122 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review commercial contracts, NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, and vendor agreements for obligation clarity, risk allocation, termination, data handling, and negotiation red flags. Use when a user needs a structured contract summary, red flag list, fallback positions, or clause-by-clause review. Do not use as jurisdiction-specific legal advice, litigation strategy, or final legal sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Child, Family, and School Social Worker — distinguishing an immediate child-safety determination from a longer-term risk assessment, deciding whether an in-home safety plan can control an identified danger versus removal being required, building a safety plan with specific and verifiable (not vague) elements, documenting a case contemporaneously and factually for a court-involved record, or engaging a family's specific context and strengths rather than a generic checklist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit corporate tax compliance systems across jurisdictions. Analyzes tax engine configuration (Avalara, Vertex, ONESOURCE), nexus determination and Wayfair economic nexus tracking, sales/use tax calculation accuracy, federal and state income tax compliance (book-to-tax adjustments, NOL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze game design documents and implementations for core gameplay loop clarity and depth, XP leveling curves and unlock pacing, difficulty curve spikes and plateaus, skill tree viability, player motivation via Self-Determination Theory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze government benefits processing software for eligibility determination, application workflow efficiency, document verification, error rates, appeal tracking, multi-program coordination, and ADA/Section 508 compliance..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses, predicts, and mitigates node disruptions during Compute Engine host maintenance and hardware or software maintenance events for GPU and TPU workloads on GKE. Use when diagnosing node disruptions, predicting host maintenance events on GPU/TPU nodepools, inspecting node interruption PromQL metrics, auditing node taints, or configuring workload protection strategies (graceful termination, opportunistic maintenance, PodDisruptionBudgets). Don't use for general GKE cluster creation, network policy configuration, or non-disruption workload deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when gathering, structuring, and documenting requirements for a Financial Services Cloud (FSC) wealth management implementation — including financial planning workflow discovery, portfolio review process mapping, client lifecycle requirements, advisor tooling needs, and FSC architecture determination (managed package vs. FSC Core). Trigger keywords: wealth management requirements, FSC requirements gathering, financial planning workflow, portfolio review process, advisor tools setup, FSC data model scoping, wealth management process mapping. NOT for implementation, configuration, or code — use financial-account-setup, fsc-action-plans, or apex/fsc-financial-calculations for those. NOT for FSC architecture decisions — use architect/wealth-management-architecture. NOT for Health Cloud or NPSP requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when admins are governing the Chatter group lifecycle — creation policy, public/private/unlisted visibility decisions, group ownership transfer when owners leave, archived vs inactive vs deleted state changes, auto-archive behavior, naming conventions, group templates (Information Templates), and orphan-group cleanup after user terminations. Triggers: 'we have 800 dead chatter groups', 'group owner left the company who owns it now', 'should this group be public private or unlisted', 'when does a chatter group auto-archive', 'how do I delete vs archive a chatter group', 'we need a chatter group naming convention'. NOT for Chatter notification / digest / feed-noise tuning (use admin/chatter-notification-tuning), NOT for Chatter REST API integration patterns (use apex/apex-connect-api-chatter), NOT for Custom Notifications API (use apex/apex-custom-notifications-from-apex), NOT for Experience Cloud / Customer Community group access (different sharing model).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when configuring or troubleshooting Salesforce CPQ contract creation, subscription management, amendment quotes, or renewal quotes. Trigger keywords: contract, amendment, renewal, subscription, co-termination, SBQQ__Subscription__c. NOT for designing the amendment/renewal architecture or swap pattern — use architect/subscription-management-architecture. NOT for amending or renewing contracts from Apex — use apex/cpq-api-and-automation. Also covers the standard Contract and Order objects underneath CPQ — Contract Status vs StatusCode, activation locking, EndDate auto-calculation, ContractSettings and OrderSettings, reduction orders, and renewal-reminder automation. Trigger keywords: Contract, ContractStatus, StatusCode, ActivatedDate, OwnerExpirationNotice, ContractTerm, EndDate, Order, OrderItem, reduction order, ContractSettings, OrderSettings, renewal reminder. NOT for Revenue Cloud or Subscription Management objects — use architect/revenue-cloud-architecture and architect/subscription-management-architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GEODE CHANGELOG.md management rules. Version releases, change logging, scope determination, format standards. Triggers on "changelog", "release", "version", "릴리스", "변경사항", "버전".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization under 11 U.S.C. §§ 1121–1129 with claim classification, treatment provisions, distribution mechanics, executory contract determinations, and confirmation compliance. Use when preparing reorganization plans, restructuring debts, classifying claims, drafting Chapter 11 plans, or helping debtors emerge from bankruptcy. Trigger keywords: reorganization plan, Chapter 11, plan of reorganization, debt restructuring, cramdown, claim classification, confirmation order.