1,936 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run all TMDb unit tests (Swift Testing, the TMDb test plan). Use after code changes and before a PR to verify unit tests pass — delegates the run to the tooling-runner agent (Haiku) and returns total/passed/failed counts plus each failure as Suite/test with file:line. For the live-API suite, use /integration-test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix the currently-failing status checks on the current branch's PR in one sweep — route each failing check to the right diagnosis skill (via a Haiku subagent, escalating to Opus on a repeat failure), apply and verify the fix, commit, and push once — then return a summary. Use standalone when CI is red, or as the check-fixing step invoked by /watch-pr. Repo is adamayoung/TMDb.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose a failing CI workflow run (lint, markdown lint, build, or unit tests) — identify which job failed, the cause, and a concrete fix
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously cut a Rove (`@sma1lboy/rove`) release end-to-end — detect the semver bump from pending changesets (flagging an upstream `minor` you didn't intend), run the release gates, dispatch the Changesets workflow (or run `scripts/release.sh` locally), then poll the GitHub Actions Release workflow with `gh` until npm publish completes, diagnosing CI failures (npm token, registry 404, lint, branch mismatch) instead of leaving them silent. Use when the user says "cut a release", "ship a version", "release Rove", "release rove", "发版", "release.sh", or "bump the version". Never force-pushes; always verifies the release landed on `main`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds the cause of a hard bug by running several read-only subagents in parallel, each attacking it from a different angle (change history, code path, data and state, environment, reproduction), then checking their evidence, ranking the hypotheses and naming the one experiment that would confirm the leader. It diagnoses and does not fix. Use when someone says "hunt this bug with multiple agents", "swarm on this regression", "investigate in parallel", "find the root cause", or when a failure is intermittent, crosses components, or has resisted a first look.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production incident response - from detection through resolution to post-mortem. Effective communication, systematic investigation, and blameless learning from failuresUse when "incident, outage, production issue, site down, on-call, post-mortem, war room, severity, pages, alerts, rollback, incident, outage, on-call, post-mortem, production, reliability, SRE, communication" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in presenting technical work to non-technical audiences. Covers demo preparation, storytelling for demos, handling failures gracefully, and making work visible and impressive. Understands that perception is reality and great work undemoed is invisible work. Use when "demo, present, show stakeholders, demo day, showcase, walkthrough, show and tell, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% by step 10. Build for reliability first, autonomy second. 2025 lesson: The winners are constrained, domain-specific agents with clear boundaries, not "autonomous everything." Treat AI outputs as proposals, not truth. Use when "autonomous agent, autogpt, babyagi, self-prompting, goal decomposition, react pattern, agent loop, self-correcting agent, reflection agent, langgraph, agentic ai, agent planning, autonomous, agents, langgraph, react, planning, reflection, guardrails, reliability, checkpointing" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CI/CD is the backbone of modern software delivery. Continuous Integration catches bugs early. Continuous Deployment gets features to users fast. But poorly designed pipelines can be slow, flaky, and a source of constant frustration. This skill covers GitHub Actions (the most popular), GitLab CI, and general pipeline design principles. The focus is on pipelines that are fast, reliable, and maintainable. 2025 reality: Your pipeline is infrastructure code. It deserves the same care as your application. A flaky test in CI is worse than no test - it teaches developers to ignore failures. Use when "github actions, gitlab ci, ci cd, pipeline, workflow, deploy automation, continuous integration, continuous deployment, build pipeline, yaml workflow, ci-cd, github-actions, gitlab-ci, devops, automation, deployment, pipelines" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial senior-engineer review for agent-generated plans, designs, and architectures. Treats the current output as junior work, constructs a senior reviewer whose domain expertise comes from live codebase research plus web research of current best practices, diagnoses altitude failures (too vague or too granular), then rewrites the plan into a scoped, state-of-the-art version. Use when the user says "junior to senior", "senior review", "review this like a staff engineer", when a plan feels hand-wavy or lost in details, or