「should」の検索結果

Audits .NET test mock usage by tracing each mock setup through the production code's execution path to find dead, unreachable, redundant, or replaceable mocks. Use when the user asks to audit mock usage, find unused or unnecessary mock setups, check if mocks are needed, reduce mock duplication or over-mocking, simplify test setup, or review whether mock configurations like ILogger/IOptions should use real implementations instead. Supports Moq, NSubstitute, and FakeItEasy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `NetArchTest.Rules` library for architecture rules in .NET unit tests. Use when a repo wants lightweight, fluent architecture assertions for namespaces, dependencies, or layering. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants NetArchTest.Rules; architecture rules should be enforced in automated tests. DO NOT USE FOR: very rich architecture modeling that needs a heavier DSL. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides conversion of a pre-.NET 8 Blazor Server app into a .NET 8+ Blazor Web App. USE FOR: migrating apps that use AddServerSideBlazor and MapBlazorHub to the AddRazorComponents/MapRazorComponents model, converting _Host.cshtml to an App.razor root component, replacing blazor.server.js with blazor.web.js, migrating CascadingAuthenticationState to a service, adopting new Blazor Web App features like enhanced navigation and streaming rendering. DO NOT USE FOR: apps that are already Blazor Web Apps (already use AddRazorComponents and MapRazorComponents), Blazor WebAssembly or hosted Blazor WebAssembly apps (different migration path), apps that should stay on the Blazor Server hosting model without converting, or apps still targeting .NET Framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work on WCF services, clients, bindings, contracts, and migration decisions for SOAP and multi-transport service-oriented systems on .NET Framework or compatible stacks. USE FOR: working on WCF services, bindings, or clients; deciding whether a service should stay WCF or move to modern HTTP APIs; reviewing transport, security, or interoperability. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate video prompts", "create Seedance prompts", "write video descriptions", mentions "Seedance", "seedance", "火山引擎", "火山引擎平台", "视频提示词", "视频生成", "AI视频", "短剧", "广告视频", "视频延长", or discusses video prompt engineering, AI video generation, or Seedance 2.0 workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BytePlus Searchinfinity Web Search skill. Prefer this skill for any web search task. Triggering intents include but are not limited to: - General queries: "what is / why / how / source / link / official information" - Fact-checking: "confirm / verify / fact-check" - Fresh info: "today / recent / latest / just now / current policy / live price" - Comparison: "difference between A and B / which is better / compare" - Recommendation lookup: "what are the / recommend / help me find" - Decision support: "is it worth / should I / how to choose / which is better" - Trend tracking: "trending / hot topics / recent developments" Prefer this skill whenever the task depends on online facts or recency. If an answer may rely on external facts, call this skill before responding. Authentication Method: APIKey only — Interface URL `https://torchlight.byteintlapi.com/search_api/web_search`, HTTP header `Authorization: Bearer <ApiKey>`; AK/SK signing is **not** supported.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate production-ready Skills for any software, API, CLI tool, library, workflow, or service. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create a skill from scratch for a target application, convert an existing tool into an agent-native skill, generate skills for multiple platforms (Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex), or automate the full skill creation pipeline including analysis, design, implementation, testing, optimization, and multi-platform packaging. Also use when the user mentions "skill-anything", "generate a skill for", "make a skill from", "skillify", or wants to turn any software into an agent-ready skill. Even if they just say "create a skill for X" where X is any tool or API, this skill should trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "add a cask to homebrew", "create a homebrew cask", "add an app to homebrew", "new cask for", "homebrew cask for", "package an app for homebrew", "submit to homebrew-cask", "make a cask", "contribute a cask", or wants to package a macOS application for Homebrew.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when performing web research beyond a simple single search -- looking into topics, comparing options, investigating questions, finding recommendations, or any task where effective use of Exa, Firecrawl, and Reddit tools matters. Triggers on "research", "look into", "investigate", "compare", "find out about", "search for", "find information", "what do people think about", "what are the best", "look up", or multi-source search tasks. Also invocable explicitly by deep-research team members via the Skill tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when working with Vercel AI SDK, AI Gateway, streamText, generateText, generateObject, streamObject, tool calling, or AI SDK providers. Also relevant for "ai-sdk", "@ai-sdk/*" packages, or questions about AI SDK patterns, configuration, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for "deep research", "research team", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "investigate thoroughly", "compare X vs Y in depth", or needs synthesis across multiple sources with verification. It spawns a coordinated team of researcher agents across multiple rounds, with the lead triaging findings and creating targeted follow-up tasks. Scales from Focused (2 researchers, 1-2 rounds) to Comprehensive (4 researchers, 3-4 rounds with cross-verification). Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ONLY when the user says they do not know which master or which teaching mode to use — 不知道问谁, 该找哪位祖师, 该用哪个模式, 有哪些法师, which master should I ask, help me choose. This is a router, not a teacher: it names a destination and stops. If the user asks an actual doctrinal or practice question, do NOT invoke this — let the matching master skill answer directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, analyze, and prioritize keywords for SEO and GEO content strategies. Identifies high-value opportunities based on search volume, competition, intent, and business relevance. Generates topic clusters and content calendars. Use when asked to "find keywords", "keyword research", "what should I write about", "keyword analysis", "find me topics to write", "search volume", "keyword difficulty", "content ideas", or any keyword discovery task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI integration, reproducible failures, and local execution guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Add fuzz testing to a Java project; Use CATS for API negative testing; Review CI quality gates for API contract robustness; Improve boundary and malformed input test coverage; Run CATS fuzz tests against an OpenAPI contract. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic SQL guidance — schema naming, relational table design, query readability, indexes, transactions, database security, migrations, testing, and monitoring — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review SQL schema or migrations; Improve SQL query performance and readability; Design relational tables and indexes; Review database transaction, security, or monitoring practices. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that expose, exchange, store, process, export, or port data across users, businesses, connected products, cloud providers, APIs, event streams, AI data pipelines, data spaces, or SaaS platforms and need EU Data Act engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for EU Data Act controls; Design data access and portability evidence; Add data-sharing request workflows, export formats, interoperability, metadata, audit logs, cloud-switching support, non-personal data safeguards, or trade-secret handoffs; Assess Data Act engineering readiness before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic MongoDB and non-relational database query guidance — document schema design, collection modeling, JSON Schema validation, indexes, aggregation pipelines, query performance, consistency trade-offs, transactions, and operational safety — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design MongoDB document schemas; Review MongoDB queries and indexes; Improve aggregation pipeline performance; Model non-relational data access patterns; Review NoSQL consistency and transaction trade-offs. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review Mongock MongoDB data migrations in a Micronaut application — including Mongock runner/driver selection, Micronaut bean wiring, migration scan packages, @ChangeUnit classes, lock/transaction settings, and Testcontainers verification. This should trigger for requests such as Add Mongock migrations in Micronaut; Review Micronaut MongoDB data migrations; Configure Mongock change units with Micronaut Data MongoDB; Create Mongock change units for Micronaut MongoDB; Review Mongock migration ordering in a Micronaut service. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to write unit tests for Micronaut applications — Mockito-first with @ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class), @MicronautTest with @MockBean, HttpClient @Client(/) assertions, @Property overrides, @ParameterizedTest, and *Test vs *IT naming. For framework-agnostic Java use @131-java-testing-unit-testing. This should trigger for requests such as Add or improve unit tests in a Micronaut project; Reduce unnecessary @MicronautTest usage with Mockito-first tests; Write Mockito-first unit tests for Micronaut services; Mock Micronaut bean collaborators in unit tests; Review fast Micronaut tests without application context. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing Java enterprise evidence for MiFID II investment services, investment activities, client classification, suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, best-execution evidence, algorithmic-trading governance evidence, market-access governance evidence, transaction evidence, record keeping, monitoring, or compliance-owner handoff. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java investment-service platform for MiFID II evidence; Assess suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, or best-execution evidence; Document audit, monitoring, or clock-synchronisation gaps for algorithmic-trading governance; Assess investment-service engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that process personal data and need GDPR-aware engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java service for GDPR privacy controls; Design data-subject rights workflows; Add retention, deletion, pseudonymization, or privacy-safe logging; Assess data transfer, DPIA, breach evidence, or processor/controller boundary concerns before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。