1,378 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when working with Banana Dev — banana.dev ML inference platform management covering model inventory, deployment status, API call history, GPU allocation, scaling configuration, build logs, and latency metrics. Use for comprehensive Banana.dev model deployment assessment and inference performance analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Baseten — baseten ML deployment platform management covering model inventory, deployment status, autoscaling configuration, inference call history, GPU allocation, environment management, and performance metrics. Use for comprehensive Baseten workspace assessment and ML serving optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Appwrite — appwrite backend platform management covering project inventory, database collections, user authentication stats, storage bucket usage, function deployments, webhook configuration, and platform health. Use for comprehensive Appwrite project assessment and resource monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Aws Organizations — aWS Organizations account management, OU structure analysis, SCP policy review, and service access control. Covers organizational hierarchy, account inventory, policy inheritance analysis, delegated administrator status, and service control boundary assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Azure Policy — azure Policy compliance assessment, policy and initiative assignment management, remediation task tracking, and definition analysis via Azure CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Kubescape — kubescape Kubernetes security posture analysis. Covers NSA/CISA framework assessment, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, CIS Kubernetes benchmarks, workload scanning, RBAC analysis, and network policy evaluation. Use when assessing Kubernetes cluster security, evaluating compliance frameworks, or analyzing workload configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Wiz — wiz cloud security posture management. Covers cloud security posture analysis, vulnerability prioritization, attack path analysis, compliance assessment, container security, and resource inventory. Use when assessing cloud security posture, investigating attack paths, prioritizing vulnerabilities, or auditing cloud compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve and analyze AlphaFold predicted structures for a protein. Use when the user provides a specific UniProt Accession ID and wants structural confidence metrics (pLDDT), domain boundary analysis, or disorder assessment. Do not use if the user only has a protein name, gene name, or amino acid sequence — ask for a UniProt ID first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EdTech Specialist IA — Expert en technologies éducatives (LMS, SCORM, adaptive learning, gamification, assessment)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en transformation digitale (strategy, change management, technology adoption, maturity assessment)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en création de cours avancé (curriculum, video, LMS, assessments, community, monetization)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en audit interne (risk assessment, controls, compliance, recommendations, DZ context)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Rails apps and provide upgrade assessments
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose your taste gaps across six skill areas. Know what to practice. Use when starting a taste development program, checking progress, or identifying specific areas to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Name what was prioritized, what was sacrificed, and whether the tradeoff was right. Every design decision trades something. Use when evaluating design decisions, defending choices, or helping teams understand what they're giving up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analytical methodology skill for intelligence-grade research. Covers cognitive security, logical fallacy detection, source epistemology, and probability discipline. Load when evaluating sources, building analytical assessments, or detecting manipulation in information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "pentest WordPress sites", "scan WordPress for vulnerabilities", "enumerate WordPress users, themes, or plugins", "exploit WordPress vulnerabilities", or "use WPScan". It provides comprehensive WordPress security assessment methodologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。