「ats」の検索結果

Automatically analyzes configuration files to detect inconsistencies, conflicts, missing keys, and divergent values across environments, versions, or modules. Use when managing multi-environment configurations, detecting config drift, validating configuration changes, or ensuring consistency across microservices. Supports JSON, YAML, TOML, INI, XML, .env, and properties files. Identifies security issues like hardcoded secrets and provides actionable resolution guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate configuration files for applications, services, and infrastructure. Use when: (1) Setting up new projects (package.json, requirements.txt, tsconfig.json), (2) Creating Docker or Kubernetes configurations, (3) Configuring CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI), (4) Setting up web servers (Nginx, Apache), (5) Defining infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation), (6) Generating linter/formatter configs (ESLint, Prettier, Black). Provides templates and custom-generated configs for diverse tech stacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instrument code to support efficient git bisect by producing deterministic pass/fail signals and concise runtime summaries for each tested commit. Use when debugging regressions with git bisect, automating bisect workflows, creating bisect test scripts, handling flaky tests during bisection, or needing clear exit codes and logging for automated bisect runs. Helps identify the exact commit that introduced a bug through automated testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and analyzes conflicts in software requirements including logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, and stakeholder priority mismatches. Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts that could block implementation or cause rework. Provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Dockerfiles, Docker Compose configurations, and Kubernetes manifests for containerizing applications. Use when: (1) Creating Dockerfiles for Node.js, Python, Java, Go, or other applications, (2) Setting up multi-service environments with Docker Compose, (3) Generating Kubernetes deployments, services, and ingress configurations, (4) Optimizing container images for production, (5) Implementing containerization best practices. Provides both ready-to-use templates and custom-generated configurations based on project requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug proof failures using counterexamples from Nitpick (Isabelle) or QuickChick (Coq) to identify specification errors, missing preconditions, and proof strategy issues. Use when: (1) A proof attempt fails and you need to understand why, (2) Counterexamples are generated by Nitpick or QuickChick, (3) Specifications may be incorrect or incomplete, (4) Theorems need validation before proving, (5) Missing preconditions or lemmas need identification, or (6) Proof failures need explanation and correction suggestions. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarizes the complete lifecycle of a bug across code versions, tracking its introduction, detection, fixing attempts, and regression history. Use when users need to: (1) Understand how a bug evolved over time, (2) Trace when and how a bug was introduced, (3) Analyze fix attempts and their effectiveness, (4) Identify regression patterns, (5) Generate bug lifecycle reports for documentation or post-mortems. Takes a repository, bug identifier, and version history as input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify the precise location of bugs in source code, modules, and systems. Use this skill when debugging applications, investigating test failures, analyzing error reports, tracing runtime issues, or performing root cause analysis. Analyzes stack traces, error messages, failing tests, and code patterns to pinpoint buggy functions, classes, files, or modules with confidence rankings and supporting evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generates executable test cases from model checking counterexample traces. Translates abstract counterexample states and transitions into concrete test inputs, execution steps, and assertions that reproduce property violations. Use when working with model checker outputs (SPIN, CBMC, NuSMV, TLA+, Java PathFinder, etc.) and needing to create regression tests, validate bug fixes, or reproduce verification failures in executable test suites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze existing test suites and source code to suggest additional unit tests that improve test coverage. Use this skill when working with test files and source code to identify untested code paths, missing edge cases, uncovered branches, untested error conditions, and gaps in test coverage. Supports major testing frameworks (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go testing, etc.) and generates targeted test suggestions based on coverage analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive code reviews identifying bugs, security issues, performance problems, code quality concerns, and best practice violations. