1.4万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill when the user asks about accident registers, DOT-recordable accident definitions, what counts as a "reportable accident" under 49 CFR 390.5 + 390.15, accident register retention, post-accident testing trigger logic, FMCSA accident reporting (no longer required to FMCSA directly for non-fatal accidents), insurance reporting timelines, and what to do after a CMV crash. Cite 49 CFR 390.5 + 390.15.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when FMCSA conducts an off-site investigation (less formal than CR). Covers the document-request approach and how to respond efficiently.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA's Crash Preventability Determination Program (CPDP) — how to dispute that a crash was non-preventable, eligible crash types, evidence requirements, how preventability findings affect SMS scoring + safety ratings, the difference between "preventability" and "fault," and the National Crash Preventability Program. Cite FMCSA CPDP guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to understand the FMCSA cargo securement standards. Covers § 393.100-§ 393.136 general rules, tiedown requirements, working load limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to respond to an FMCSA audit document request efficiently. Covers organization, file labeling, secure transmission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about US-Canada cross-border CMV operations — CVOR (Commercial Vehicle Operator's Registration), NSC (National Safety Code), Ontario / Quebec / BC specific rules, US carrier obtaining Canadian operating authority, FAST card for drivers, customs (CBSA), Health Canada hazmat, and how Transport Canada equivalents differ from US FMCSA. Reference USMCA + Transport Canada NSC 14.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for transporting steel coils. Covers § 393.120 specific rules, chain requirements, dunnage placement, and inspection procedures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage feature manifests for code traceability. Use when creating new features, updating existing features, checking feature health, or exploring the feature-to-code relationship. Activates for manifest validation, feature creation, changelog updates, and traceability queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafting and iterating sections of The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor (local identity) and Bonded Commons (local coordination), extending coordination across machines and administrative domains. Use when authoring a section, rewriting a section after a redteam/whitehat round, or composing a new chapter. NOT for marketing copy, NOT for the other two papers, NOT for production threat response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Principled action selection for autonomous agents using Expected Free Energy (EFE) under the Active Inference framework. Each candidate action is scored as G(n) = w_prag * (-E[p_n] * damping) + w_epist * (-Var[p_n] * novelty(n)), where agent beliefs are maintained as per-node Beta distributions and updated via Bayesian observation. Selection is a softmax over -gamma * G, making exploration an automatic consequence of uncertainty rather than a hardcoded epsilon. Precision weights w_prag and w_epist self-adapt via surprise history, shifting the agent between exploitation and exploration regimes without any manually tuned schedule.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan database migrations before executing them: risk assessment, dependency mapping, multi-service sequencing, rollback budgets, and stakeholder communication plans. Use when deciding HOW to migrate, not when writing the actual DDL. NOT for: writing migration SQL (use database-migration-manager), data ETL pipelines (use data-migration-specialist), query optimization, or ORM configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debugs recorded DAG lineage through historical inspection, deterministic decision replay when prerequisites hold, and clearly labeled counterfactual or live re-execution. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "inspect node state", "compare runs", or "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates versioned permission requests against a grant scope and records comparison evidence. Activate on 'validate permissions', 'permission check', 'inheritance validation', 'permission matrix', 'security validation'. NOT for runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer) or isolation management (use dag-isolation-manager).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate finite-DAG order objectives and construct reachability-chain or direct-edge path partitions with explicit proof boundaries. NOT for equating reachability chains with direct-edge paths without checking the chosen objective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose and safely admit immutable DAG revisions after failures, requirements, resource changes, or unresolved effects. NOT for mutating an executing graph in place or retrying an effect with unknown commit state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Send and receive transactional emails with Cloudflare Email Service (Email Sending + Email Routing). Use when building email sending (Workers binding or REST API), email routing, Agents SDK email handling, or integrating email into any app — Workers, Node.js, Python, Go, etc. Also use for email deliverability, SPF/DKIM/DMARC, wrangler email setup, MCP email tools, or when a coding agent needs to send emails. Even for simple requests like "add email to my Worker" — this skill has critical config details.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book. NOT for server-side rate limiting, bulkhead isolation, backpressure protocols, or database-specific retry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in color theory, palette harmony, and perceptual color science for computational photo composition. Specializes in earth-mover distance optimization, warm/cool alternation, diversity-aware palette selection, and hue-based photo sequencing. Activate on "color palette", "color harmony", "warm cool", "earth mover distance", "Wasserstein", "LAB space", "hue sorted", "palette matching". NOT for basic RGB manipulation (use standard image processing), single-photo color grading (use native-app-designer), UI color schemes (use vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer), or color blindness simulation (accessibility specialists).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and audits native-unit capacity reservation, serial admission, ambiguity holds, stop reserves, effect closure, and control-disjoint settlement handoff for consequential agent attempts. Use when scarce capacity must be conserved across retry, rework, resurrection, or compensation. NOT for scheduling work, choosing models, pricing unlike resources into one scalar, authorizing effects, grading work, paying workers, or asserting runtime containment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。