Prepare a local LangBot development and testing environment for an AI agent. Use when setting up WSL or Linux development, shared local URL variables, proxy variables, backend/frontend startup, Playwright MCP browser access, GitHub OAuth browser login, persisted Chrome profiles, or future Codex computer-use environment paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
langbot-app/LangBot☆ 1.8万2026年10月13日 更新
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs☆ 1.4万2026年10月11日 更新
Write minimal, reliable bug reproducers (repros) for any project. Use when: (1) a bug report or issue needs a test that reliably demonstrates the failure, (2) converting a described failure scenario into runnable code, (3) minimizing an existing complex test to its essential trigger conditions. Covers the full repro workflow: failure characterization, scope selection, writing the repro, verifying it fails for the right reason, and minimizing to the smallest possible trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
apache/cassandra☆ 1万2026年10月11日 更新
Execute Python scripts reliably using file-first approach instead of heredoc
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HKUDS/OpenSpace☆ 7,7552026年8月13日 更新
Comprehensive secrets extraction methodology targeting CI/CD environments across all major platforms. Covers environment variable extraction from build contexts, exploitation of vault and secrets-manager misconfigurations (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager), runner and agent token abuse for lateral movement, OIDC federation attacks exploiting trust relationships between CI/CD providers and cloud platforms, build log leakage analysis for inadvertently exposed credentials, cache poisoning techniques for credential exfiltration, platform-specific credential store exploitation (GitHub Actions secrets, GitLab CI variables, Jenkins credential providers), service connection and service account abuse in Azure DevOps and GCP, and Docker registry credential theft from build environments. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1552 (Unsecured Credentials) and its sub-techniques. Each section provides enumeration procedures, extraction techniques, and post-exploitation pivoting guidance for using recovered secrets to expand access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SnailSploit/Claude-Red☆ 7,4782026年10月13日 更新
**MANDATORY prerequisite** — you MUST invoke this skill BEFORE every `use_figma` tool call. NEVER call `use_figma` directly without loading this skill first. Skipping it causes common, hard-to-debug failures. Trigger whenever the user wants to perform a write action or a unique read action that requires JavaScript execution in the Figma file context — e.g. create/edit/delete nodes, set up variables or tokens, build components and variants, modify auto-layout or fills, bind variables to properties, or inspect file structure programmatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
openai/plugins☆ 7,4312026年10月8日 更新
**MANDATORY prerequisite** — you MUST invoke this skill BEFORE every `use_figma` tool call. NEVER call `use_figma` directly without loading this skill first. Skipping it causes common, hard-to-debug failures. Trigger whenever the user wants to perform a write action or a unique read action that requires JavaScript execution in the Figma file context — e.g. create/edit/delete nodes, set up variables or tokens, build components and variants, modify auto-layout or fills, bind variables to properties, or inspect file structure programmatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Devin-AXIS/iPolloWork☆ 6,9292026年10月13日 更新
Environment diagnostic skill for SenseNova-Skills project. Checks that sn-image-base is properly installed and configured, validates dependencies and environment variables. Prompts user to configure missing required variables and saves them to .env file. After configuration, reloads environment and suggests agent restart if needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenSenseNova/SenseNova-Skills☆ 5,7502026年10月9日 更新
Econometrics skill for Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). Activates when the user asks about: "regression discontinuity", "RDD", "RD design", "sharp RDD", "fuzzy RDD", "running variable", "forcing variable", "cutoff", "bandwidth selection", "local linear regression", "McCrary test", "density test", "RDROBUST", "continuity assumption", "donut hole RDD", "geographic RDD", "断点回归", "回归不连续", "运行变量", "截断值", "带宽选择", "精确断点", "模糊断点", "密度检验", "局部线性回归"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
This skill covers causal inference methods in observational and quasi-experimental settings. Use when the user is implementing, choosing between, or debugging causal identification strategies — including instrumental variables, difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, synthetic control, or matching estimators. Triggers on "causal effect", "identification strategy", "instrumental variable", "2SLS", "GMM", "difference-in-differences", "DiD", "staggered treatment", "regression discontinuity", "RDD", "synthetic control", "matching", "propensity score", "IPW", "AIPW", "doubly robust", "LATE", "ATT", "ATE", "parallel trends", "exclusion restriction", "first stage", "weak instruments", or "endogeneity".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
