6,930 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when auditing UI code for interface-guideline compliance (accessibility, forms, animation, images, performance, UX copy) and/or validating a deployed page against Lighthouse 95+ targets. Produces evidence-based findings (file:line + Lighthouse JSON) and turns confirmed pendencies into Draft SPECs via write-specs. Do NOT use to design/build UI from scratch (use design) or to fix findings inline — fixes go through the SPEC pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Lingzao creator-content tools for Xiaohongshu/XHS, Douyin, and WeChat official-account public content. Lingzao supports XHS SEO, Xiaohongshu account analysis, benchmark account discovery, viral note breakdown, keyword research, one-stop content packages from keyword/link/image/inspiration material, title and cover optimization, hand-drawn route-map cards, city food maps, travel itinerary maps, life checklist maps, workflow manual maps, creator content workflow, note search, creator search, profile lookup, recent posts, deep profile copy/subtitle analysis, note/article detail, post comments, article stats, related articles, short-video copy extraction, and prompt-based creator image generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Ruff checks with optional scope and rule overrides, apply safe and unsafe autofixes iteratively, review each change, and resolve remaining findings with targeted edits or user decisions. Use when cleaning up Ruff lint findings across a Python codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compress review pressure into the right next action instead of more code by default. Classify findings, reject non-liabilities, and choose proof-only vs minimal-fix vs refactor-kernel, preventing one-patch-per-comment churn. Use after a code review — PR comments, reviewer suggestions, or audit findings — and especially when you are about to reflexively patch every comment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Save the latest learning as a numbered markdown file under ~/.claude/learnings and update the learnings index with title and tags. Use when the user says "save", asks to record a learning, or wants the current insight stored for later.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton mental model for someone who has never seen this repo — what "layer" means (two different things), the two-halves rule, the three app.config registries, team-scoped multi-tenancy, manifest-driven field types, the numbered invariants with the incidents behind them, and the known-weak points. Use when orienting in this codebase for the first time, when a question is shaped like "how does crouton work / why is it built this way / where does X live", when deciding whether a change belongs in a package or a generated layer, when confused by an extends chain or by croutonApps/croutonCollections/croutonLayoutBlocks, or before proposing any structural change. Trigger phrases: "what is a crouton layer", "package vs generated layer", "how does multi-tenancy work here", "why is there a stub component", "where do field types come from", "what invariants must hold".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarially probe this monorepo for security flaws at the right depth. Steers the red-team subagent — picks quick/standard/deep from the request, spawns it (fanning out for a wide deep sweep), collates findings into a dated report, and files security/sec:* issues for confirmed high/critical findings. Use when asked to "red-team", "try to hack this", "find security holes", "pentest this package/app", or as the brain behind the CI + daily security runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
exact-13 staging planを独立評価したいとき、4条件とdigestに束縛したplan-findings.jsonを生成したいときに使う。
生成済みプロンプトを C1-C4 と 4 パスで評価したいとき、context:fork で独立評価結果 findings.json を取得したいときに使う。
生成済み plan を4条件と決定論ゲートで評価したいとき、context:fork で独立評価結果 plan-findings.json を取得したいときに使う。
Cloudflare Workersのコードを本番運用品質のベストプラクティスに照らして作成・レビューする。新しいWorkerの実装、Workerコードのレビュー、wrangler.jsoncの設定、streaming・floating promises・global state・secrets・bindings・observabilityなどのanti-pattern確認で使用する。事前学習の記憶よりCloudflare公式ドキュメントからの取得を優先する。
36章 PKG-002〜008 / PKG-014 sub-check を実行したいとき、plugin package の静的検査結果を findings JSON で得たいときに使う。
Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Communication Services CallingServer (legacy) Java SDK. Note - This SDK is deprecated. Use azure-communication-callautomation instead for new projects. Only use this skill when maintaining legacy code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure OpenAI SDK for .NET. Client library for Azure OpenAI and OpenAI services. Use for chat completions, embeddings, image generation, audio transcription, and assistants. Triggers: "Azure OpenAI", "AzureOpenAIClient", "ChatClient", "chat completions .NET", "GPT-4", "embeddings", "DALL-E", "Whis...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure App Configuration SDK for Python. Use for centralized configuration management, feature flags, and dynamic settings. Triggers: "azure-appconfiguration", "AzureAppConfigurationClient", "feature flags", "configuration", "key-value settings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spectral vector search using graph Laplacian eigenstructure. Use when cosine/L2 similarity misses latent structure in your embeddings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate AI music and songs with Diffrythm, Tencent Song Generation via inference.sh CLI. Models: Diffrythm (fast song generation), Tencent Song Generation (full songs with vocals). Capabilities: text-to-music, song generation, instrumental, lyrics to song, soundtrack creation. Use for: ba...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate AWS GuardDuty threat detection findings processing using EventBridge and Lambda to enable real-time incident response, automatic quarantine of compromised resources, and security notification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate spectrograms and feature-panel visualizations from audio with the songsee CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。