「research synthesis」の検索結果

Evidence-first multi-step research with bounded parallel collection, contradiction checks, and cited synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Research] Use when you need to synthesize research findings into structured report using template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route ordinary public-web information tasks to the correct Tavily CLI operation. Use when the task concerns publicly accessible webpages and needs web discovery, clean extraction, URL mapping, same-site crawling, or public-web-only research, but the exact Tavily operation is not yet clear or several operations must be sequenced. Prefer the specific leaf skill when intent is clear: tavily-search for discovery without a URL, tavily-extract for known URLs, tavily-map for URL/site-structure discovery, tavily-crawl for content from many pages on one site, tavily-research for cited multi-source synthesis, and tavily-dynamic-search for programmatic filtering with context isolation. Do not use for named social/community/media/career/code platforms, login or cookie-dependent content, platform-native discussions, or cross-platform collection; use Agent Reach there. Do not use for local files, Git operations, deployments, or ordinary code editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standard Operating Procedures for web research, documentation lookup, evidence synthesis with citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize repeated themes from selected research conversations or notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any hypothesis, however fringe, into an argument map rather than a verdict: five independent lenses (consensus, skeptic, frontier, historian, experimental design), then a synthesis of for and against, evidence quality, a confidence tier and the cheapest decisive experiment. Triggers: "/research-swarm <hypothesis>", "map the arguments on X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run programmatic Tavily search and extraction while filtering raw results outside the main agent context. Use for multi-step or high-volume research where titles, snippets, and selected passages should be curated before synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep multi-source research synthesis — web, academic, patent, and internal KB cross-referencing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a question from the structured wiki before searching the web — "query the wiki", "what do we know about", synthesis request, cross-project research. Returns cited synthesis with wikilinks and counter-arguments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert web researcher using advanced search techniques and synthesis. Masters search operators, result filtering, and multi-source verification. Handles competitive analysis and fact-checking. Use PROACTIVELY for deep research, information gathering, or trend analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring a non-trivial Workflow for research, review, migration, or other multi-agent work, especially when the task needs multiple evidence sources, verification, or synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources. Use for research synthesis, reproducible literature searches, screening, citation checking, or preparing Markdown and PDF reviews. Tracks search coverage, records versus studies, and evidence limitations; supports meta-analysis planning but does not supply a meta-analysis engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an auditable evidence map for a contested technical choice, research synthesis, proposal review, or consequential decision. Use when Copilot must preserve supporting, contradicting, qualifying, and missing evidence with exact source regions instead of collapsing disagreement into prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive toolkit for product managers including RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, and go-to-market strategies. Use for feature prioritization, user research synthesis, requirement documentation, and product strategy development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a firm AI usage policy from published model policies, adapted to your practice profile — a research-and-synthesis tool whose output is a draft for attorney review and adoption, not a finished policy. Use when user says "draft an AI policy", "we need an AI policy", "build an AI usage policy", "our firm needs a GenAI policy", or similar requests to generate a first-cut internal AI policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user keeps paper notes inside an Obsidian project knowledge base and wants filesystem-first literature review, explicit agent-first Zotero ingestion, `Papers/` plus `Knowledge/` synthesis, collection-wide normalization, and a default literature canvas without Obsidian MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when papers are collected in Zotero but the user wants detailed reading notes, project-linked literature synthesis, collection-wide paper-note coverage checks, and a connected knowledge map inside the bound Obsidian project knowledge base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the same orchestration as `/efficient-fable` to any high-cost frontier model: delegate research, coding, and testing to cheaper subagents while keeping planning, synthesis, and final review with the expensive model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。