AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run programmatic Tavily search and extraction while filtering raw results outside the main agent context. Use for multi-step or high-volume research where titles, snippets, and selected passages should be curated before synthesis.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Search the web, filter results, and extract content so that raw search data never enters your context window. Only your curated print() output comes back.
A typical tvly search --include-raw-content returns 8 results × 30-50K chars each = ~300K characters of raw page content. If this enters your context window, you burn tokens reading navigation bars, cookie banners, and boilerplate — and your reasoning quality degrades under the noise. By processing results inside a Python script, only your print() output enters context — typically 1-3K characters of pure signal. That's a 100-200x reduction.
This skill replicates the architecture of Anthropic's Programmatic Tool Calling (PTC) for web search. PTC lets the model write code that orchestrates tool calls inside a sandbox — intermediate results stay in the sandbox, and only the final print() output reaches the model's context window.
This skill applies the same principle using local Python execution. The Python process is the sandbox. Variables in memory hold the raw data. Only what you print() crosses into your context window. You write the filtering logic — you decide what matters for each query.
Check tvly --version and tvly --status first. If the CLI is missing, use a
reviewed installation method:
uv tool install tavily-cli
# or: python -m pip install --user tavily-cli
Authenticate with tvly login or an approved environment secret. Never expose
a real API key in commands, logs, files, or chat.
NEVER run tvly as a bare command. Always process output through Python so you control what enters your context.
# WRONG — raw results flood your context
tvly search "quantum computing 2025" --json
# RIGHT — only your print() output enters context
tvly search "quantum computing 2025" --json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
data = json.load(sys.stdin)
for r in data['results']:
print(f'[{r[\"score\"]:.2f}] {r[\"title\"]}')
print(f' {r[\"url\"]}')
"
You need these to write correct filtering code.
{
"query": "string",
"answer": "string | null",
"results": [
{
"url": "string",
"title": "string",
"content": "string (snippet, ~500-1500 chars)",
"score": 0.0-1.0,
"raw_content": "string | null (full page, only with --include-raw-content)"
}
],
"response_time": 0.0
}
{
"results": [
{
"url": "string",
"title": "string",
"raw_content": "string (full page markdown)",
"images": []
}
],
"failed_results": [],
"response_time": 0.0
}
You have two building blocks and two ways to run them. Compose these however the query demands — there are no fixed patterns. You decide the approach based on what you need.
tvly search — returns titles, URLs, snippets, scores. Optionally includes full page content with --include-raw-content markdown.
tvly extract — fetches full page content for specific URLs. Use when you found a URL from search and need more detail.
Pipe mode — for simple filters (3-5 lines). Pipe tvly output into python3 -c:
tvly search "query" --json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
data = json.load(sys.stdin)
# your filtering code here
"
Heredoc mode — for anything more complex. Single Bash call, clean multi-line Python, no escaping, no temp files:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'search', 'query', '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL
)
data = json.loads(raw)
for r in data['results']:
print(f"[{r['score']:.2f}] {r['title']}")
print(f" {r['url']}")
PYEOF
Single-quoted heredocs (<< 'PYEOF') don't interpret anything — no escaping needed. This is the default for most tasks.
Script mode — only when you will reuse the same script across multiple turns. Do NOT write one-shot scripts to /tmp/. If you run it once, use a heredoc.
Important: save DATA to /tmp/, not CODE. Writing /tmp/tavily_results.json (data for later turns) = good. Writing /tmp/my_filter.py (one-shot code) = wasteful — use a heredoc instead.
For complex queries, you often need to explore before you extract — just like PTC, where the model searches, sees titles, decides which results to drill into, then extracts.
The key: save raw results to a file, then process them in separate steps. The file is your persistent state between turns.
