1,542 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of a board-certified Clinical Neuropsychologist — building a neuropsychological battery to localize a brain-behavior deficit, adjudicating performance validity before interpreting any cognitive score, distinguishing a dementia subtype or mTBI sequela from a psychiatric or malingering cause, or writing a forensic, pre-surgical (epilepsy/tumor), or serial-retest report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Art, Drama, or Music Professor — diagnosing a jury/crit score that contradicts a semester of formative work, building a studio-art or performance tenure dossier around exhibitions and productions instead of publications, staffing applied one-on-one lessons or crit sections between adjuncts and full-time faculty, running a structured critique, or deciding whether a failed barrier jury means a change of major.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biofuels/Biodiesel Technology and Product Development Manager — deciding whether a lab/bench-scale process is ready to scale up, evaluating feedstock flexibility tradeoffs in process design, pricing a technology's value against regulatory credit pathways (RFS RIN, LCFS CI score), or managing IP strategy for a novel conversion process. Distinct from biofuels-production-manager, which runs an existing operating facility — this role owns R&D and commercialization of new or improved process technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Animal Caretaker — triaging daily husbandry when kennel census exceeds staffing capacity, reading a Fear-Anxiety-Stress (FAS) score change or appetite/output drop against an escalation threshold, deciding brush-out vs. shave-down on a matted coat, or setting isolation and vaccination-lead-time protocol for a new intake or boarding admission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adult ESL/Basic Education Instructor — placing a new adult learner using standardized assessment scores, designing life-context-relevant lesson content for working adults, tracking NRS-reportable level gains, addressing attendance/retention barriers, or preparing a learner for GED/HSE or workplace English benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Acute Care Nurse — tracking early warning score trends across a higher patient ratio than ICU to catch silent deterioration before crisis, distinguishing expected post-operative recovery variation from a true complication requiring escalation, triaging competing needs across multiple simultaneous patients, balancing analgesia against oversedation risk by real-time response rather than fixed dosing, and verifying genuine discharge readiness rather than checking a form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Application Security Engineer — checking whether an endpoint verifies object-level authorization (not just authentication), running threat modeling at design time rather than deferring security review to the end, triaging a dependency vulnerability by actual reachability rather than CVSS score alone, combining SAST/DAST/SCA tooling to cover their distinct blind spots, or applying context-specific output encoding to untrusted input. Distinct from an information security analyst — this role works inside the SDLC to prevent vulnerabilities before they ship, not detect and respond to intrusions in production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) for population allele frequencies, gene constraint scores, and variant annotations to interpret ENCODE regulatory variants. Use when the user needs allele frequencies for variants in ENCODE regulatory elements, wants to assess gene constraint (pLI, LOEUF) for ENCODE target genes, needs population-specific frequencies for GWAS variants overlapping cCREs, wants to filter variants by rarity before functional annotation, or is interpreting ENCODE CRISPR/MPRA results in the context of population genetics. Also use when the user mentions gnomAD, allele frequency, pLI, LOEUF, constraint, rare variants, population frequency, ExAC, or variant filtering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get Ahrefs domain overview: Domain Rating, total backlinks, referring domains, organic keywords, estimated monthly traffic, and traffic value. Use when user says "Ahrefs overview", "domain rating", "DR score", "check backlinks", "how strong is this domain", "domain authority", or "check domain in Ahrefs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standalone E-E-A-T scoring rubric for a URL or content draft. Scores Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust 0-5 each using concrete detectable signals, framed per Google's creating-helpful-content doc. Use when user says "E-E-A-T", "EEAT", "experience expertise", "trust signals", or "author authority".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dedicated Core Web Vitals deep-dive: pull field data (CrUX / PageSpeed Insights), fall back to Lighthouse lab data, score LCP, INP, and CLS against Google's thresholds at the 75th percentile, and run per-metric diagnosis playbooks with concrete fixes. Use when user says "core web vitals", "CWV", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page speed metrics", or "field data".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze SERP for a keyword using Ahrefs live data: ranking pages, DR scores, traffic estimates, and content angle analysis. Use when user says "SERP analysis", "who ranks for", "SERP breakdown", "competitors ranking for keyword", "serp overview", "what's ranking for", "show me the SERP for", or "SERP competition for".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect AI-generated content using pure text analysis (no external API calls). Analyzes sentence uniformity, vocabulary diversity, repetition patterns, hedging language, paragraph uniformity, and personal experience signals. Returns a 0-100 confidence score plus flagged passages. Use when user says "AI content check", "AI detection", "AI written", "content authenticity", "AI content", "detect AI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to up to 7 specialists, generates health score. Enhanced with live Ahrefs (DR, backlinks, traffic) and GSC (indexing, top pages) data when MCPs are available. Use when user says "audit", "full SEO check", "analyze my site", or "website health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a codebase against well-known software design principles: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, KISS, Law of Demeter, Separation of Concerns, Composition over Inheritance, and the code-relevant 12-Factor subset. Scores findings by impact and effort, runs adversarial debate on contested violations, and generates a prioritized DESIGN_AUDIT.md. Use when reviewing code quality beyond what linters catch, assessing design health before a refactor, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase. Can be invoked standalone or delegated from tech-debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive security audit covering OWASP Top 10, secrets detection, supply chain security, threat modeling, and language-specific vulnerability patterns. Investigates actual code paths rather than grep-matching keywords. Generates a scored SECURITY_AUDIT.md with prioritized remediation. Use when assessing application security, preparing for a security review, or onboarding to a codebase with security concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic technical debt analysis across architecture, testing, documentation, and infrastructure. Investigates the codebase, scores findings by impact and effort, and generates a prioritized TECH_DEBT.md remediation plan. Delegates to specialized skills for code quality (scout) and linting (lint-fix). Use when assessing overall project health, planning cleanup sprints, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit deployment readiness across CI/CD, containers, monitoring, IaC, secrets, CDN, and DNS — score each area 0-100, identify critical gaps, and optionally auto-fix by chaining deploy sub-skills
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze vendor management systems for performance scorecards, third-party risk assessment, SLA enforcement, vendor rationalization, and relationship governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare for fundraising due diligence — runs CTO, CFO, CPO, sales, and codebase health reviews to produce a consolidated investor brief with scorecard, red flags, and strengths. Use before Series A, seed round, acqui-hire evaluation, or board presentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit research data management infrastructure -- score FAIR principles compliance (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) across all sub-principles, evaluate data governance frameworks and lifecycle management, assess metadata schema quality (Dublin Core, DataCite, DDI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a complete structured interview kit for a role — 3-5 role-specific competencies, one behavioral (STAR-format) question per competency, 1-5 scoring rubric with explicit behavioral anchors at each level, per-panel scorecards, interviewer debrief template.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze debt payoff software — avalanche vs snowball strategy engines, interest calculation accuracy, amortization schedules, payment scheduling automation, credit score impact modeling, hardship accommodation workflows, and progress visualization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit ML experiment tracking infrastructure for reproducibility gaps, parameter logging completeness, metric capture, artifact management, and pipeline orchestration. Covers MLflow, Weights and Biases, DVC, Sacred, Neptune, Hydra configs, model registries, and produces a reproducibility scorecard (0-30) with actionable fixes for data science teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。