「step」の検索結果

Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about AI coding agents, agent runtimes, or similar internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct and report long-running or multi-turn research, architecture questions, reviews, decisions, completion results, and status as a clear, self-contained brief. Use when a reader must re-enter earlier context, understand the real question and its relationships, distinguish verified facts from judgment and open evidence, or make a decision without reconstructing the work log. Quote the relevant original user wording before substantive analysis, keep one coherent main line, use spatial diagrams when relationships matter, and finish with an explicit decision boundary and practical next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning a modeling solution, selecting the next useful step or briefing a specialist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SDT 内容生产工具箱的总入口：根据当前任务选择最合适的 sdt-* 模块，既能完成标题、开头等单一步骤，也能组织从账号研究到发布的完整流程。用户不知道该用哪个 SDT Skill，或希望一站式完成内容生产时使用。 English: Main entry point for the SDT content-production toolkit. Use when the user is unsure which sdt-* skill to choose, wants a single step such as a title or hook, or wants an end-to-end workflow from account research to publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers assessment of third country legal frameworks, supplementary measures evaluation, and TIA scoring. Activate for international data transfers, SCCs, third-country adequacy, or Chapter V compliance. Keywords: TIA, Schrems II, transfer assessment, EDPB, supplementary measures, SCCs, international transfer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers destination country surveillance law assessment, European Essential Guarantees evaluation, and supplementary measures determination. Keywords: TIA, transfer impact assessment, Schrems II, EDPB recommendations, supplementary measures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without trusting self-reported success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce time-to-first-API-call (TTFAC) by optimizing every step of the developer onboarding journey. This skill covers authentication simplification, sandbox environments, interactive documentation, and identifying and eliminating common failure points.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

XML-specified Android UI journey testing, interactive step execution, assertion verification, and JSON outcome reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage failed Agent QA runs with MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, fixed failure categories, confidence, and actionable next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report which workflow artifacts exist, which RFCs are implemented and reviewed, what has drifted, and the next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surfaces Han's shared standard for explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it into the calling skill's own context, so the caller writes its escalations, confirmation turns, and stops as a concrete outcome the reader could observe rather than as a mechanism. Use when a skill is about to ask a person a question, stop for an input, or explain a technical consequence to someone who will not open the code. Governs what a run says to a person in a turn, where readability-guidance governs the shape of a written deliverable. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Carries guidance only and adds no self-check step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoritative guidance for building Claude Code skills, agents, and plugins, plus init and update steps that install and refresh the plugin-building skills in the current repository. Use when you need the rules or best practices for a skill, agent, hook, or plugin — designing, reviewing, hardening, or checking one against the guidance. Run with `init` to vendor the guidance, skill-builder, and agent-builder skills into the current repository (so they run with no dependency on this plugin) plus a path-scoped rule index, or `update` to refresh an already-vendored copy. Does not run an interview to build a new skill or agent from scratch — use skill-builder or agent-builder. Does not write feature code, review application code, or build non-plugin features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-router owner for authoring or regenerating presentation visuals through the PPT Master SVG pipeline: new decks from source material or a topic, PPTX re-architecture, generation from an already-created reusable SVG-template workspace, and shared SVG steps only after a strict 1:1 beautify workflow explicitly hands off. Read workflows/routing.md first. Do not use for ambiguous existing-PPTX optimization, reusable-template creation, raw-PPTX native filling, or finished-PPTX native enhancement; those are pre-route or standalone workflow requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or audit SLOs, SLIs, alert rules, incident response steps, escalation paths, postmortems, operational runbooks, and customer-impact communication. Use when defining production reliability, preparing launch readiness, responding to an outage, writing a runbook, tuning alerts, or closing the loop after an incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guard long, ambiguous, or stateful AI-agent work from drift. Use when the user asks to run or continue a multi-step task, autonomous loop, bug fix, repo change, PR readiness check, compaction handoff, resume from previous context, cost-control checkpoint, or any task likely to span many tool calls, files, sessions, agents, or verification gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use dspy.RLM (Recursive Language Model) for reasoning over contexts too large to fit in an LLM's working window — entire codebases, long logs, massive documents, or multi-step data exploration that needs a sandboxed Python REPL. Use when the input is >100k tokens, needs recursive chunking, or benefits from the LLM writing and running code to probe data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites — navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, sharing a live browser view, narrating browser actions, extracting structured data, running assertions, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", "visual regression test", "check for prompt injection", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, navigate pages, fill forms, click buttons, take screenshots, share a live browser view, narrate browser actions, extract structured data, run assertions, test web apps, mock network requests, or automate any browser task. Triggers include "open a website", "fill out a form", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data", "test this web app", "login to a site", "visual regression test", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。