Search and print only titles + scores. Save raw results to disk for later turns:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'search', 'solid-state battery commercialization 2025',
'--include-raw-content', 'markdown', '--max-results', '8', '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL
)
data = json.loads(raw)
# Save raw results — this stays on disk, never enters context
with open('/tmp/tavily_results.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(data, f)
# Print only what you need to decide next steps
print(f'{len(data["results"])} results saved to /tmp/tavily_results.json\n')
for i, r in enumerate(data['results']):
print(f'[{i}] [{r["score"]:.2f}] {r["title"][:90]}')
print(f' {r["url"]}')
print(f' {r["content"][:150]}')
print()
PYEOF
Context receives: ~800 tokens of titles + snippets. The 300K of raw page content is in /tmp/tavily_results.json, untouched.
Now you know what's in the results. Write targeted extraction — you decide which results to drill into and what to filter for:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
data = json.load(open('/tmp/tavily_results.json'))
# You chose these indices based on the titles you saw in turn 1
for i in [0, 2, 5]:
r = data['results'][i]
raw = r.get('raw_content', '') or ''
if not raw:
continue
print(f'## {r["title"]}')
print(f'URL: {r["url"]}\n')
# You write the filtering logic based on the query
# This example extracts paragraphs about specific companies
for para in raw.split('\n\n'):
para = para.strip()
if len(para) > 80 and any(kw in para.lower() for kw in
['toyota', 'quantumscape', 'samsung', 'commercializ', 'production']):
print(para)
print()
print('---\n')
PYEOF
Context receives: ~600 tokens of targeted content. You made the decision about what to keep.
If you need more from a specific source:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
# Fetch a specific URL you identified
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'extract', 'https://example.com/article', '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL
)
data = json.loads(raw)
page = data['results'][0]
content = page.get('raw_content', '')
# Save for potential further processing
with open('/tmp/page_detail.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(content)
# Print only the section you care about
for line in content.split('\n'):
if any(kw in line.lower() for kw in ['timeline', '2025', '2026', 'mass production']):
print(line.strip())
PYEOF
Single turn (pipe mode or one script): when you know upfront what you're looking for. Specific factual queries, known keywords.
Multi-turn (save + explore + extract): when you need to see what's available before deciding what to extract. Open-ended research, complex topics, queries where you don't know the right keywords yet.
tvly search "Python 3.13 release date" --max-results 5 --json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
data = json.load(sys.stdin)
for r in data['results'][:3]:
print(f'{r[\"title\"]}')
print(f'{r[\"content\"][:300]}')
print()
"
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'search', 'NVIDIA Q4 2025 earnings revenue',
'--include-raw-content', 'markdown', '--max-results', '5',
'--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL
)
data = json.loads(raw)
for r in data['results']:
raw_content = r.get('raw_content', '') or ''
# For financial queries, look for lines with numbers
financial_lines = [
line.strip() for line in raw_content.split('\n')
if any(kw in line.lower() for kw in
['revenue', 'eps', 'earnings', 'margin', 'guidance', 'billion'])
and any(c.isdigit() for c in line)
and len(line.strip()) > 30
]
if financial_lines:
print(f'## {r["title"]}')
print(f'URL: {r["url"]}')
for line in financial_lines[:15]:
print(f' {line}')
print()
PYEOF
Turn 1 — broad search + triage:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
# Search from multiple angles
queries = [
('broad', 'EU AI Act implementation timeline 2025'),
('specific', 'EU AI Act high-risk AI systems obligations'),
]
all_results = []
for label, query in queries:
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'search', query, '--max-results', '8', '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL
)
data = json.loads(raw)
for r in data['results']:
r['_query'] = label
all_results.extend(data['results'])
# Deduplicate by URL
seen = set()
unique = []
for r in all_results:
if r['url'] not in seen:
seen.add(r['url'])
unique.append(r)
# Save all results
with open('/tmp/eu_ai_results.json', 'w') as f:
json.dump(unique, f)
# Print triage
unique.sort(key=lambda r: r['score'], reverse=True)
