns. Use this when users want to understand Reddit community opinions, analyze discussions, or gather insights from subreddit conversations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-Head Stock Comparison — takes two tickers and compares them across valuation, growth, profitability, technical setup, sentiment, risk profile, and analyst consensus with a scored comparison table and overall recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Earnings preview deck, quarterly earnings presentation, earnings summary slides, consensus vs actual presentation, earnings preview report, pre-earnings analysis, earnings expectations deck, quarterly preview, upcoming earnings summary, earnings announcement preview
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-event analyst note (conferences, KOL events, site visits) with the professional note anatomy — headline verdict, per-stock takeaways with model numbers, KOL distillation, cross-trial comparison lattices, modeled deltas vs consensus (peak × POS), three what's-changed vectors, risk bullets, and materiality-rated conflicting views. Use after any med event to convert the event into actionable takeaways.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Med-adapted earnings preview: consensus estimates, historical surprises, guidance sensitivities, and the FDA-catalyst overlay (PDUFA/AdCom/trial readouts near the print) for biotech/pharma names.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Earnings sentiment analysis, analyst estimates vs guidance, earnings surprise history, consensus sentiment, earnings revision trends, analyst rating changes, earnings beat miss track record, guidance accuracy, whisper numbers, pre-announcement sentiment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Clinical Embryologist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Embryologist judgment. Reasons from gamete and embryo biology, manufacturing-quality lab control, and prespecified cycle/oocyte/embryo denominators through Vienna consensus KPIs, Gardner/ASEBIR grading, time-lapse morphokinetics, WHO 6th-edition andrology, and vitrification SOPs while treating media-lot and incubator-gas drift, witness mix-ups, abnormal fertilization (1PN/3PN), and clinical case-mix confounding as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research emerging academic trends by combining scholarly databases, web sources, and news to identify rising research areas, breakthrough papers, and shifting scientific consensus. Ideal for R&D teams tracking frontier science.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compute evolutionary distances and build phylogenetic trees using Biopython Bio.Phylo.TreeConstruction. Use when creating distance matrices from alignments, building NJ/UPGMA trees, generating bootstrap consensus, or needing quick exploratory phylogenies before running full ML analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify differentially accessible chromatin regions across conditions using DiffBind, csaw, DESeq2, or edgeR. Use when comparing ATAC-seq accessibility between treatment groups, choosing between consensus-peak vs sliding-window approaches, picking the correct normalization (full library vs reads-in-peaks), correcting batch with SVA/RUVseq, or interpreting log2FC and FDR thresholds in a chromatin context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA using variant callers optimized for low allele fractions with UMI-based error suppression. Reliably detects mutations at VAF above 0.5 percent using consensus-based approaches. Use when identifying tumor mutations from plasma DNA or tracking specific variants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull pre-computed ortholog calls from public databases (OrthoDB, Ensembl Compara, OMA browser, eggNOG, PANTHER, KEGG Orthology, HomoloGene) via their REST APIs. Use when orthologs are already curated upstream, when the question is "what is the X ortholog of Y" rather than "how to infer orthology de novo", when batch-mapping gene IDs across species, or when comparing the resources for consensus calls. Encodes confidence-level semantics, 1:1 vs 1:many vs many:many, HomoloGene deprecation, and when to defect to de novo computation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ATAC-seq processing with assay QC, MACS3 peak calling, consensus peak matrices, differential accessibility, and motif or footprint follow-up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convene a roundtable of sub-agents that debate a decision or proposal from opposing perspectives — parallel independent statements, anonymous cross-review, then a chaired verdict reporting consensus and dissent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。