before committing to any agent-written plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests. Use after happy-path tests exist and before claiming coverage is complete, when requirements lack tests, or before a security review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Captures reusable knowledge after work is done — learnings from feedback or failures, resolved bugs (symptom, root cause, prevention), and recurring code patterns — into the project's persistent memory file. Use after feedback, a non-trivial bug fix, a failed attempt, or the third repetition of a pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches real projects, papers, and documented failures before proposing a new feature, architecture, or technology choice. Use for design decisions with multiple valid approaches, not for implementing an existing spec or fixing a known bug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refuses "flaky" as a diagnosis. Turns an intermittent failure into a reproduction by isolating it from the environment, naming the variable that controls it, forcing that variable, and measuring before and after with enough runs to count. Separates real defects from environment contention with evidence, and never retries to green or widens a threshold. Use when a test, performance check, or deploy step fails intermittently or passes on rerun.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DevOps 与站点可靠性工程 (SRE) — 平台 / 基础设施 / 可靠性工程师的认知操作系统, 覆盖软件交付 + 运维全生命周期 (CI/CD 与发布工程 trunk-based + 渐进式发布 canary/blue-green/feature flag + GitOps Argo CD/Flux / 基础设施即代码 Terraform/OpenTofu/Pulumi/Ansible + policy-as-code OPA / 容器与编排 Docker/Kubernetes + Helm/Kustomize + service mesh Istio/Linkerd / 可观测性 Prometheus + Loki + OpenTelemetry + Honeycomb + eBPF + RED/USE / SLO-SLI-error budget 与可靠性工程 Google SRE 学科 + 容量规划 + 优雅降级 / 事件管理与 on-call 事件指挥 + PagerDuty + runbook + 无指责复盘 + MTTR / 云平台与 FinOps AWS/GCP/Azure + 成本优化 + 弹性伸缩 / 平台工程与开发者体验 IDP + Backstage + golden path + Team Topologies / DevSecOps 与供应链安全 shift-left + SBOM + SLSA + sigstore + Vault / 韧性与混沌工程 fault injection + game day + 安全科学 / DORA 指标与工程效能 部署频率 + 变更前置时间 + 变更失败率 + Accelerate 研究 / 数据库与有状态运维 schema 迁移 + 备份容灾) — 不含 通用应用开发 / 纯云销售认证速成 / 'DevOps = 跑 Jenkins 的岗位' 窄化误解 / ITIL 工单文化传统运维 (旧范式仅做边界) / 把手工运维 ClickOps 当稳态 (是 toil, 本 skill 核心反模式) (DevOps & Site Reliability Engineering — the cognitive operating system of platform / infrastructure / reliability practitioners who own the full software delivery + operational lifecycle, covering (a) CI/CD & release engineering (build pipelines, trunk-based development, progressive delivery — canary / blue-green / feature flags, GitOps with Argo CD / Flux), (b) Infrastructure as Code (Terraform / OpenTofu, Pulumi, CloudFormation, Ansible, Crossplane — module design, state management, drift, policy-as-code OPA / Sentinel / Checkov), (c) containers & orchestration (Docker / OCI, Kubernetes — scheduling, networking CNI, storage CSI, operators / CRDs, Helm / Kustomize, service mesh Istio / Linkerd), (d) observability (the three pillars + beyond — metrics Prometheus / VictoriaMetrics, logs Loki / ELK, traces OpenTelemetry / Jaeger / Tempo, high-cardinality observability Honeycomb, eBPF, RED / USE methods, SLO-based alerting), (e) SLO / SLI / error budgets & reliability engineering (Google SRE discipline — service level objectives, error budget policy, toil budgets, capacity planning, load shedding, graceful degradation), (f) incident management & on-call (incident command, PagerDuty / Opsgenie, runbooks, blameless postmortems, MTTR / MTTD, error budget burn), (g) cloud platforms & FinOps (AWS / GCP / Azure well-architected, multi-region, cost optimization, autoscaling), (h) platform engineering & developer experience (internal developer platforms, Backstage, golden paths, self-service, Team Topologies), (i) DevSecOps & supply-chain security (shift-left, SAST / DAST, SBOM, SLSA, sigstore / cosign, secrets management Vault), (j) resilience & chaos engineering (chaos experiments, fault injection, game days, resilience engineering / safety science), (k) DORA metrics & engineering effectiveness (deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, MTTR, the Accelerate research), (l) databases & stateful operations (schema migrations, backups / DR, replication); NOT generic software development / app feature coding (是 平行学科, DevOps/SRE 关注 delivery + operability 不是 product feature), NOT pure cloud sales / certification cram without operational depth, NOT 'DevOps = a job title that runs Jenkins' 的窄化误解 (DevOps 是 文化 + 实践, SRE 是 Google 对 reliability 的工程化具体实现), NOT ITIL-heavy 传统运维 工单文化 (是 被 DevOps 取代的旧范式, 仅做边界标注), NOT manual ops / ClickOps as a steady state (是 toil, 本 skill 的核心反模式).) Master OS — automated mastery of DevOps & Site Reliability Engineering — the cognitive operating system of platform / infrastructure / reliability practitioners who own the full software delivery + operational lifecycle, covering (a) CI/CD & release engineering (build pipelines, trunk-based development, progressive delivery — canary / blue-green / feature flags, GitOps with Argo CD / Flux), (b) Infrastructure as Code (Terraform / OpenTofu, Pulumi, CloudFormation, Ansible, Crossplane — module design, state management, drift, policy-as-code OPA / Sentinel / Checkov), (c) containers & orchestration (Docker / OCI, Kubernetes — scheduling, networking CNI, storage CSI, operators / CRDs, He