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts U.S. Customs and Border Protection binding ruling requests under 19 CFR Part 177 for tariff classification, valuation, origin, and marking determinations. Trigger when input mentions "binding ruling," "CBP ruling request," "19 CFR Part 177," "classification request," "HTSUS analysis," "transaction value," "country of origin," or "marking for import."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends postpartum endocrine care (diabetes management) in addition to usual obstetric care for individuals with preexisting diabetes (including those with pregnancy loss or termination). Triggered by postpartum care planning for patients with diabetes after delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level spectroscopy knowledge. Use when working with NMR, IR, Raman, UV-Vis, mass spectrometry, fluorescence, X-ray, electron spectroscopy, or any spectroscopic technique for structure determination or chemical analysis. Also use when the user mentions 'NMR spectroscopy', 'chemical shift', 'coupling constant', 'IR absorption', 'Raman scattering', 'UV-Vis absorption', 'fluorescence', 'XPS', 'EPR', 'mass spectrum', 'fragmentation', or 'spectral interpretation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level developmental biology covering embryogenesis, cell fate determination, morphogen gradients, organogenesis, stem cells, and regenerative medicine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads one export transaction, order or shipment description and returns a DRAFT export review pack: parties to screen with a screening checklist, an item classification worksheet, a red-flag review, licence-determination questions and open items. Use when the user asks to "prepare the export review for this order", "pre-check this shipment for export control", "who do we need to screen on this deal", "build the classification worksheet for this item" or "assemble the trade-compliance file for this technology transfer". Do not use for vendor security or due-diligence screening of a supplier's questionnaire answers; use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead. Never classifies, screens, clears, decides licence need or releases a shipment; trade compliance does. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a DRAFT data incident impact brief from the incident notes and data inventory the user provides: the timeline as stated, systems involved matched to the inventory, data categories held and evidenced as involved, people and record counts potentially affected with the source and method behind every figure, third parties, notification questions for legal and the data protection officer, and every UNKNOWN with the evidence that would settle it. No legal determination: it never states whether the incident is a reportable breach, whether notice is due, to whom or by when. Use when the user asks to "prepare the impact brief for this incident", "what data was involved", "how many people are affected", "map the incident to our data inventory" or "pull together what legal needs on the incident". Do not use for the blameless postmortem or root-cause timeline, use incident-postmortem-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Ambassador — ambassador (Emissary-Ingress) API gateway management covering mappings, hosts, TLS contexts, authentication filters, rate limiting, and Envoy proxy configuration. Use when managing Ambassador/Emissary-Ingress routing, configuring API gateway mappings, debugging routing issues, setting up TLS termination, or analyzing gateway performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides migration of .NET Framework Thread.Abort usage to cooperative cancellation in modern .NET. USE FOR: modernizing code that calls Thread.Abort, catching ThreadAbortException, replacing Thread.ResetAbort, replacing Thread.Interrupt for thread termination, resolving PlatformNotSupportedException or SYSLIB0006 after retargeting to .NET 6+, migrating ASP.NET Response.End or Response.Redirect(url, true) which internally call Thread.Abort. DO NOT USE FOR: code that only uses Thread.Join, Thread.Sleep, or Thread.Start without any abort, interrupt, or ThreadAbortException usage — these APIs work identically in modern .NET and need no migration. Also not for projects staying on .NET Framework, or Thread.Abort usage inside third-party libraries you do not control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements security controls at the API gateway layer including authentication enforcement, rate limiting, request validation, IP allowlisting, TLS termination, and threat protection. The engineer configures API gateways (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Azure APIM, Apigee) to act as a centralized security enforcement point that validates, throttles, and monitors all API traffic before it reaches backend services. Activates for requests involving API gateway security, API management security, gateway a...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about driver fitness-for-duty programs — pre-trip readiness assessment, recognizing impairment from drugs/alcohol/medication/fatigue/mental health, refusing assignments when unfit, supervisor training on fitness assessment, FMCSA recommendations on duty status determination, and how to handle a driver who appears unfit. Reference 49 CFR 392.3 + 392.4.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks how to investigate a CMV accident — what to do at the scene, the first 24 hours, evidence preservation, who to call, preventability determination, ELD data preservation, dash cam review, witness interviews, working with insurance + attorney, and how to build a learning culture from incidents. Reference 49 CFR 392.7 + insurance industry best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。