「eval」の検索結果

Extract a sanitized shared team/company brain from a personal brain. Strips internal ratings, compensation, performance assessments, retention and political dynamics from pages, takes, and facts across the full scan scope (people, companies, meetings, dailies, cross-references — not just people/), verifies with grep + retrieval passes, and purges sensitive git history behind the data-loss-gate confirmation card. Also runs as a report-only re-audit on an existing shared brain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a TYPED citation/reference graph over an ingested corpus — not just embeddings. Flat similarity retrieval cannot tell you that document A *overrules* B, *distinguishes* C, or *relies_on* D. This skill extracts every inter-document reference, classifies the edge TYPE with LLM judgment, and writes first-class typed edges via `gbrain link`, so `gbrain graph-query --type` can walk the argument ("everything this brief relies on, minus anything overruled since"). Every cite-heavy corpus is the same shape: law, academic papers, patents, regulatory filings, a book's bibliography.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build durable backend AI agents with the eve framework. Use when creating, editing, or debugging an eve project — agent instructions, skills, tools, connections, channels, sandboxes, subagents, schedules, or evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SOX sample selections, testing workpapers, and control assessments. Use when planning quarterly or annual SOX 404 testing, pulling a sample for a control (revenue, P2P, ITGC, close), building a testing workpaper template, or evaluating and classifying a control deficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide the user through an independent iFixAi audit of their own agent, checking whether it does the job it is supposed to do given their business rules and org structure. Prefer pointing it at the user's REAL deployed agent over its HTTP endpoint (its actual tools, retrieval, and governance) with `--provider http --endpoint <url>`; only when no endpoint is reachable, fall back to replicating the model beneath as a bare stand-in (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Azure, Bedrock, etc.). Graded by the judge(s) of their choice (the same model, one independent judge, or a cross-vendor panel). You are the operator who walks them through it and explains the scorecard, running the SAME `ifixai run` engine as the guided CLI. Use when the user asks to run iFixAi or to audit an agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns marketing prompts into tested, versioned production assets: A/B prompt evaluation against structured test cases, immutable prompt version history with diffs, ready-to-use marketing prompt templates (ad copy, email campaigns, social posts, landing pages, SEO meta), and an LLM-governance playbook for marketing teams (claim discipline, disclosure rules, human-review gates). Use when a marketing team relies on AI-generated content and needs prompt quality to be measurable and safe — or when the user mentions 'prompt engineering,' 'improve my prompts,' 'prompt templates,' 'prompt versioning,' 'AI content workflow,' or 'AI governance for marketing.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to build a free tool for marketing — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Use when they mention 'engineering as marketing,' 'free tool,' 'calculator,' 'generator,' 'checker,' 'grader,' 'marketing tool,' 'lead gen tool,' 'build something for traffic,' 'interactive tool,' or 'free resource.' Covers idea evaluation, tool design, and launch strategy. For pure SEO content strategy (no tool), use seo-audit or content-strategy instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a rigorous, sector-relative, multi-factor fundamental analysis of a publicly listed company — Indian (NSE/BSE) or US/global. Use when the user asks to analyse, research, evaluate, or value a stock, ticker, or listed company; asks whether a business is fundamentally strong, cheap, or expensive; compares companies or benchmarks one against its sector; or mentions OPM, ROCE, ROE, ROIC, P/E, EV/EBITDA, free cash flow, NIM, GNPA, CASA, promoter holding or pledging. Use it for accounting-quality and forensic questions — "is the profit real", "why is profit rising but cash isn't", auditor qualifications, related-party concerns — which route to the forensic-only mode, and for IPOs and not-yet-listed companies — "should I apply to this IPO", DRHP/RHP or S-1 questions, price band, grey market premium — which route to the IPO mode. Use it even when the request sounds casual ("is Infosys any good?"). Do not use it for personalised investment advice, portfolio allocation, or trading signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International market expansion strategy. Market selection, entry modes, localization, regulatory compliance, and go-to-market by region. Use when expanding to new countries, evaluating international markets, planning localization, or building regional teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General Counsel advisory for startups: contract review (MSA, SaaS, NDA, DPA, employment), IP strategy, term sheet decoding, and regulatory landscape mapping. Use when reviewing any contract or term sheet, deciding when to engage outside counsel, defining IP strategy, evaluating regulatory exposure (HIPAA, GDPR, FDA, fintech), or when user mentions general counsel, GC, legal review, contract risk, term sheet, IP assignment, or regulatory exposure. NOT a substitute for licensed counsel — surfaces questions to bring to qualified attorneys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revenue leadership for B2B SaaS companies. Revenue forecasting, sales model design, pricing strategy, net revenue retention, and sales team scaling. Use when designing the revenue engine, setting quotas, modeling NRR, evaluating pricing, building board forecasts, or when user mentions CRO, chief revenue officer, revenue strategy, sales model, ARR growth, NRR, expansion revenue, churn, pricing strategy, or sales capacity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes sales pipeline health, revenue forecasting accuracy, and go-to-market efficiency metrics for SaaS revenue optimization. Use when analyzing sales pipeline coverage, forecasting revenue, evaluating go-to-market performance, reviewing sales metrics, assessing pipeline analysis, tracking forecast accuracy with MAPE, calculating GTM efficiency, or measuring sales efficiency and unit economics for SaaS teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an Ansoff Matrix analysis mapping growth strategies across market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. Use when considering growth options, planning market expansion, or evaluating strategic growth paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a PESTLE analysis covering Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. Use when assessing the macro environment, doing strategic planning, or evaluating external factors affecting your business.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a Startup Canvas combining Product Strategy (9 sections) and Business Model (costs + revenue) for a new product. An alternative to BMC and Lean Canvas that separates strategy from business model. Use when launching a new product or evaluating a startup concept.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and design pricing strategies including pricing models, competitive pricing analysis, willingness-to-pay estimation, and price elasticity. Use when setting prices, evaluating pricing models, preparing for a pricing change, or comparing freemium vs paid approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。