「what」の検索結果

Post-meeting debrief — analyzes what happened, compares outcomes to your prep intentions, tracks decision evolution. Use when the user says "debrief", "what just happened in that meeting", "what did we decide", "debrief that call", "post-meeting", "what changed", or right after stopping a recording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a session's context window like the budget it is — what loads up front, what gets linked instead, what stays fetch-on-demand, and how to keep the stable prefix cache-friendly so repeated turns cost cents instead of dollars. Use when asked my agent keeps blowing its context, plan what to load into the session, why is every turn so expensive, or design the context for this workflow. Produces the load/link/fetch allocation, the cache-aware prefix layout, the per-turn cost shape, and the eviction rules for when the window fills anyway.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a contract you're about to sign in plain language — surface the clauses that could bite you, what they mean, and what to question or renegotiate. Use when asked to check this contract before I sign, what am I agreeing to, are there red flags in this agreement, or explain this contract's risky bits. Produces a plain-English flag list of the risky/unusual clauses (auto-renewal, lock-in, liability, IP, termination, fees), what each means for you, questions to ask, and suggested changes — flagging when it's important enough for a lawyer. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface the hidden assumptions a plan or belief rests on, then test what happens when each one is wrong. Use when asked what am I assuming here, check my assumptions, what if I'm wrong about, or stress-test my thinking. Produces the unstated assumptions your conclusion depends on (ranked by how load-bearing they are), a flip of each to see which one breaking would change everything, and the cheapest way to check the riskiest ones — because the assumption you didn't know you were making is what sinks plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think clearly about whether bankruptcy is the right move, or whether another path fits better — without shame and without a sales pitch. Use when asked should I file for bankruptcy, is bankruptcy my best option, alternatives to bankruptcy, or what happens if I file. Produces an honest read on whether your situation is the kind bankruptcy actually helps, the main types and what each does (and doesn't) discharge, the real trade-offs (what you keep, the credit impact and its recovery, what's not dischargeable), the alternatives to weigh first (negotiation, debt management, doing nothing on time-barred debt), and a strong push to consult a bankruptcy attorney. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision already failed and works backwards to find out why, in a fresh agent that had no hand in making it. Sweeps nine areas and shows what each produced, including the empty ones. Ends on one verdict: go ahead, go but fix these first, try it small first, think again, do not do this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a week or a month of YouTube uploads - what to post, when, and in what order, sized to the creator's actual capacity. Use for "plan my week", "content calendar", "what should I post", "I have no idea what to make next".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly business retrospective. Reads all snapshots, learnings, skill-usage telemetry, and (if provided) revenue data from the past week. Outputs: what got decided, what shipped, what's stalled, skill activity, suggested next focus. Surfaces unused skills as activation prompts. Use at end of week or end of sprint. Triggered by: 'weekly retro', 'business retro', 'what did we ship', 'how's the week going', '周复盘', '业务回顾', '本周复盘'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a question from a second-brain vault by reading its own pages, citing the pages used, and saying plainly when the vault does not contain the answer. Use this skill whenever the user asks what they know about a topic, what they have read on something, what connects two ideas, what they have changed their mind about, or asks any question that should be answered from their own notes rather than general knowledge. Do NOT use for ingesting new material, for general questions the vault has nothing to do with, or when the user explicitly wants an answer from the open web.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage an exported chat history into what to ingest, what to archive and what to delete, with a privacy pass first. Use this skill when the user has exported their Claude or ChatGPT history, asks to import old conversations, or asks what in their chat archive is worth keeping. Do NOT use for ingesting a single pasted conversation, or for any material the user has not explicitly asked to bring into the vault.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a multi-quarter roadmap from a backlog of ideas, requests, and ongoing initiatives. Use this skill when planning the next quarter, sequencing dependent work, balancing build vs improve vs maintain, or making the case for what NOT to do. Triggers on roadmap, quarterly planning, what should we build next, sequencing, prioritization, OKR planning, capacity planning, what's on the roadmap, plan the year, what to ship next quarter. Also triggers when stakeholders are pulling in different directions and the team needs a defensible plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze any OFAC or OFSI enforcement action — by URL, pasted text, or uploaded document — and produce a structured root cause analysis as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheet. Use this skill whenever a user names, links to, pastes, or uploads an OFAC or OFSI enforcement action and asks for any of the following: root cause analysis, compliance gaps, what went wrong, lessons learned, organizational self-assessment, or remediation planning. Also trigger when a user asks "analyze this enforcement action", "what were the root causes", "turn this into a checklist", or "how do I make sure this doesn't happen to us". Outputs a single-sheet .xlsx table with six columns: Root Cause | What Went Wrong | How It Went Wrong | What Could Have Stopped It | Is my organization immune to this? (Yes/No/Partial) | Notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to manage projects across your businesses using a kanban + Eisenhower methodology. One kanban per business (whatever portfolio of businesses, projects, or initiatives you run). Tool-agnostic — connects via API/MCP to whatever PM tool each business uses (Notion, GitHub Projects, Plane, Linear, Obsidian file-based, or manual mode). Async-first output. Six modes — setup (scaffold a new board for a business), triage (Eisenhower-sort the backlog), next (pick the next thing to work on, single board or across all), status (paste-ready async snapshot), unblock (diagnose Review/Blocked column), weekly (Friday pulse + week planning). Triggers on "/pm," "/pm setup," "/pm triage," "/pm next," "/pm status," "/pm unblock," "/pm weekly," "what should I work on next," "kanban status," "Eisenhower this," "triage my backlog," "what's blocked."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank content angles by engagement data, competition level, and platform fit. Data-driven angle selection instead of guesswork. Use this skill when the user has a keyword or product and needs to decide WHAT to create, which angle to take, which format to use, or which platform to target. Triggers on: "what angle should I use", "rank content ideas for [keyword]", "best angle for [product]", "which content idea will perform best", "help me pick an angle", "what should I write about", "content angle for [topic]", "rank my content ideas", "which approach will get the most views", "data-driven content planning", "angle ranker", "content scoring", "which hook should I use", "compare these content ideas", "prioritize my content angles", "what video should I make".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List the available harness templates and what each one ships with. Use when the user asks "what templates are available", "what verticals does the harness generator support", or "show me what I can scaffold".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps every competitor and the gap they leave. Finds the direct competitors, indirect ones and the substitutes a buyer would use instead, from public sources only, and records what each sells, at what price, how they position themselves and what their customers complain about in public reviews, every fact with a link. Ends with a positioning map and the gap the new business can own. Use when the user says "who are my competitors", "is this market crowded", "what else is out there", "competitor analysis", "find the gap", or "who am I up against".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a short handoff note for the next chat or a teammate, with what is done, what is open, what comes next and what was rejected and why. Saves it to project memory so the next chat sees it at the start, and prints it so it can be pasted into a message or a pull request. Use when the user ends a piece of work, switches tasks, or hands the project to someone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load project-specific context -- tech stack, architecture overview, directory layout, trusted sources, and conventions -- so that all skills operate with awareness of what this project actually is. Use when a knowledge base document exists, or when the user asks about the project's tech stack, architecture, conventions, framework, directory layout, or says 'tell me about this project', 'what are we using?', 'what's our stack?', or 'what framework is this?'. Use the knowledge-priming-refiner to create a knowledge base document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class brand positioning expertise combining David Ogilvy's direct response wisdom, Emily Heyward's obsessive brand strategy (Red Antler), and Al Ries/Jack Trout's positioning classics. This skill answers: "What space do we own in the customer's mind, and why does it matter?" Brand isn't what you say about yourself - it's what others say when you're not in the room. Positioning isn't about creativity - it's about claiming territory in an overcrowded mind. Use when "brand positioning, positioning statement, brand strategy, category design, competitive positioning, how should we position, brand differentiation, value proposition, what makes us different, brand platform, brand values, brand personality, brand promise, brand manifesto, tagline, unique selling proposition, usp, category creation, own a word, mind share, brand, positioning, strategy, differentiation, category, competitive, values, identity" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

管理咨询 (管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的价值之辩 (「借你的表告诉你时间」「frameworks 是剧场表演 vs 真洞见」Matthew Stewart《The Management Myth》)、McKinsey 的丑闻 (Purdue 阿片类/独裁政府/ICE/利益冲突, Bogdanich & Forsythe《When McKinsey Comes to Town》)、咨询 vs 自建战略部、generalist 通才 vs specialist 专才之争、AI/GenAI 对初级分析师工作的冲击; (h) 流派 — 战略经典 (Porter 定位学派/五力 vs 资源基础观 RBV vs 蓝海战略 Kim&Mauborgne vs 颠覆式创新 Christensen vs Mintzberg 应急战略批判 planning school); 三巨头气质分野 (McKinsey 事实驱动/CEO 信任/通才, BCG 概念/思想领导力/经验曲线/增长-份额矩阵, Bain 结果导向/NPS 净推荐值/PE 关系/与客户深度绑定)。不含: 投行 M&A/财务顾问 (估值/承销超出范畴)、纯 IT 实施/系统集成 (SI 人力外包)、纯审计/税务、纯人力 RPO/猎头、内部战略部 only (虽相关但本 skill 聚焦专业服务咨询的外部视角)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research what people are actually saying about a topic in the last 30 days across Reddit, X / Twitter, YouTube, Hacker News, dev.to, Medium, and other public discourse platforms. API-free; uses WebSearch with platform-targeted site operators plus recency filters. Produces DISCOURSE.md (a structured brief) and JSON output the writer can consume. Complements blog-researcher (which focuses on authority sources) with a recency-and-engagement lens. Use when user says "blog discourse", "discourse research", "what are people saying about", "research what people are saying", "voice of customer", "social listening", "30-day research", "trend research", "what's the discussion on", "real-time research", "practitioner discourse", "/blog discourse".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。