「diff」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "find keywords", "挖词", or "搜什么词"; prioritizes search volume, keyword difficulty, intent, and topic clusters from provided or connected data. Not for competitor-relative coverage gaps — use content-gap-analysis. 关键词研究/内容选题

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "mine my search terms", "find new keywords from converting queries", "build a negative-keyword list", or "cut wasted paid spend"; harvests converting queries into new keywords/ad-groups, builds a standing negative-keyword list and an n-gram waste report from the search-terms export, and delivers a maintenance diff (add / negate / move). Not for account structure — use campaign-architect; not for budget split — use budget-optimizer; not for computing the final RQS — use ad-account-auditor. 付费广告搜索词挖掘/否定关键词/浪费词清单

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Von Restorff Effect — the element that differs from its neighbours is the one remembered. Use when a single action must dominate. For overall ordering rather than single-element emphasis, use `visual-hierarchy`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build several genuinely different solutions to the same problem at once, spread across what the user does rather than how it looks. Use when one direction is on the table and the team is about to refine it by default. For choosing between the concepts afterwards, use `concept-selection`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconcile what the numbers say with what users say, and design the study that settles it rather than restates it. Use when behavioural data and research findings point different ways. For reading the data on its own, use `behavioural-analytics`; for synthesising interviews on their own, use `affinity-diagram`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated code slop, unnecessary comments, and over-engineering from the current branch diff. Cleans up boilerplate, simplifies abstractions, strips defensive code, and in skill-file mode lints SKILL.md files for quality. Use when cleaning up code, simplifying, removing boilerplate, before committing, or when reviewing a skill before promoting it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the project's shared language and bounded contexts before writing code, so names stay consistent and the agent stops paraphrasing domain concepts. Produces a CONTEXT.md glossary and decision records. Use at the start of a project or feature, or when the codebase and the people describing it speak different languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates an API Gateway stage with CloudWatch logging, X-Ray tracing, throttling, WAF integration, and IAM roles following AWS best practices. Use when deploying a REST API to different environments such as dev, test, or production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors, deploys, and troubleshoots AWS infrastructure using CDK with TypeScript or Python. Covers best practices, stack architecture, and construct patterns. Applies when writing CDK constructs, bootstrapping environments, running cdk deploy/synth/diff, fixing CDK or CloudFormation errors, planning stack structure, importing existing resources, resolving drift, or refactoring stacks without resource replacement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在推送、标记 PR 就绪或声称“检查通过”之前，按 diff 触及的面选择最小而充分的本地检查，不反射式跑全量。覆盖 TypeScript、Rust、Renderer、发布脚本与 Gate 的选择规则，以及改写历史推送的保护。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate an Attio integration through a contract-led inventory, OpenAPI and documentation diff, shadow validation, canary rollout, reconciliation, and tested rollback. Use when endpoint assumptions, client versions, schemas, or integration architecture must change. Trigger with "upgrade Attio integration", "Attio migration", or "Attio API contract change".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose and implement Claude API architecture patterns for different scales: serverless, microservice, event-driven, and edge deployment. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic architecture", "claude serverless", "claude microservice design", "edge claude deployment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade identity-fabric mapping: tenant/federation fingerprinting and the pre-auth user-ENUMERATION oracle methodology — enumeration and fingerprint only, never credential submission. Covers domain-to-tenant resolution (Microsoft getuserrealm.srf Managed/Federated namespace check, Entra OIDC metadata tenant-GUID extraction, Autodiscover v2), keyless Microsoft tenant-federation mapping (GetFederationInformation SOAP -> sibling-domain discovery, discover-only ROE, FEDERATED_WITH provenance edge held out of attack-path pivoting), Okta org-slug derivation + OIDC fingerprint + governed custom-domain enumeration, ADFS passive/active fingerprint + version inference, Google Workspace MX-correlated detection, generic OIDC (Auth0/Keycloak/Ping Identity/OneLogin/Duo) discovery, SAML metadata (5 paths), Azure AD Seamless-SSO Negotiate-challenge detection, Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) sensor-API presence check, the user-enumeration oracle methodology for Microsoft GetCredentialType (IfExistsResult semantics: exists / doesn't-exist / exists-in-federated-tenant / throttled) and Okta /api/v1/authn (errorCode differential), Medium-detectability discipline with a hard 20-candidate-per-tenant cap and admin/role interest-based ranking, and name x confirmed-email-pattern login-candidate synthesis that FAILS CLOSED with zero output when no org pattern is confirmed. Grounded directly in a production ASM implementation's sso_idp.py, tenant_recon.py, and core/email_patterns.py modules. Deepens — does not duplicate — offensive-osint skill's Identity Fabric endpoint reference with the tenant-federation MAP, the oracle WORKFLOW, and the candidate-SYNTHESIS methodology that reference lacks. Use when fingerprinting an organization's identity provider, mapping its tenant/federation boundary, running an authorized pre-auth user-enumeration pass, or synthesizing login candidates from harvested names to feed that oracle — never for password spray, credential submission, or auth bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a skillshare change before it becomes a pull request, or review an open pull request. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: review a diff, branch, commit range or PR, check a change before opening a PR, run a pre-Codex review, or find what a change missed. It checks correctness, the repository's documented rules, the originating issue or spec, every consumer of a changed concept, and cleanup (reuse, simplification, efficiency, depth of fix), then verifies each finding against the code before reporting it. Read-only unless the user asks for fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track different resume versions, maintain master resume, manage tailored versions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create targeted resume sections optimized for different experience levels and roles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-gate leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author SVG figures for Grida docs — diff-able, version-controlled vector diagrams embedded in doc pages instead of screenshots. Provides reusable primitives (selection chrome, size badges, anchor pins, resize cursors, click ripples), color/typography tokens, a starter template, and finished examples to crib from. Canvas user docs (docs/editor/) are the first consumer; the kit is meant to generalize to any product's docs. Use when drawing diagrams that explain UI behaviour — gestures, alignment, before/after states — that a screenshot alone can't capture. Trigger phrases: "svg diagram", "draw a figure", "visual for docs", "explain this gesture visually", "before/after diagram".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-PR discipline for a public-by-default repo. What a reviewer enforces beyond CI: secrets and internal data in diffs or screenshots, docs that name their reader, and the cleaning pass where incomplete or confusing artifacts get dropped. Use before opening any PR against `gridaco/grida` or when finalizing work for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。