「discussion」の検索結果

传播心理解码。给定一段内容，用 5 个经典传播学理论解码它为什么能引起受众共鸣，分析受众情绪底层和有效立场，输出聊天室的讨论方向。 触发方式：/dbs-spread、「传播心理解码」、「为什么这个能火」、「受众想听什么」、「这个内容打中了什么情绪」 Transmission psychology decoder. Given a piece of content, analyze the psychological mechanism that makes it resonate, identify the emotional core and effective stance, and output direction for chatroom discussion. Trigger: /dbs-spread, "why does this resonate", "what emotion does this hit", "decode this content"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 帮我设计一节班会, 主题班会方案, 班会课教案, 开学第一课, 安全教育班会, 心理健康班会, or plan a class meeting as a 班主任. Produces a 主题班会 plan in Chinese with the background and goals, preparation, a timed sequence of student-led activities, discussion questions, the 班主任's closing words, follow-up actions for the following weeks, and notes for sensitive topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write formal board meeting minutes from an agenda, notes, transcript, or discussion summary. Use when asked to draft board minutes, governance minutes, meeting minutes for a board, or a formal record of decisions and actions. Produces structured board minutes with attendees, agenda items, resolutions, decisions, action register, and approval-ready wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches Reddit using a brand's Brand DNA to find promotable pain-point discussions, target subreddits, and real user search language. Produces a prioritized Reddit opportunity list for content seeding, helpful replies, and prompt research inspiration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:i-have-adhd` or Claude Code `/superloopy:i-have-adhd` invocation, or when a qualifying leading `loopy`/`루피` task receives Superloopy's non-diagnostic ADHD-friendly output overlay. Do not activate from typos, fragmented writing, urgency, grammar, language proficiency, or ordinary discussion of ADHD, attention, focus, accessibility, or cognitive load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed test code against universal testing rules before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, generates, or refactors tests, before presenting, committing, or merging them. Use for pytest (test_*.py, *_test.py), PHPUnit/Pest (*Test.php), Jest/Vitest (*.test.ts, *.spec.js), Go (*_test.go), files under tests/, __tests__/, or spec/, and review requests like 'write tests for X', 'add tests', 'test this', 'review these tests', or PR diffs containing tests. Can also guide test writing when explicitly invoked before the work. This skill is the quality gate that prevents AI-generated test bloat. DO NOT USE for production or implementation code review (use clean-code-guard), CI or test-runner configuration, running or debugging tests, or general architecture discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning an AISTATS project timeline from venue fit through abstract submission, full-paper upload, supplementary material, review release, author-reviewer discussion, decision, camera-ready, PMLR publication, registration, presentation, and artifact release, with backward-planning offsets for theory-plus-experiments papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting an ACL author response inside an ACL Rolling Review cycle on OpenReview, covering the response window before meta-review, reviewer discussion dynamics, score-change strategy, flagging review issues to the area chair, anonymity rules, and deciding between responding now versus revising for a later ARR cycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning results into an explicit theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — the "what new theory do we learn?" statement and the discussion section. Frames the contribution and implications; it does not build the original theory (amj-theory-development) or run the analysis (amj-data-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and scrape Twitter/X posts using Apify. Use when you need to find tweets, track brand mentions, monitor competitors on Twitter, or analyze Twitter discussions. Uses Twitter native search syntax (since:/until:) for reliable date filtering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search Hacker News stories and comments using the free Algolia API. No Apify token needed. Use when you need to find HN discussions, track mentions, discover Show HN launches, or monitor tech community sentiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape and search Reddit posts using Apify. Use when you need to find Reddit discussions, track competitor mentions, monitor product feedback, discover pain points, or analyze subreddit content. Supports keyword filtering, time-based searches, and subreddit-specific queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract commenters from LinkedIn posts via Apify. Returns commenter names, titles, LinkedIn profile URLs, and comment text. Use to find warm leads engaging with relevant discussions. No LinkedIn cookies required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General-purpose X/Twitter research agent. Searches X for real-time perspectives, dev discussions, product feedback, cultural takes, breaking news, and expert opinions. Works like a web research agent but uses X as the source. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "/x-research", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic. NOT for: posting tweets or account management. Note: currently uses recent search (last 7 days). Full-archive search is available on the same pay-per-use X API plan but not yet implemented in this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when YouTube is or could be relevant — even if not mentioned: pasted video/channel/playlist links, video IDs, @handles, creator lookups, video summaries, quotes, translations, topic research, tutorials, talks, lectures, expert discussions, product reviews, how-to guides, new product announcements, first looks, or anything where video content is fresher or richer than text search. Covers transcripts, video/channel search, channel browsing, playlists, and within-channel search. Not for uploads, account management, or written-source-only research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to find YouTube content on any topic: searching for videos or channels, finding creators who cover a subject, discovering tutorials, talks, or expert discussions, or looking up a channel by name or handle. Also use proactively when the user wants to research a topic and YouTube is a good source. Not for account management or written-source-only research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when YouTube is or could be relevant — even if not mentioned: pasted video/channel/playlist links, video IDs, @handles, creator lookups, video summaries, quotes, translations, topic research, tutorials, talks, lectures, expert discussions, product reviews, how-to guides, new product announcements, or anything where video content is fresher or richer than text search. Covers transcripts, video/channel search, channel browsing, playlists, and within-channel search. Not for uploads, account management, or written-source-only research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。