本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

workflow-builder

Design and write deterministic multi-agent workflow scripts (.js files in .claude/workflows/) for Claude Code's Workflow tool. Use when a user wants to build, create, author, scaffold, or run a custom Claude Code workflow, orchestrate sub-agents (fan-out, pipeline, loop, judge-panel), or automate a repeatable multi-step task across fresh-context agents.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(15)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • assets/examples/pr-triage.js3.5 KB
  • assets/templates/fan-out.js1.1 KB
  • assets/templates/loop-until-budget.js1.2 KB
  • assets/templates/pipeline.js1.2 KB
  • expected_outputs/intake_pr_review.json1.2 KB
  • expected_outputs/scaffold_pipeline.js1.2 KB
  • expected_outputs/validate_sample.txt555 B
  • README.md1.3 KB
  • references/api_reference.md5.5 KB
  • references/decision_and_intake_guide.md5.1 KB
  • references/orchestration_patterns.md4.7 KB
  • scripts/scaffold_workflow.py6.7 KB
  • scripts/validate_workflow.py10.7 KB
  • scripts/workflow_intake.py10.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Workflow Builder

Author runnable workflow scripts for Claude Code's Workflow tool: deterministic multi-agent orchestration files (.js) that fan work out to fresh-context sub-agents under plain JavaScript control flow. Only leaf agent() calls spend tokens, so the main session stays clean and the whole run is resumable.

ALWAYS start every session with intake (non-negotiable)

Before proposing or writing any workflow, run the intake. Do not skip to code.

  1. Ask what kind of workflow they want. Use this opening question set:

    • What repeatable, multi-step task do you want to automate?
    • What is the one unit of work a single sub-agent does once?
    • How many units — a known list, or discovered by looping?
    • Do later steps need all prior results at once, or can each item flow on its own?
    • Does any step need structured data back (a verdict, a list, scores)?
    • Roughly how many tokens / how deep should it go?
  2. If the user is vague, do NOT stall. Run the recommendation engine to turn whatever you have into 1-2 concrete proposals, then present them with the reasoning:

    python scripts/workflow_intake.py --task "their description" \
      --units unknown --stages unknown --needs-all unknown --structured unknown
    

    The engine returns a recommended topology (fan-out / pipeline / loop / barrier / judge-panel), model picks, a budget guard, and a one-line rationale per choice. Present those as "Here's what I'd build and why" — never ask the user to re-answer questions they already half-answered.

  3. Confirm the shape with the user (topology + phases + parallel-vs-pipeline) before writing the file. This is the only approval gate.

See references/decision_and_intake_guide.md for the full question framework, the vague-input playbook, and worked recommendation examples.

Decide if a workflow is even the right tool

ScenarioUse
Single sub-agent, one taskplain Agent tool
Reusable procedure, Claude picks steps dynamicallya Skill
Many sub-agents in a fixed topology, deterministic + resumableWorkflow ✓

Workflows earn their cost when work is parallel or multi-stage, must be reproducible, long enough to fail halfway (so resume matters), or benefits from isolating each step in its own context window. For one-off tasks, just use Claude directly.

Build → validate → run loop

  1. Scaffold a starter from the confirmed topology:
    python scripts/scaffold_workflow.py --topology pipeline --name pr-triage \
      --description "Triage open PRs" > .claude/workflows/pr-triage.js
    
  2. Edit the file: meta block first (pure literal, first statement), then the async body using the injected globals — agent(), pipeline(), parallel(), phase(), log(), budget, args, workflow(). Full surface in references/api_reference.md; copy-paste shapes in references/orchestration_patterns.md.
  3. Validate before running — catches the parser-fatal mistakes:
    python scripts/validate_workflow.py .claude/workflows/pr-triage.js
    
  4. Run it: enable the feature with export CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOWS=1, save the file under .claude/workflows/, then use /workflows to launch and watch it live. Press P to pause/resume, X to skip a sub-agent. Failed agents retry automatically.

Hard rules (validator enforces these)

  • meta is a pure literal and the first statement — no variables, spreads, template strings, or function calls inside it.
  • No non-determinism: Date.now(), Math.random(), argless new Date() break resume — pass timestamps via args.
  • No filesystem / Node APIs (require, fs, process, network) in the orchestrator — that work belongs inside agent() prompts.
  • parallel() takes thunks (() => agent(...)), not bare promises. Default to pipeline() unless a stage needs the whole prior result set.
  • Guard every open-ended loop with a counter or budget.remaining() check — unguarded loops hit the 1000-agent cap.
  • Filter skipped/failed agents: results.filter(Boolean).

Tooling

  • scripts/workflow_intake.py — intake recommendation engine (topology + model + budget + rationale from vague input).
  • scripts/validate_workflow.py — stdlib linter for the rules above; PASS / WARN / FAIL with line numbers.
  • scripts/scaffold_workflow.py — generate a starter .js for any topology.
  • assets/templates/ — fan-out, pipeline, loop-until-budget starters. assets/examples/ — a complete runnable workflow.

All scripts run with --sample (no args) and --help.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Format CVs for academic positions with publications, grants, and teaching

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Create accessibility testing plans covering assistive technologies and WCAG criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'ad performance optimization,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' or 'I need more ad variations.' Use this whenever someone needs to produce ad copy at scale or iterate on existing ads. For campaign strategy and targeting, see ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

Infrasity-Labs のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する