147 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarksUse when "agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent, testing, evaluation, benchmark, agents, reliability, quality" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Spawns parallel subagents for comprehensive analysis. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Used to invoke the PXMeter tool for rigorous quality assessment of biomolecular structure prediction models (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, small molecules). This skill covers single-sample CIF evaluations and large-scale dataset benchmarks, providing rich result parsing support. Trigger this skill when the user asks to "run PXMeter", "compare PDB/CIF evaluation results of different tools", "check benchmark scores", or asks "how accurate is the structure generated by the model".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a comprehensive milestone progress review including feature completeness, quality metrics, risk assessment, and go/no-go recommendation. Use at milestone checkpoints or when evaluating readiness for a milestone deadline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 4: Spec. Full implementation readiness package including solution design, UX direction, tech stack, backlog, MVP prioritization, risk assessment, and AI architecture for Claude Code projects — CLAUDE.md, skill mapping, AI specs, sprint planning, quality gates. Triggers on "spec", "phase 4", "build ready", "implementation plan", "CLAUDE.md", "sprint planning", "backlog", "AI spec", or after Phase I exit checklist is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures technology diligence with architecture review, code quality assessment, scalability analysis, and technical debt evaluation. Use when evaluating startup technology, assessing engineering teams, or reviewing technical infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses GP track records for secondary pricing with fund-level attribution, unrealized portfolio assessment, and consistency analysis. Use when evaluating GP track records, analyzing fund performance consistency, or assessing manager quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates sovereign creditworthiness with fiscal analysis, external vulnerability, political risk, and institutional quality assessment. Use when analyzing sovereign risk, assessing country credit, or evaluating government bond exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates PE sponsor-backed credit with sponsor track record, equity contribution, and governance assessment. Use when analyzing sponsor-backed loans, assessing sponsor quality, or evaluating sponsor support dynamics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates market structure dynamics with order book analysis, spread decomposition, and information asymmetry assessment. Use when analyzing market structure, evaluating trading venues, or assessing execution quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates market breadth with advance-decline analysis, new high/low tracking, and sector participation assessment. Use when analyzing market breadth, assessing rally quality, or identifying divergences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates alternative trading systems with fill rate analysis, information leakage assessment, and venue toxicity measurement. Use when analyzing dark pools, evaluating ATS venues, or assessing execution venue quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run CodeQL and Semgrep static analysis with SARIF output for vulnerability detection, code quality assessment, and security compliance scanning across multiple languages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Purify water from wild sources using boiling, filtration, and chemical methods. Covers source assessment and priority ranking, sediment pre-filtering, method selection (boiling, chemical, UV, filter), altitude-adjusted boiling procedure, chemical treatment dosages, and safe storage practices. Use when needing drinking water in a wilderness setting, when available water sources are of unknown quality, in an emergency survival situation where dehydration is a risk, or when making water safe for cooking or wound cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish cut gemstones to final finish using progressive abrasive sequences. Covers pre-polish sanding, polishing compounds, lap selection, and quality assessment for both cabochons and faceted stones. Use when a cabochon or faceted stone has completed cutting and is ready for polishing, selecting the correct compound and lap for a specific species, troubleshooting a polish that will not reach full lustre (orange peel, haze, scratches), or re-polishing a stone with surface wear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a GxP training programme covering training needs analysis by role, curriculum design (regulatory awareness, system-specific, data integrity), competency assessment criteria, training record retention, and retraining triggers for SOP revisions and incidents. Use when a new validated system requires user training before go-live, an audit finding cites inadequate training, organisational changes introduce new roles, a periodic programme review is due, or inspection preparation requires demonstrating training adequacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a GxP audit of computerized systems and processes. Covers audit planning, opening meetings, evidence collection, finding classification (critical/major/minor), CAPA generation, closing meetings, report writing, and follow-up verification. Use for scheduled internal audits, supplier qualification audits, pre-inspection readiness assessments, for-cause audits triggered by deviations or data integrity concerns, or periodic compliance posture reviews of validated systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Online presence audit — Google Business Profile completeness, Yelp listing quality, website assessment, online ordering setup, third-party platform presence
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。