「submission」の検索結果

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — ScholarOne portal, anonymization for double-blind review, AOM house-style formatting, files, and ethics declarations. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (amj-rebuttal).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotates bacterial and archaeal genomes (isolates, MAGs, plasmids) with Bakta (active versioned databases, NCBI-compliant output) or Prokka (legacy), producing GFF3/GenBank/EMBL/FASTA with INSDC locus tags. Covers Bakta-vs-Prokka-vs-PGAP-vs-DFAST choice, light-vs-full database tiers, translation-table selection (11/4/25), archaeal and leaderless-gene caveats, the small-ORF blind spot, pseudogene-vs-phase-variation, the pangenome re-annotation trap, and submission compliance. Use when annotating a newly assembled prokaryotic genome, choosing an annotation tool, re-annotating a collection for pangenomics, or preparing annotations for NCBI/DDBJ submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits App Store submission readiness and rejection risk across current review guidelines, PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy and required-reason APIs, privacy labels, ATT, StoreKit payments, metadata, entitlements, widgets, and Live Activities. Use when preparing a submission, responding to rejection, reconciling privacy evidence, or separating upload blockers from cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and localize App Store in-app events, upload event media, and submit or recover event review submissions with asc. Use when managing in-app events, event card or details page assets, or event-specific submission errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate App Store releases with asc, including staging a version, uploading or building an artifact, publishing, and submitting for review. Use when the user wants to prepare or execute a release. Keep Game Center item preparation in this skill; route other readiness failures, stuck submissions, cancellation, and retry decisions to asc-submission-health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write compelling award submissions, grant applications, and competition entries. Maps achievements to selection criteria using evidence-based narratives. Use whenever the user is applying for a business award (Telstra, chamber of commerce, industry awards), a grant, a competition, or any submission demonstrating merit against defined criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan cold start, get first users, or launch a new product with zero traction. Also use when the user mentions "cold start," "cold start problem," "first users," "seed users," "finding users," "finding early users," "Fiverr Upwork," "comment outreach," "Twitter search users," "product launch strategy," "0 to 1 growth," "early-stage acquisition," "launch channels," "get first customers," "Product Hunt launch," "AppSumo," "LTD," "indie hacker," "bootstrapping," or "solo founder." For directory listing copy and submissions, use directory-submission. For Product Hunt day-of execution, use product-hunt-launch. For GTM motion design, use gtm-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to submit a product or app to directories, curated lists, launch platforms, or app stores—and needs ready-to-paste copy per platform. Reads root contextus.md when present. Also use when the user mentions "directory submission," "get listed," "app store listing," "submit to directories," "curated list," "best tools list," "Taaft," "Product Hunt," "directory ads," "newsletter feature," "directory campaign," "tailor description per platform," "Shopify App Store," "Chrome Web Store," "navigation site," or "product directory." For Product Hunt launch day tactics (hunter, first comment, timing), use product-hunt-launch. For full 0→1 channel planning, use cold-start-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An "if I were the judge" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. This skill covers both prose craft (clarity, examples, parallel construction, voice, quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings). Use this skill whenever the user asks you to draft, edit, or improve legal writing and wants it to be genuinely persuasive — not just correct. Also trigger when the user mentions 'make it more persuasive', 'sharpen this', 'strengthen the argument', 'rewrite this section', 'punch it up', 'legal writing', 'draft a brief', 'draft a submission', 'write like a top advocate', or asks you to improve the rhetoric, flow, or force of any legal document. This skill complements the larissa-legal-voice skill (which handles tone and personal voice) by adding the persuasive technique layer on top.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on "edit my article," "review this draft," "critique my note," "check my Bluebook citations," "is my argument sound," "read my law review piece," "workshop this paper," "pre-submission review." Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates App Store release documentation including submission guide, assets, privacy compliance, and marketing strategy. Creates RELEASE_SPEC.md for app launch. Use when preparing for App Store submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle App Store rejections, prepare submissions to avoid common rejection reasons, write Resolution Center responses, and navigate the appeal process. Use when user's app was rejected, is preparing for submission, or needs help with App Review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper from my experiments", "turn this idea and these results into a paper", "generate a conference submission", "run paper-orchestra on X", or otherwise wants the end-to-end paper-writing pipeline. Coordinates the outline-agent, plotting-agent, literature-review-agent, section-writing-agent, and content-refinement-agent skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance checking, or App Store submission readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user is ready to submit their tax return, needs a final review checklist, wants to know how to submit (e-Tax, mail, or in-person), or asks about common mistakes before submission. Trigger phrases include: "提出準備", "提出方法", "e-Taxで提出", "チェックリスト", "申告書の確認", "提出前の確認", "郵送で提出", "税務署に持っていく", "提出期限".

Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned earned-media discipline. Use when building a media list, validating a story angle, drafting a journalist pitch, preparing a press kit, evaluating newsjacking, or answering a reporter request. NOT FOR: directory submissions (use suede-directory-submissions), launch packaging (use suede-launch-packaging), social publishing (use suede-social), or contacting anyone without approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。