1,486 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build reactive, type-safe, production-grade backends. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks to build, plan, design, or implement backend features, APIs, data models, server logic, database schemas, web apps, full stack apps, or mobile apps. This includes planning and architecture discussions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicitly build a disposable logic or UI prototype to answer one design question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a test that can fail. Use whenever adding a test, when a suite is being created for a project that has none, when asked to raise coverage, or before claiming a behaviour is covered. Covers the oracle problem, when to choose the integration suite over the unit one, and how to prove the test is not tautological.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts security testing of REST, GraphQL, and gRPC APIs to identify vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, rate limiting, input validation, and business logic. The tester uses the OWASP API Security Top 10 as the testing framework, combining Burp Suite interception with Postman collections and custom scripts to test endpoint security at every privilege level. Activates for requests involving API security testing, REST API pentest, GraphQL security assessment, or API vulnerability testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune detection logic for reducing false positives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deobfuscates malicious JavaScript code used in web-based attacks, phishing pages, and dropper scripts by reversing encoding layers, eval chains, string manipulation, and control flow obfuscation to reveal the original malicious logic. Activates for requests involving JavaScript malware analysis, script deobfuscation, web skimmer analysis, or obfuscated dropper investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds vendor-agnostic detection rules using the Sigma rule format for threat detection across SIEM platforms including Splunk, Elastic, and Microsoft Sentinel. Use when creating portable detection logic from threat intelligence, mapping rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or converting community Sigma rules into platform-specific queries using sigmac or pySigma backends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill covers deploying Microsoft Sentinel as a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform for centralized security operations. It details configuring data connectors for multi-cloud log ingestion, writing KQL detection queries, building automated response playbooks with Logic Apps, and leveraging the Sentinel data lake for petabyte-scale threat hunting across AWS, Azure, and GCP security telemetry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get current weather and forecasts via wttr.in or Open-Meteo. Use when: user asks about weather, temperature, or forecasts for any location. NOT for: historical weather data, severe weather alerts, or detailed meteorological analysis. No API key needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete SolanaOS agent skill — install, configure, and operate the autonomous Solana trading runtime with Honcho v3 epistemological memory, multi-venue perp trading (Hyperliquid + Aster), on-chain intelligence with USD pricing, Telegram bot, gateway API, Tailscale mesh, hardware integration, and cross-session recall. Use when asked to install SolanaOS, query Solana blockchain data, manage wallets, run OODA trading loops, configure strategies, control BitAxe mining fleets, pair Seeker devices, or operate any SolanaOS runtime surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formally verify programs by writing Lean 4 proofs. Trigger this skill whenever the user wants to formally verify code, generate Lean 4 proofs, prove properties about algorithms or smart contracts, verify invariants, convert program logic into formal specifications, or anything involving Lean 4 and formal verification. Also trigger when the user mentions "qedgen", "lean proof", "formal proof", "verify my code", "prove correctness", "formal verification", or wants mathematical guarantees about their implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when you need to review presentation materials from an audience perspective to improve their quality and effectiveness. Evaluates content clarity, visual design, logical flow, engagement factors, and Marp technical compatibility. Triggers include "review my presentation", "check my slides", "presentation feedback", or when a user has completed a draft presentation and wants comprehensive quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
대화형 System-wide Refactoring — 변경 파일에서 Extract Method·Domain Logic 이동·Pull Up 등 클래스 경계를 넘는 구조 변경 후보를 찾아 승인 후 기법별 커밋으로 적용. "구조 리팩토링", "도메인 로직 이동", "클래스 분리", "system-wide", "/system-wide-refactoring" 요청 시 사용. 단, 메서드 내부 정돈(guard clause·extract variable 등)은 /tdd-tidy가 적합. /system-wide-refactoring [commit-ref]로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor duplicated code by extracting helpers, shared abstractions, or clearer reusable structure. Use when asked to apply DRY, remove duplication, consolidate repeated logic, or run `/refactor:dry`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Steven's Bash script style rules: strict mode, minimal validation, concise logic, executable scripts, and no unnecessary comments or echoes. Use when creating, reviewing, or refactoring shell scripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when editing Blazor `.razor.css`, scoped selectors, `::deep`, BEM class names, RTL/logical CSS properties, or styling nested MudBlazor components; not for global design tokens or non-Blazor CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Throwaway design probe for logic, state models, UI variations, and affordances before production work. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a model, make something playable, compare UI directions, or explore a design before ln-spec/ln-plan/ln-scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。