「termin」の検索結果

Implement safety guardrails for AI systems — content filtering, prompt injection detection, output validation, bias mitigation, and responsible AI practices. Use when tasks involve adding safety layers to LLM applications, detecting prompt injection attacks, filtering harmful content, implementing rate limiting for AI APIs, validating LLM outputs against schemas, building moderation pipelines, or ensuring AI systems comply with safety policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build algorithmic trading systems — backtesting, strategy development, live execution, and risk management. Use when tasks involve backtesting trading strategies, connecting to exchange APIs (Binance, Alpaca, Interactive Brokers), implementing technical indicators, portfolio optimization, order execution, risk management rules, market data processing, or building trading bots. Covers both crypto and traditional markets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Apache Arrow, the cross-language columnar memory format for analytics workloads. Helps developers use Arrow for high-performance data interchange between systems, zero-copy reads, and efficient columnar processing in Python (PyArrow) and JavaScript (Arrow JS).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent and LLM evaluations in CI/CD pipelines — automated quality gates that fail the build when AI output quality drops. Use when someone asks to "test my AI agent", "add evals to CI", "catch prompt regressions", "compare models", "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up AI quality gates", or "benchmark my agent before deploying". Covers eval frameworks (Cobalt, Promptfoo, Braintrust), LLM-as-judge scoring, threshold-based assertions, and GitHub Actions integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A/B and multivariate testing methodology. Design experiments, calculate sample sizes, determine statistical significance, avoid common pitfalls, and interpret results. Platform-agnostic framework applicable to landing pages, emails, ads, pricing, and product features. Use when the user asks about A/B testing, split testing, experiment design, statistical significance, or conversion experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When things go wrong - and they will - how you communicate determines whether you lose customers for a day or lose trust forever. Crisis communications isn't about spin or damage control. It's about being human when your company is at its most vulnerable. This skill covers incident response communications, public apologies, data breach notifications, service outages, PR crises, and the aftermath. The goal isn't to look good - it's to be good, and communicate that clearly. Use when "crisis, incident, outage, down, breach, apology, we messed up, customers are angry, PR disaster, viral complaint, status page, postmortem, trust recovery, bad press, crisis, incident, communications, apology, trust, status-page, outage, breach, postmortem, recovery" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in Claude Code hooks - user-defined shell commands that execute at specific points in Claude Code's lifecycle. Provides guaranteed automation that doesn't rely on the LLM "remembering" to do something. Essential for enterprise workflows, code quality enforcement, and deterministic behavior in agentic coding. Use when "claude code hooks, automate claude, block tool use, pre tool use, post tool use, session start hook, claude lifecycle, claude-code, automation, hooks, lifecycle, cli, workflow, devtools" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Builder - Application Building Orchestrator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Main application building orchestrator. Creates full-stack applications from natural language requests. Determines project type, selects tech stack, coordinates agents and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Builder - Application Building Orchestrator workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Main application building orchestrator. Creates full-stack applications from natural language requests. Determines project type, selects tech stack, coordinates agents and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AgentFlow workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