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, evaluating new code, assessing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations. Analyzes code for correctness, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, maintainability issues, test coverage, documentation quality, and adherence to coding standards. Produces structured markdown reviews with categorized findings, severity ratings, specific examples, and actionable recommendations. Triggers when users ask to review code, check pull requests, evaluate implementations, find bugs, or assess code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate C/C++ programs to equivalent Dafny code while preserving semantics and ensuring verification. Use when users ask to convert, translate, or port C/C++ code to Dafny, or when they need to formally verify C/C++ algorithms using Dafny's verification capabilities. Handles functions, structs, pointers, arrays, memory management, and ensures the generated Dafny code is well-typed, executable, verifiable, and can successfully run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair buggy code and generate comprehensive tests for Python, Java, and C++ programs. Use when users need to fix logic errors or runtime errors in functions, modules, or repositories. Accepts specifications via natural language descriptions, existing test cases, or input/output examples. Generates corrected code, creates or updates tests to verify correctness and prevent regressions, and produces a detailed report explaining the bug, fix, and testing strategy. Triggers on requests like "fix this bug", "repair this code", "debug this function", or "this code is broken".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggest and apply code refactorings to improve readability, maintainability, and code quality. Use this skill when improving existing code structure, eliminating code smells, applying design patterns, simplifying complex logic, extracting duplicated code, renaming for clarity, or preparing code for new features. Provides specific before/after examples, explains benefits, identifies risks, and ensures behavior preservation through tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code to identify security-critical time intervals and timing vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, and time-sensitive security operations. Use this skill when reviewing code for proper timeout enforcement, token expiration, session management, rate limiting, password reset validity, or any time-sensitive security mechanism. Detects missing expiration checks, excessive timeout values, lack of rate limiting, client-side only validation, hardcoded timeouts, and timing attack vulnerabilities. Triggers when users ask to check security timeouts, verify token expiration handling, audit session timeout implementation, review rate limiting, or analyze time-based security controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze codebases to identify reusable code patterns, duplications, and implementation patterns for future development. Use when refactoring code, identifying technical debt, finding opportunities for abstraction, or documenting common patterns in a directory or module. Outputs pattern catalogs, refactoring suggestions, and reusable template code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze CVE reachability in software repositories by examining how vulnerable dependencies are imported and used. Determines whether vulnerable components, classes, or functions are reachable from project code through call chain analysis, reflection detection, dynamic loading patterns, and configuration-gated behavior. Classifies each CVE as likely reachable, possibly reachable, or likely unreachable with supporting evidence. Use when analyzing security vulnerabilities in dependencies, performing post-disclosure CVE triage, assessing vulnerability impact, or when users ask to analyze CVE reachability, check if vulnerabilities are exploitable, or evaluate dependency security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generates executable tests that reproduce reported bugs from issue reports and code repositories. Use when users need to: (1) Create a test that reproduces a bug described in an issue report, (2) Generate failing tests from bug descriptions, stack traces, or error messages, (3) Validate bug reports by creating reproducible test cases, (4) Convert issue reports into executable regression tests. Takes a repository and issue report as input and produces test code that reliably triggers the reported bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate code fixes and patches from bug reports, failing test cases, error messages, and stack traces. Use this skill when debugging code, fixing test failures, addressing GitHub issues, resolving runtime errors, or patching security vulnerabilities. Analyzes the bug context, identifies root causes, and generates precise code patches with explanations and validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically migrates build systems and CI/CD configurations to target platforms. Use when modernizing build infrastructure, switching CI/CD providers, or standardizing across projects. Supports common migration paths including Maven↔Gradle, npm↔Yarn, Travis CI→GitHub Actions, CircleCI→GitHub Actions, Jenkins→GitLab CI, and GitLab CI→GitHub Actions. Analyzes existing configuration, generates equivalent target configuration, maps dependencies and commands, and provides validation and migration documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes ambiguous language in software requirements and user stories. Use when reviewing requirements documents, user stories, specifications, or any software requirement text to identify vague quantifiers, unclear scope, undefined terms, missing edge cases, subjective language, and incomplete specifications. Provides detailed analysis with clarifying questions and suggested improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。