Econometrics skill for instrumental variables and treatment effect estimation. Activates when the user asks about: "instrumental variables", "IV estimation", "2SLS", "two-stage least squares", "endogeneity", "weak instruments", "first stage", "Sargan test", "overidentification", "propensity score matching", "PSM", "average treatment effect", "ATT", "LATE", "local average treatment effect", "endogenous regressor", "instrument validity", "工具变量", "两阶段最小二乘", "内生性", "弱工具变量", "倾向得分匹配", "平均处理效应", "处理效应", "局部平均处理效应"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
Extract the full design language from any website URL. Produces 8 output files including AI-optimized markdown, visual HTML preview, Tailwind config, React theme, shadcn/ui theme, Figma variables, W3C design tokens, and CSS variables. Also runs WCAG accessibility scoring. Use when user says 'extract design', 'get design system', 'design language', 'design tokens', 'what colors/fonts does this site use', or '/extract-design'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manavarya09/design-extract☆ 4,2292026年10月9日 更新
Analyze transcription factor motif accessibility variability using chromVAR. Use when identifying which TF motifs show variable accessibility across samples or conditions in ATAC-seq data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills☆ 3,0632026年7月21日 更新
Use when the user asks to "design an email A/B test", "set up a multivariate subject/CTA test", "run a send-time test", "build a hold-out group", or "is this email result statistically and practically material?"; produces a falsifiable hypothesis, one-variable-per-cell matrix, sample-size/MDE/duration/power plan, and an effect/uncertainty read from own ESP data. Applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the helper never chooses a business action. Not for EQS/vetoes or writing the email. 邮件AB测试设计/多变量测试/发送时间测试/留出组/显著性判定
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills☆ 2,9362026年10月13日 更新
Establishes what something actually costs — fixed, variable and mixed cost behavior, absorption versus variable costing, job-order, process and activity-based methods, breakeven and operating leverage, and price/volume/mix decomposition. Use this to set a price floor, explain why revenue or margin moved, decide make versus buy, judge whether a product line earns its place, or work out how an allocation basis is distorting a reported margin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
cbrock84/headcount☆ 2,0422026年9月18日 更新
Designs complete research plans that integrate clinical variables with multi-omics data from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a study that combines clinical variables with transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, or related omics layers for mechanism interpretation, biomarker development, risk stratification, treatment-response analysis, or translational use. It should define the clinical use case, alignment across data layers, feature-reduction and fusion logic, modeling route, mechanism-interpretation layer, validation ladder, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, platform coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aipoch/medical-research-skills☆ 1,9482026年9月17日 更新
Use when running prognostic survival analysis on a clinical cohort with time-to-event data to estimate univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, export result tables, and generate forest plots. NOT for: nomogram construction, calibration curves, time-dependent ROC analysis, or model training/feature selection beyond the built-in univariate screening rule.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aipoch/medical-research-skills☆ 1,9482026年9月17日 更新
Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
aipoch/medical-research-skills☆ 1,9482026年9月17日 更新
Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
michael-denyer/pstack-claude☆ 1,8982026年10月13日 更新
Classify environmental and meteorological variables into driver categories for attribution analysis. Use when you need to group multiple variables into meaningful factor categories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
benchflow-ai/skillsbench☆ 1,8422026年10月13日 更新
Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
backnotprop/pstack☆ 1,7562026年10月12日 更新
You are an SLO (Service Level Objective) expert specializing in implementing reliability standards and error budget-based practices. Design SLO frameworks, define SLIs, and build monitoring that balances reliability with delivery velocity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills☆ 1,7502026年10月1日 更新