加密链上交易 (加密 / 链上交易 (Crypto & On-chain Trading) — 以加密资产为标的、强调链上活动的主动交易认知操作系统：从「看叙事/选赛道 → 找标的 → 链上尽调与风控 → 选场所(DEX/CEX/链上合约) → 建仓与仓位管理 → 监控链上流向与情绪 → 退出与复盘」的完整决策链。覆盖 (a) 第一性张力 — **链上 on-chain (DEX 现货/AMM、钱包追踪 wallet tracking、资金流向 flow、MEV、memecoin、链上衍生品 Hyperliquid/GMX、自托管 self-custody, 'not your keys not your coins') ⇄ 链下 CEX (中心化交易所现货/合约 Binance/OKX/Bybit、订单簿、托管、出入金法币)**; **合约/杠杆/衍生品 (perps 永续、资金费率 funding、清算 liquidation、爆仓、做多做空、高频/择时) ⇄ 现货/价值/长持 (spot、HODL、定投 DCA、基本面/估值、'time in market > timing the market')**; **价值/基本面派 (协议收入、TVL、代币经济学 tokenomics、真实使用、估值模型) ⇄ meme/叙事/情绪派 (memecoin、narrative rotation 叙事轮动、attention is the asset、纯博弈/PvP、Ponzinomics)**; **链上数据/量化/客观 (on-chain analytics, Nansen/Arkham/Dune、聪明钱 smart money、链上指标、系统化/机械化) ⇄ 直觉/盘感/叙事阅读 (narrative、KOL alpha、社群情绪、tape reading)**; **自托管/去中心化/抗审查 (DeFi、自托管钱包、抗审查、'be your own bank') ⇄ 便利/合规/中心化 (CEX、合规出入金、KYC、托管、ETF)**; **主动交易/择时/高换手 (trading、波段、合约、撸毛/空投 airdrop farming、套利 arbitrage) ⇄ 被动配置/低换手 (配置 BTC/ETH、ETF、长期叙事 beta)**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量 + CLI 化) — 通用链: 叙事/赛道判断 (宏观周期/减半/流动性/板块轮动) → 标的发现 (链上扫链/聪明钱跟单/新币/叙事映射) → 尽调 due diligence (代币经济学/解锁 unlock/团队/合约审计/honeypot 检测/流动性与持仓分布) → 风控前置 (仓位 sizing/最大回撤/止损/相关性) → 场所与执行 (CEX vs DEX、滑点/MEV/gas、限价 vs 市价、TWAP) → 持仓监控 (链上流向/巨鲸/资金费率/解锁日历/情绪指标) → 退出与复盘 (止盈分批/再平衡/记录交易日志); 子流派 SOP: 链上 degen 打新与 memecoin 流程、合约交易者的资金费率与清算地图、空投/撸毛 farming、套利与 MEV、被动配置与定投; (c) 工具栈 — 链上分析 (Nansen 聪明钱/Arkham 实体标注/Dune 自建仪表盘/Dexscreener & DEX Screener 新币/GMGN & Photon & BullX memecoin 终端/Etherscan & Solscan 区块浏览器/DeBank 钱包总览/Token Terminal 协议基本面/DefiLlama TVL/Glassnode & CryptoQuant 链上指标)、交易场所 (CEX: Binance/OKX/Bybit/Coinbase; 链上现货 DEX: Uniswap/Jupiter/Raydium/Aerodrome; 链上衍生品: Hyperliquid/GMX/dYdX)、钱包与安全 (MetaMask/Rabby/Phantom 热钱包、Ledger/Trezor 硬件冷钱包、Revoke.cash 授权管理、honeypot/合约扫描)、行情与图表 (TradingView、CoinGecko/CoinMarketCap)、信息与聚合 (Twitter/X、Telegram、DeFiLlama、RootData/ICO 日历、解锁日历 Token Unlocks)、自动化 (交易机器人、链上 bot/sniper、Telegram trading bot); (d) 知识正典 — 注意加密交易 canon 偏少且新: 通用交易/风控经典 (Edwin Lefèvre 'Reminiscences of a Stock Operator'、Van Tharp 'Trade Your Way to Financial Freedom' 仓位管理、Mark Douglas 'Trading in the Zone' 交易心理、Michael Mauboussin、Nassim Taleb 'Fooled by Randomness/Antifragile')、加密原生 (Bitcoin whitepaper 中本聪、'The Bitcoin Standard' Saifedean、Vitalik 博客与 Ethereum whitepaper、'DeFi and the Future of Finance'、Lyn Alden 宏观、a16z crypto 文章、Messari/Delphi/Bankless 研报)、链上分析方法 (Glassnode/CryptoQuant 教程、Nansen/Arkham/Dune 文档、Dune Analytics SQL)、交易方法论散见于 podcast/Substack/Twitter thread 而非书; (e) figures/流派 — 价值/基本面派 (Vitalik Buterin 以太坊、Hasu/Su Zhu(争议)、Arthur Hayes BitMEX 创始人/宏观+衍生品、Raoul Pal、Lyn Alden 宏观、Cobie/Jordan Fish UpOnly podcast、DeFi 研究 Bankless Ryan Adams/David Hoffman); 链上分析派 (Nansen Alex Svanevik、Arkham、Adam Cochran、Ansem(blknoiz06) 链上交易、Murad memecoin supercycle、链上侦探 ZachXBT 反诈); 合约/衍生品派 (Arthur Hayes、GCR(GiganticRebirth) 传奇合约、Pentoshi、CryptoCred 技术分析、Tyler Durden); meme/叙事派 (Ansem、Murad、Cobie、各 Solana memecoin KOL); 宏观/周期派 (Raoul Pal、Lyn Alden、PlanB stock-to-flow(争议)、Benjamin Cowen 数据/周期); 量化/系统化 (各匿名量化、Hyperliquid 生态); 中文圈 (链上分析/合约 KOL、币圈大 V、播客如 '无人之境'/'Web3 佛学院'、研究机构如 Foresight/PANews/律动 BlockBeats); 反诈/安全 (ZachXBT、SlowMist 慢雾、go+ 安全); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — 现货 spot / 合约 perps 永续 / 杠杆 leverage / 多空 long-short / 爆仓 liquidation 清算 / 资金费率 funding rate / 开多开空 / 止损 SL 止盈 TP / 仓位 position sizing / 满仓梭哈 ape in / 梭 / FOMO / FUD / 钻石手 diamond hands / 纸手 paper hands / 韭菜 / 镰刀 / 庄 / 出货 / 拉盘砸盘 / 插针 wick / 针 / 上车下车 / 埋伏 / 潜伏 / 链上 on-chain / 钱包 wallet / 地址 / 聪明钱 smart money / 巨鲸 whale / 跟单 copy-trade / 老鼠仓 / 貔貅盘 honeypot / 貔貅 / rug 跑路 rug-pull / 归零 / 土狗 (memecoin/小币) / 金狗 (暴涨百倍) / meme 币 / 叙事 narrative / 赛道 / 板块轮动 / 撸毛 撸空投 airdrop / 女巫 sybil / 交互 / 解锁 unlock / 砸盘解锁 / 代币经济学 tomomics / TVL / APY APR / 无常损失 IL / 滑点 slippage / MEV / 三明治 sandwich / gas / 抢跑 frontrun / 貔貅检测 / 授权 approve / 撤销授权 revoke / 私钥 助记词 seed phrase / 冷钱包 热钱包 / 自托管 / 减半 halving / 牛熊 / 山寨季 altseason / 比特币市占率 BTC.D / 山寨 alt / 主流币 / DeFi 暑期 / GM / WAGMI / NGMI / 归零归零 / PvP / Ponzi 庞氏; (g) 争议/批

