「investigate」の検索結果

Investigate consistently failing SGLang CI tests by extracting the failure signature from scheduled or rerun workflows, bisecting the passing/failing commit window, checking runner or hardware specificity, and optionally reproducing on a remote GPU host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune detection logic for reducing false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes Windows Security, System, and Sysmon event logs in Splunk to detect authentication attacks, privilege escalation, persistence mechanisms, and lateral movement using SPL queries mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate Windows-based threats, build detection queries, or perform forensic timeline analysis of Windows endpoints and domain controllers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate domain permutations with dnstwist and check DNS resolution to detect typosquatting, homograph phishing, and brand impersonation domains registered against your organization. Use when asked to monitor for lookalike domains, investigate a phishing domain, or assess brand-impersonation risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate supply chain attack artifacts including trojanized software updates, compromised build pipelines, and sideloaded dependencies to identify intrusion vectors and scope of compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leverages Splunk Enterprise Security and SPL (Search Processing Language) to investigate security incidents through log correlation, timeline reconstruction, and anomaly detection. Covers Windows event logs, firewall logs, proxy logs, and authentication data analysis. Activates for requests involving Splunk investigation, SPL queries, SIEM log analysis, security event correlation, or log-based incident investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run read-only deep repository analysis and return a ranked synthesis with explicit confidence, concrete file references, and clear evidence-vs-inference boundaries. Use when a user says 'analyze', 'investigate', 'why does', 'what's causing', or needs grounded cross-file explanation before any changes are proposed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a GitHub issue or reported bug the way a seasoned maintainer would — form an independent model before reading the thread's theories, trace the mechanism and history, verify the diagnosis, and return a concise briefing with a verdict and fix direction. Use for triage, root-cause analysis, or re-investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing. Use for any PR review, self-review, or re-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a bug from a GitHub issue, following the reproduce-first workflow. Use when the user asks to fix a bug, investigate a GitHub issue, or debug a user-reported problem. Takes a GitHub issue URL or number as input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate stuck runs and execution failures by tracing Symphony and Codex logs with issue/session identifiers; use when runs stall, retry repeatedly, or fail unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain the last message, or a supplied file, link, or passage, in plain language a person follows on the first read. Use when the user invokes wtf because they did not follow something. Use ce-explain to investigate how or why code works, and ce-noslop to rewrite prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and ask questions about coding agent session history across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Use when asking what was worked on, what was tried before, how a problem was investigated across sessions, what happened recently, or any question about past agent sessions. Also use when the user references prior sessions, previous attempts, or past investigations — even without saying 'sessions' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the tests, run one spec, run e2e locally or on Daytona, investigate a skipped spec. Use for executing @openwork/testkit agent-first verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a website, investigate its real search opportunities, and deliver a short data-backed report on the few changes most likely to grow organic traffic that converts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage OpenSEO production errors in Cloudflare Workers Observability — verified query recipes, counting gotchas, and a known-noise filter list applied automatically. Use when asked to review Cloudflare logs/observability, count OOMs or worker errors, compare error rates between periods, or investigate a prod error spike.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and review evidence-backed workflows with Screenpipe tools and shared drafts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. Use when writing new detection rules, tuning existing rules, validating syntax, testing logic against historical telemetry, or evaluating detection coverage against threat intelligence blogs, CVE disclosures, and Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs) using synthetic UDM events and long-running coverage analysis. Don't use for alert triage (use secops-triage), deep forensic event reconstruction on infected hosts (use secops-investigate), or case management operations (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates Google Cloud networking issues by analyzing GCP logs, metrics, and diagnostics. Use when investigating dropped network traffic, packet drops, drop reasons, VPC Flow Logs (including Private Service Connect / PSC, serverless / App Engine Direct VPC, and cost estimation), NAT, firewall, or threat logs, querying latency and throughput metrics, or running Connectivity Tests for path diagnostics. Don't use for generic VM management or non-observability tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for proactive threat hunting in Google SecOps. Use when proactively hunting for threats, retroactively analyzing indicators of compromise (IoCs), performing prevalence searches across enterprise events, hunting for MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or detecting behavioral and statistical outliers using UDM queries. Don't use for incoming alert triage (use secops-triage), active incident response and timeline deep-dives on a known breach (use secops-investigate), or detection rule authoring (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for deep security incident and entity investigations in Google SecOps. Use when investigating cases, analyzing entities (hosts, IPs, domains, hashes, users), extracting and searching UDM events, performing asset and user timeline analysis, and detecting lateral movement across enterprise networks. Don't use for detection rule authoring or YARA-L tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), proactive hypothesis-driven hunting (use secops-hunt), initial alert triage (use secops-triage), or basic case status updates (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。