print(f'{len(unique)} unique results from {len(queries)} queries\n')
for i, r in enumerate(unique[:10]):
print(f'[{i}] [{r["score"]:.2f}] ({r["_query"]}) {r["title"][:80]}')
print(f' {r["url"]}')
print(f' {r["content"][:120]}')
print()
PYEOF
Turn 2 — you see the triage, pick the best sources, and extract:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
results = json.load(open('/tmp/eu_ai_results.json'))
# Fetch full content for the top 3 (you chose these based on turn 1)
for r in [results[0], results[2], results[4]]:
try:
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'extract', r['url'], '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL, timeout=30
)
page = json.loads(raw)
if not page.get('results'):
continue
content = page['results'][0].get('raw_content', '')
# Your filtering logic — tailored to this query
print(f'## {r["title"]}')
print(f'URL: {r["url"]}\n')
for para in content.split('\n\n'):
para = para.strip()
if len(para) > 100 and any(kw in para.lower() for kw in
['high-risk', 'prohibited', 'deadline', 'obligation',
'compliance', 'penalty', 'fine', 'article']):
print(para)
print()
print('---\n')
except Exception:
continue
PYEOF
Sometimes turn 2 reveals new URLs or topics to chase. You can keep iterating:
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json, subprocess
# Read the page you saved earlier
with open('/tmp/page_detail.txt') as f:
content = f.read()
# You noticed a reference to a specific regulation document
# Search for it specifically
raw = subprocess.check_output(
['tvly', 'search', 'EU AI Act Annex III high-risk list',
'--include-domains', 'eur-lex.europa.eu',
'--max-results', '3', '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL
)
data = json.loads(raw)
for r in data['results']:
print(f'## {r["title"]}')
print(f'URL: {r["url"]}')
print(r['content'])
print()
PYEOF
Each turn, you save data to /tmp/, decide what to explore next, and write new filtering code as heredocs. The raw data accumulates on disk; your context stays lean.
The Python you write IS the filtering logic. There are no fixed templates — you write code that makes sense for the specific query. Here are principles, not rules:
Triage first. Inspect titles and scores before fetching full pages. Don't extract everything blindly.
Be specific. A financial query should filter for numbers and financial terms. A technical query should look for code blocks and specifications. A news query should look for dates and quotes. Match your filtering to the query.
Structural filtering helps. Skip lines shorter than ~50-80 chars (usually nav elements). Skip common boilerplate phrases. Keep headings and their following paragraphs. But these are starting points — adapt based on what you see.
Print structured output. Format your output so it's easy to reason over:
print(f'## {title}')
print(f'URL: {url}')
print(relevant_content)
print()
Handle errors. Pages fail, URLs 404, extractions timeout. Use try/except and skip failures:
try:
raw = subprocess.check_output(['tvly', 'extract', url, '--json'],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL, timeout=30)
except Exception:
continue
Token budget awareness. Your print() output is what enters your context. Target 150-600 tokens per source. If you're printing 5000+ chars from a single page, you're probably not filtering enough. But if a source has a critical data table, it's fine to keep more.
All standard tvly search options work:
| Option | Description |
|---|---|
--max-results | Number of results (default: 5, max: 20) |
--depth | ultra-fast, fast, basic (default), advanced |
--time-range | day, week, month, year |
--include-domains | Comma-separated whitelist |
--exclude-domains | Comma-separated blacklist |
--include-raw-content | Full page content (markdown or text) |
--country | Boost results from country |
When python3 is unavailable, use jq for basic filtering:
tvly search "query" --json 2>/dev/null | jq '[.results[] | select(.score > 0.5) | {title, url, content}]'
jq can't do multi-step search-then-extract or complex filtering. Use it only for simple lookups.
tvly commands that dump raw pages into the agent context.Before claiming dynamic Tavily search succeeded:
This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.
$CODEX_HOME/skills/tavily-dynamic-search and restart Codex after major changes.Preferred MCP Server: Tavily MCP Server
tvly JSON outside the main context, filter it locally with Python or jq, preserve source URLs and qualifiers, and show the bounded output and verification evidence."まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。