Build or restructure a course syllabus from a topic list or reading list — course description + prerequisites, week-by-week schedule (topic → readings → deliverables), measurable learning objectives, an assessment scheme + rubric, standard policies (late work, AI use, academic integrity, accessibility), and a per-week work-list to hand to `/create-lecture`. Use when user says "build a syllabus", "structure my course", "turn this reading list into a schedule", "draft a course outline", "make a syllabus for Econ 7xx", or "map weeks to lectures". Economics-aware (PhD metrics/micro/macro sequences, undergrad); generic enough for any field.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow☆ 1,6592026年9月28日 更新
哈耶克 × 米塞斯 × Claude 三人对话。奥派经济学视角的多角色讨论。 触发方式:/dbs-chatroom-austrian、/chatroom-austrian、/奥派、「奥派聊天室」 Austrian economics chatroom. Hayek × Mises × Claude debate. Trigger: /dbs-chatroom-austrian, /chatroom-austrian, /奥派, "Austrian chat"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pluviobyte/rnskill☆ 1,6422026年9月21日 更新
dontbesilent 概念拆解。用维特根斯坦 + 奥派经济学的方法,把模糊的商业概念拆到原子级别。 触发方式:/dbs-deconstruct、/拆概念、「帮我拆解这个概念」「这个词到底什么意思」 Concept deconstruction using Wittgenstein + Austrian economics framework. Trigger: /dbs-deconstruct, "deconstruct this concept", "what does this really mean"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pluviobyte/rnskill☆ 1,6422026年9月21日 更新
Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them. Use when asked to validate my business idea, is this a good business idea, test my side hustle, or should I start this. Produces a read on the core assumptions the idea depends on, who the customer really is and whether the pain is real, the cheapest experiments to test demand before building, a rough viability check (market, competition, economics), and a go/refine/rethink call — honest, not a cheerleader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills☆ 1,4412026年10月13日 更新
Explain a cap table, dilution, SAFEs, option pools, and round mechanics in plain English with the actual math. Use when asked to explain dilution, model a SAFE or priced round, size an option pool, understand a term sheet's economics, or figure out who owns what after a raise. Produces a worked ownership breakdown before/after the round, the dilution math step by step, and the traps founders miss. Not legal or financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills☆ 1,4412026年10月13日 更新
Decode an employment benefits package into what it's actually worth and where the fine print bites. Use when someone asks 'is this offer good', 'decode my benefits package', 'what does my equity actually mean', or 'what should I ask HR before signing'. Produces a benefit-by-benefit decode with real dollar values, ranked red flags (vesting cliffs, clawbacks, 'discretionary' bonuses, unlimited-PTO economics), and the questions to ask HR before signing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills☆ 1,4412026年10月13日 更新
Use when extensions, edge cases, or applied robustness checks are missing for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering theory extensions (relaxed assumptions, alternative concepts, perturbations) and applied/experimental robustness. Decides which extensions earn their place; it does not prove the main result (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when the model setup, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — the central skill for a theory-first paper. Builds the model to the AEJ: Micro bar (clean, general, well-motivated result); it does not check whether your theorem is correct.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when positioning an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a systems contribution. AgSy readers span agronomy, modelling, livestock, economics, environment, and food-system science, so the paper must engage the systems and modelling literatures they expect — not only one subfield. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when presenting results for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — propositions, numerical examples, schematic theory figures, and empirical/experimental tables. Builds exhibits to AEA house norms; it does not derive the results (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when building or revising exhibits for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript — impulse-response figures, fan charts, model-fit overlays, and regression/moment tables — to AEA house standards and macro conventions. Formatting and clarity; it does not generate the underlying estimates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) via the AEA submission system — single-blind review, the 100-word abstract, JEL classification, the submission fee, format, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when drafting the response letter and revision plan after an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) R&R. Structures the reply to theory referees (correctness, generality, exposition) and editor; it does not re-derive the result (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission. Pre-empts the objections theory referees raise and reads the editorial process; it does not draft the response letter (see aejmic-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when revising prose, the abstract, or the introduction of an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript for AEA house style and the broad-interest macro arc. Late-stage polish on framing and clarity; it does not fix identification, the model, or exhibits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when the question is what makes the result tight or what the data identify for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering both (a) structural/empirical-IO and experimental identification and (b) for pure theory, which assumptions drive the result and how robust the mechanism is. Stress-tests credibility; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when deciding which aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when prose buries the result or the abstract/intro do not land for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript. Applies AEA house style and the theory-paper intro arc; it does not produce the result (see aejmic-theory-model) or build exhibits (see aejmic-tables-figures).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when deciding which aejmac-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when assembling the proof appendix and any code/data deposit for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript under the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Covers proof appendices for pure theory plus numerical/structural/experimental code; it does not run your estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when the contribution of an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript is fuzzy or oversold relative to the closest existing results. Stakes the theorem-relative delta against the nearest theory; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model) or frame the prose (see aejmic-writing-style).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when the quantitative model is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript — DSGE, New Keynesian, heterogeneous-agent (HANK / Aiyagari-Bewley), or structural estimation — and calibration, parameter identification, solution accuracy, or counterfactual validity need discipline. For empirical shock identification see aejmac-identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) decision letter has arrived (R&R or reject-with-comments) and you need a response-letter strategy and revision plan. Plans the rebuttal and revision; it does not run new identification, model, or robustness work itself (route to those skills).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新
Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript needs a model to interpret, discipline, or structure its empirical estimates — not to lead the paper. Calibrates how much theory belongs in an empirical-first journal and where it goes; it does not design the identification (aeja-identification) or build a standalone structural estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2482026年9月27日 更新