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check that a document's claims about code are actually true by reading the prose, the code, and the tests and reporting (or fixing) where they disagree. Use whenever the user wants to verify a README, guide, spec, or docstring still matches the code; whenever they mention documentation drift, doc-code sync, "is this still accurate", stale docs, or keeping docs/tests/code consistent; before publishing or merging a docs change; or as a periodic doc-accuracy sweep. The agent reads the prose's meaning directly — there is no claim-comment DSL to maintain. Pairs with TDD — the test suite is the deterministic behavioral gate, this skill is the semantic prose-vs-reality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and audit deterministic verification gates — a check that blocks a pipeline and can be shown to go red. Use when writing a calibration gate, CI check, validation script or pre-publication check for a numeric or empirical result; when a plausible-but-wrong value would survive review; when asking whether an existing test, linter rule or check could actually fail; and when a suite passes first try, passes suspiciously often, or was written by whatever produced the thing it checks. Triggers on "can this check fail", "known-bad", "negative control", "calibration gate", "sanity check my results", "is this test actually testing anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start long-lived provider LLM teammates as native Claude Code agent-team members (the native Agent tool with a ccf-<provider> type) that you message with SendMessage — multi-turn, collaborative, watchable in tmux panes. Use for sustained parallel build/work ("start 3 glm teammates", N teammates on N files), or when you need a collaborator you message across turns, from a terminal `claude` session. NOT a fire-and-forget one-shot or a flat batch of independent prompts — that is /cc-fleet:subagent. NOT a scripted multi-phase run — that is /cc-fleet:workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and write deterministic multi-agent workflow scripts (.js files in .claude/workflows/) for Claude Code's Workflow tool. Use when a user wants to build, create, author, scaffold, or run a custom Claude Code workflow, orchestrate sub-agents (fan-out, pipeline, loop, judge-panel), or automate a repeatable multi-step task across fresh-context agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, review, and refactor Reddit comments for any company by providing a domain URL and a Reddit thread. Dynamically extracts product knowledge, approved terminology, voice and tone, and positioning guidelines from the domain before writing. Use this skill whenever the user provides a domain and a Reddit thread and asks to write, draft, review, or refactor a Reddit comment or engagement reply. Trigger on inputs like "Domain: [url] Thread: [url or paste]", "write a Reddit comment for this domain", "draft an engagement for this thread", or any variation where a company URL and a Reddit thread are both provided. Always use this skill — never write Reddit comments for a domain without following this full workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage AI agent fleets in Herdr: tile root + sub-agents in one tab, start/prompt/wait/read/monitor via the herdr agent CLI, steer any pane; `help` lists every operation. Use for Herdr fleets. Don't use for tmux, screen, or non-Herdr terminals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic deep research via RivalSearchMCP. 9 tools: 5-engine web search (DuckDuckGo/Bing/Yahoo/Mojeek/Wikipedia), 9-platform social search (Reddit/HN/StackOverflow/Dev.to/Medium/ProductHunt/Bluesky/Lobste.rs/Lemmy), 5-source news (Google/Bing/Guardian/GDELT/DDG), 5 academic DBs (OpenAlex/CrossRef/arXiv/PubMed/EuropePMC), GitHub search, website mapping, content extraction with OCR, and research topic synthesis. No API keys required. Use when the user needs web research, competitive analysis, content discovery, or academic paper search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。