「ratings」の検索結果

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US management consultancies — strategy, operations, executive coaching, leadership development, org-development/change management, PMO/program management, sales/revenue operations consulting. Triggers on "find me three top strategy consultancies in California", "shortlist boutique ops-consulting firms with healthcare experience", "we need an executive coach for our new CEO", or "pull contact info for these 10 consulting firm domains", even when described indirectly (post-merger integration help, change-management partner, fractional COO). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house strategy hires, "help me build a strategy" do-the-work asks, framework comparisons (Lean vs Agile, BCG matrix, etc.), academic/MBA-program questions, life/career coaching for individuals, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US accounting and tax firms (CPA firms) — financial-statement audit, SOC 1/2 audit, corporate tax, bookkeeping for businesses, advisory/fractional CFO, M&A diligence, 409A valuations, R&D tax credits, IPO readiness, sales-and-use tax. Triggers on "find me a CPA firm for our delaware c-corp series A audit", "shortlist three audit firms with SaaS experience", "we need a tax advisor for our M&A", or "pull contact info for these 10 accounting firm domains", even when described indirectly (audit our books, fractional CFO support, file our 1120). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer tax preparation (1040, individual estate, retirement planning), in-house controller/CFO hires, "how do I file my taxes" DIY questions, accounting-software comparisons (QuickBooks vs Xero), non-US firms, individual freelance bookkeepers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US design and creative agencies — graphic design, UX/UI, product design, brand identity, packaging, illustration, motion design, and creative direction. Triggers on "find me a UX/UI design agency for our SaaS product", "shortlist three brand-identity studios in NY", "packaging design firm for a CPG launch", or "pull contact info for these 10 design studio domains", even when described indirectly (brand refresh, design our app, build our visual system). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-marketing-agency for marketing-led engagements where design is one of several services. Defer to find-web-developer when the deliverable is a built website. Skip in-house designer hires, "design me a logo" DIY asks, design-software comparisons, consumer/personal-design (weddings, hobby projects), non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US engineering firms — civil, structural, MEP, mechanical, electrical, geotechnical, transportation, environmental, and manufacturing. **For real-world engineering (buildings, infrastructure, manufacturing) — NOT software engineering.** Triggers on "find civil engineering firms in Florida for transportation", "shortlist three structural engineering firms with high-rise experience", "MEP consultancy for a hospital project", or "pull contact info for these 12 engineering firm domains", even when described indirectly (PE-stamped drawings, building-permit review). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer software-dev / "engineering team" / SaaS-architecture asks to find-software-developer. Skip in-house engineering-manager hires, DIY questions, software-product comparisons (Revit, AutoCAD), non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US SEO agencies — technical SEO, on-page/off-page, link-building, content-led SEO, local SEO, ecommerce SEO, B2B SEO, and SEO audits. Triggers on "find me an SEO agency in Texas", "shortlist three technical SEO consultancies for SaaS", "link-building and on-page for our ecommerce store", or "pull contact info for these 8 SEO firm domains", even when described indirectly (organic traffic flat, improve Google rankings, search visibility). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings, third-party listings. Defer to find-marketing-agency when scope spans multiple marketing services beyond SEO. Skip SEM/PPC/paid-search asks, web-dev asks (use find-web-developer), "how do I rank" DIY questions, SEO tool recommendations (Ahrefs, Semrush), in-house SEO hires, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a rigorous, forward-looking technical audit with severity ratings and improvement directions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares credit rating agency presentations with methodology alignment, peer positioning, and target rating analysis. Use when advising on credit ratings, preparing rating agency meetings, or analyzing rating methodology impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants measurable accessibility, performance, responsive, theming, or anti-pattern findings—not when they mainly want an overall UX critique or final visual/detail polish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, responsive design, theming, and anti-patterns. Generate a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings. Report-only — documents issues for other skills to fix. Triggers on audit the design, check accessibility, technical review, performance audit, a11y check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-phase deep codebase review with severity ratings and structured output. Covers architecture, security, code quality, and UX/accessibility in a single coordinated pass. Produces a prioritized findings table suitable for direct conversion to GitHub issues via the create-github-issues skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentiment & Momentum Analysis — news sentiment scoring, social media buzz (Reddit/StockTwits/X), analyst ratings consensus, institutional 13F activity, insider trading signals, and short interest / squeeze potential. Returns Sentiment Score (0-100). Triggered by "trade sentiment <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, audit, or correct an electronic circuit from a product brief, native schematic, netlist, block diagram, or circuit description. Use for architecture and component-function review, power and logic-domain checks, reset and boot sequencing, bus ownership, ratings, timing, protection, safe states, component suitability, circuit bugs, or layout-facing electrical constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Calculate Wilson Score confidence intervals for ranking items by positive proportion with sample size correction. Use this skill when the user needs to rank products by ratings, sort content by approval rate, or build a 'best rated' list that accounts for sample size — even if they say 'rank by star rating', 'best rated with few reviews', or 'confidence-adjusted rating'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement collaborative filtering for recommendations based on user behavior patterns. Use this skill when the user needs to build a recommendation engine from user-item interaction data, find similar users or items, or predict ratings — even if they say 'users who bought this also bought', 'similar users', or 'recommend based on behavior'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bayesian averaging to rank items by combining observed ratings with prior expectations. Use this skill when the user needs to rank items with varying review counts, build a 'top rated' list that handles low-sample items fairly, or implement IMDB-style weighted rating — even if they say 'weighted average rating', 'IMDB formula', or 'ranking with prior'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

In-house legal workflows for contract review against playbooks, NDA triage with GREEN/YELLOW/RED ratings, compliance briefings, and vendor checks. Use when the user invokes /review-contract, /triage-nda, /legal-risk-assessment, or /vendor-check for organisation-standard legal analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical Engineer working in power systems — sizing a service or feeder from NEC demand factors, running a short-circuit study and checking breaker interrupting ratings, computing arc-flash incident energy and assigning a PPE category, checking protective-device coordination (selectivity), or reviewing a single-line diagram before construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Broadcast Program Director — diagnosing a ratings-book decline into cume vs. TSL causes, deciding whether a format flip is warranted versus a clock/rotation fix, setting spot-load and stopset structure against sales pressure, or clearing content through standards-and-practices and FCC compliance review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect content decay by identifying pages that are losing both clicks and impressions over a 90-day comparison window in Google Search Console. Surfaces pages with true long-term decline (not seasonal variation) and assigns decay severity ratings. Use when user says "content decay", "declining pages", "losing rankings", "pages losing traffic over time", or "90 day decline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects feature patterns that require a higher age rating than commonly submitted, enforcing Guideline 2.3.6 which requires age ratings to accurately reflect the app's content and social features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan code for security vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and exposed secrets. Use when a user asks to audit security, find vulnerabilities, check for OWASP issues, scan for secrets, review dependencies for CVEs, detect SQL injection, find XSS vulnerabilities, or harden an application. Covers OWASP Top 10, dependency auditing, secrets detection, and generates fix recommendations with severity ratings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。