3,370 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Quality gates determinísticos para PostgreSQL. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate PostgreSQL", "quality gate Postgres", migrations ou schema drift PostgreSQL, constraints ou índices PostgreSQL, EXPLAIN, plano de consulta ou baseline para PostgreSQL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code quality standards for OneKey. Use when fixing lint warnings, running pre-commit tasks, handling unused variables, writing comments, or ensuring code quality. All comments must be in English. Triggers on lint, linting, eslint, oxlint, tsc, type check, unused variable, comment, documentation, spellcheck, code quality, pre-commit, yarn lint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces minimum quality thresholds in CI including code coverage, linting, type checking, and security scanning. Provides required checks, PR rules, and automated enforcement. Use for "quality gates", "CI checks", "code quality", or "PR requirements".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Great Expectations, dbt tests, anomaly detection, and data contracts for data quality. Activate on: data quality, data validation, Great Expectations, data contract, anomaly detection, SLA, freshness check, schema validation. NOT for: dbt model structure (use dbt-analytics-engineer), schema evolution (use schema-evolution-manager).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Codeのファイル編集時に、Planktonで自動整形とコード検査を行う設定を支援するスキル。残った違反の自動修正や再検査、検査ルールの保護も扱います。
予測市場や取引エージェントの処理を、規約・データ品質・秘密情報・プライバシー・取引実行の観点で点検し、問題点と必要な対策を整理するスキル。
Claude Codeの終了時に学習記録の更新日時やディスク空き容量を確認し、条件に応じて完了を止めるスキル。会話中の手順省略を示す表現にも警告します。
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PluginEval quality methodology, covering dimensions, rubrics, and scoring formulas. Use this skill when understanding how plugin quality is measured, when interpreting a low score on a specific dimension, when deciding how to improve a skill's triggering accuracy or orchestration fitness, when setting score thresholds for your marketplace, or when explaining quality badges to external partners like Neon.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze unit economics for PE targets — ARR cohorts, LTV/CAC, net retention, payback periods, revenue quality, and margin waterfall. Essential for software/SaaS, recurring revenue, and subscription businesses. Use when evaluating revenue quality, building a cohort analysis, or assessing customer economics. Triggers on "unit economics", "cohort analysis", "ARR analysis", "LTV CAC", "net retention", "revenue quality", or "customer economics".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create premium, Awwwards-quality website designs as React (.jsx) components that look like they were built by a top-tier agency charging $50k+ per project. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a website, landing page, portfolio, or web component that should look expensive, premium, luxury, editorial, high-end, or agency-quality. Also trigger when the user mentions Awwwards, FWA, award-winning design, or references brands like Apple, Aesop, Bottega Veneta, Stripe, or any luxury/fashion/design-forward brand. Trigger when the user says things like "make it look professional", "make it look expensive", "I want it to look really good", "high quality design", "not generic", or expresses dissatisfaction with typical AI-generated website aesthetics. Do NOT trigger for dashboards, admin panels, internal tools, or functional UI where aesthetics are secondary to utility — the standard frontend-design skill handles those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs quality control on single-cell RNA-seq data (.h5ad or .h5 files) using scverse best practices with MAD-based filtering and comprehensive visualizations. Use when users request QC analysis, filtering low-quality cells, assessing data quality, or following scverse/scanpy best practices for single-cell analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate, test, and score the quality of skills within the claude-skills ecosystem. Comprehensive meta-skill: structure validation, Python script testing (syntax + imports + runtime + output format), multi-dimensional quality scoring with letter grades and tier classification (BASIC/STANDARD/POWERFUL). Use when authoring a new skill, auditing existing skills for tier promotion, setting up pre-commit hooks for skill quality, or integrating skill QA into CI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities". Do NOT use for accessibility (use web-accessibility), SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive multi-area audits (use web-quality-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。