「grill」の検索結果

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

タスク進行中に、続行・即出荷・方向転換のどれが妥当かを、fresh なサブエージェント1体に状況サマリだけ渡して裁定させる。/gal-check 実行時、「ずれてない？」「このまま続けていい？」「ギャルに聞いて」等の方向確認の依頼時、外部レビューループの打ち切り条件に達した時に使用。成果物の中身は読まない。境界: 成果物のレビューは pr-review、計画の穴の対話検証は grilling。

Facilitate Kimball-style dimensional (data warehouse / BI) modeling sessions through conversation, producing DimML (Dimensional Modeling Language, YAML) as the primary artifact plus a bus-matrix + star-schema HTML. Use whenever the user wants to design fact tables, dimensions, a star schema, or a bus matrix — declaring grain, choosing SCD types, identifying conformed dimensions and measures (additivity) — by grilling one step at a time. Also invoke for refining an existing DimML, or when the user says "ディメンショナル・モデリング", "ディメンションモデリング", "スタースキーマ", "バスマトリクス", "ファクト表を設計したい", "グレインを決めたい", "DimML を育てたい", "Kimball で整理したい".

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model and sharpens terminology. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions; propose documentation updates for approval as decisions crystallise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The interview primitive for putting open decisions to an owner. Use on 'grill me', 'stress-test this', or 'what do you need from me before you build this', and whenever a plan, scope, spec, vision, or question ledger needs owner rulings. NOT for steps only a human can perform (use a guided session).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (GLOSSARY.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly stress-test a plan or design through a one-question-at-a-time interview that researches available context first and includes a recommended answer with every question. Use when the user asks to "grill me", wants a plan/design challenged, or needs decisions resolved before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a concrete requirements decision, create one bounded static interview packet, or run an explicitly user-invoked frontier batch over a plan, decision, or idea; trigger on explicit grill/interview/refinement intent or a named material ambiguity, not on ordinary planning, implementation, research, test-plan, report-style review, or BUILD work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

一度の対話では収まらない大きな企画や変更を、決めるべき問いと依存関係に整理します。課題管理ツールに判断の記録を残し、実行に移るまでの道筋を明らかにするスキル。

• 複数の対話にまたがる大きな計画
• 未決事項と依存関係の整理
• 共同作業で判断の経緯を共有

Adversarial plan interview before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an explicitly requested decision interview and record each settled decision in durable project documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an explicitly requested decision interview and record each settled decision in durable project documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a goal as a project: you coordinate. Use for "agents <task>", "take this to done", "work on this in parallel", "what are my threads doing", "pick up <slug>", "resume <slug>", "keep going until it is merged". Under `/agents` you do the work yourself unless it needs several lanes or a long wait — you judge; the plan line says why. No target you could verify (a file, API, number or measure) → the grill interview first, not threads. Read this skill before proposing anything for `/agents`: without it a proposal is in-session subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a mock interview for a specific job description. Plays the interviewer in a chosen round (recruiter screen, hiring manager, behavioral, coding, system design, case, product sense, panel), persona and difficulty; asks one question at a time, probes vague answers, and gives quote-backed rubric scores after each answer (coach mode) or at the end (realistic). Model answers use only the user's real experience. Use when the user says "mock interview me", "interview me for this job", "practice interview", "pretend you're the interviewer", "grill me for this role", "run a behavioral round", "quick recruiter screen", "hiring-manager mock", "system design mock" or "case interview practice". With Reactive Resume MCP it reads the application and stories and logs the session. For a story bank, company brief, questions to ask or a real-interview debrief, interview-prep; for scheduling or thank-you notes, job-application-manager; for fixing the resume, resume-tailor; for negotiation practice, offer-negotiation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive voice-narrated tutorial on whatever the current conversation is about — teaches the topic beat by beat with ASCII diagrams in the terminal while speaking the actual lesson content aloud, asking one question per beat and quizzing until the ideas land. USE WHEN teach me, /teach-me, tutorial, teach me this, walk me through this interactively, explain this like a lesson, learn mode, quiz me, help me actually understand what we just did. NOT FOR plain written explanations with no dialogue (just answer directly), authored/published content, or discovery interviews that shape a half-formed idea (use grill-me).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

苏格拉底诘问式研究选题Skill。通过连续追问帮你厘清研究思路、聚焦研究子领域、明确研究问题(RQ)，识别出未被研究过的新意选题。触发词：帮我选题/研究问题不清晰/想做一个有新意的论文/不断问我问题/厘清思路

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interrogate the brief before a line is built — ask only the questions whose answers change the work, and put every unasked decision on the record as a stated assumption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay on the fast path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

>Ce skill génère des sujets d'entraînement pour les deux épreuves écrites de consultation du CRFPA : l'épreuve de droit des obligations (tronc commun) et l'épreuve de spécialité (civil, affaires, social, pénal, administratif, international et européen, fiscal). Chaque sujet est accompagné d'une grille de notation détaillée sur 20 points. Vous ciblez un thème précis, ou vous laissez le skill procéder à un tirage au sort couvrant l'ensemble du programme. Connexion aux MCP OpenLegi et GoodLegal requise : toutes les références d'articles et d'arrêts sont vérifiées sur les sources officielles, sans citation inventée

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Index analytiques sourcés du corpus réglementaire et doctrinal sur la gouvernance des émetteurs cotés français (rapports AMF et HCGE 2020-2025, guide d'application HCGE, rapport sénatorial Rietmann/Gay, Code AFEP-MEDEF, sources légales et européennes). À utiliser pour : (1) retrouver une position, une statistique ou une citation exacte avec sa source et sa page ; (2) analyser l'évolution longitudinale des positions AMF/HCGE/ESMA sur un thème ; (3) appliquer la grille d'analyse en 13 blocs (A-M) à un émetteur. Déclencher pour toute question sur la gouvernance d'une société cotée française : conseil d'administration, indépendance des administrateurs, comités, rémunération des dirigeants, say on pay, say on climate, assemblée générale, droits des actionnaires, plans de succession, mixité, RSE/CSRD, comply-or-explain, name and shame AMF, soft law AFEP-MEDEF, recommandations AMF, positions HCGE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。