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined, validation-gated revision of an EXISTING skill so each edit is a measured improvement rather than a guess. Use when editing, revising, or tuning a skill that already exists and there is evidence it underperforms (observed failures, drift, complaints) — invoke by name, or have versioning-skills / creating-skill defer to it before applying edits. Not for authoring a brand-new skill from scratch (use creating-skill) or one-off prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and revises a complete skill DIRECTORY — SKILL.md, scripts, references, assets — and packages it. Use for "create a skill for X", "turn this into a skill", "update/improve this skill", "why doesn't my skill trigger", "review this SKILL.md", "package this skill", or when a repeated procedure should become a reusable artifact. Enforces the structure that makes skills work — a concrete procedure rather than a goal statement, an explicit applicability boundary, failure modes with their signals, a runtime verification step, and a description checked against the existing catalogue for confusability. For choosing whether the instruction should be a skill at all rather than project instructions or a prompt, use crafting-instructions. For writing quality inside the prose, use writing-instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dùng khi viết hoặc sửa prompt tạo video/ảnh AI (Veo 3, Google Flow, Kling, Runway, Sora, Midjourney, Hailuo, Luma): từ vựng chuẩn về góc máy, chuyển động camera, ánh sáng, bố cục, phong cách, màu, cảm xúc công thức ghép prompt, và bài học thực chiến về lỗi model AI hay gặp. Use when writing or fixing AI video/image prompts — cinematic camera angles, camera movement, lighting, composition, style, color grading, mood, a prompt formula, and real-world lessons on common AI video model failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Odoo 19 development knowledge base with 18 specialized guides covering Actions (ir.actions.*, cron jobs, server actions), Controllers (HTTP routing, endpoints, auth types), Data files (XML/CSV records, shortcuts, noupdate), API Decorators (@api.depends, @api.constrains, @api.ondelete, @api.onchange, @api.model, @api.private), SQL Constraints (models.Constraint replacing _sql_constraints), Database Indexes (models.Index), Module development (manifest, wizards, reports), Field types (Char, Text, Monetary, relational fields), Manifest configuration (__manifest__.py, dependencies, asset bundles), Mixins (mail.thread, mail.activity.mixin, mail.alias.mixin, utm.mixin), ORM Model methods (search, CRUD, domain filters, recordsets, CamelCase model naming), Migration scripts (pre/post/end hooks, data migration), OWL frontend components (hooks, services, lifecycle), Performance optimization (N+1 prevention, batch ops, _read_group), QWeb Reports (PDF/HTML, paper formats, barcodes, t-out), Security/ACL (record rules, field permissions, privilege-based groups, @api.private), Testing (TransactionCase, HttpCase, mocking, query count assertions), Transactions (savepoints, UniqueViolation, serialization failures), Translations (i18n, PO files, translatable fields), XML Views (list/form/search, kanban card templates, xpath inheritance, QWeb templates). Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging any Odoo 19 Python or XML code, creating or modifying modules, fixing performance issues, or looking up Odoo 19 API patterns and best practices. Includes CSS/SCSS asset authoring and review for Odoo addons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants preview QA, failure interpretation, release readiness, or an explicit publish handoff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design search experiences that help users find what they need, recover from failure, and refine results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when debugging Go errors, test failures, or unexpected behavior — step-by-step diagnosis approach
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply this skill whenever the user is navigating early-stage startups, bootstrapping, product innovation, branding, or overcoming the fear of failure. Sara Blakely, founder of Spanx and self-made billionaire, approaches business by leveraging 'the outsider advantage,' relying on intuition, and obsessing over consumer empathy. Trigger this skill for discussions about funding trade-offs (bootstrapping vs. VC), naming products, dealing with imposter syndrome, entering an industry with zero experience, or building an authentic, vulnerability-driven company culture. Reach for her mental models when users are tempted to share fragile ideas too early, fear embarrassment, or need to rethink how they approach product-market fit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。