1.6万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
SOP for the automated refinement loop (/refine) workflow. Trigger when: - Exhaustively auditing and optimizing pre-existing codebase artifacts. - Applying iterative contraction mapping to reduce code entropy. - Prompt contains: /refine, refinement loop, contraction mapping, fixed-point sweep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protocol for auditing API surface coherence and type safety. Trigger when: - Evaluating API designs, interface type safety, or design elegance. - Prompt contains: /api-audit, API surface, API coherence, type safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines and strategies for constructing meaningful test suites, property-based tests, metamorphic relations, and fuzzing harnesses. Trigger when: - Designing verification bounds, writing tests, creating test invariants, or implementing validation gates. - Prompt contains: testing, test design, property-based testing, PBT, metamorphic testing, fuzzing, integration tests, E2E.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mathematical foundations, logical structures, and formal verification guidance. Trigger when: - Designing protocol contracts, formal specifications, verifying state spaces, or using proof assistants. - Tasks involve: TLA+, Alloy, Lean, Coq, model checkers, invariants, temporal logic. - Prompt contains keywords: formal verification, alloy, tla+, lean, coq, invariant, state machine, model checker, liveness, safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic programming style, patterns, and conventions for Rust development. Trigger when: - Writing, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging Rust code. - Files matching the pattern **/*.rs (including Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock) are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: cargo build, cargo clippy, cargo test, cargo check, rustc. - Prompt contains keywords: rust, cargo, clippy, borrow checker, lifetime, struct, enum, impl, Option, Result, match, unwrap, unsafe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a proven POC into a real, crouton-native, documented package(s) + a consuming app — the deliberate "step back and rebuild" checkpoint. SPEC-DRIVEN — the POC discovers a behaviour spec (captured at each sign-off), graduation freezes it as authoritative, the app is rebuilt the crouton way to satisfy it, and nothing is done until it's checked + signed off against two gates (experience + crouton-conformance). Use when a `pocs/*` app is proven and "done", or asked to "graduate this poc", "make it a real app", "extract the package".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Symptom → root-cause lookup table for nuxt-crouton's recurring failure modes — exact error strings mapped to their known cause, fix, and evidence issue. Use when you hit an error you don't recognize in this repo, before debugging from first principles. Trigger phrases and symptoms: "Cannot resolve entry module .nuxt/hub/db/schema.entry.ts", "Could not load '@fyit/crouton'", "No migrations present", "No schema files found", "$setup.t is not a function", "does not provide an export named 'Map'", "no such table: translations_ui", "collection pages 500 in production", "the build was green but the app is broken", "is this a known issue?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton-conformance gate — the SECOND acceptance axis of graduation (the first is the experience side-by-side, /graduate stage C1). Checks a graduated app is a REAL crouton app — CLI-scaffolded, real collections, consumes the correct packages without reinventing them — by composing the existing probes (frontend-review, a11y, e2e-smoke, typecheck) plus crouton-structural checks, then renders a required, signed-off checklist on the graduation PR. Use at /graduate stage C2, or when asked "is this app crouton-native", "run the conformance gate", "check graduation conformance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy a crouton app to Cloudflare Workers PRODUCTION (<app>.friendlyinter.net). A deliberate, human-initiated action — separate from the default staging /deploy skill. Use ONLY when explicitly asked to ship/release to production. Never run as part of routine work or an automated flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data Scientist role within the AID methodology. Activate when working on: EDA, feasibility assessment, experiment planning, ML architecture, model development & validation, or production deployment & monitoring. Stack-agnostic — ask the user for their stack at the start of any new project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered design review for Figma components with weighted dual-scoring system. Evaluates Style Guide Implementation (70%) and LLM Metadata Accessibility (30%). For export, hands off to atomic-design skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, extend, or fix Eloquent business models and their state transitions. Use when moving business rules out of controllers or Actions, or explicitly migrating a model into a DDD capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when scheduling and executing review sessions at scientifically-calibrated expanding intervals for long-term retention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when simulating a technical interview to build confidence, expose reasoning gaps, and train structured communication under pressure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a learner has surface understanding and needs to explore mechanism, tradeoffs, edge cases, and production implications at depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining a technical concept and adapting depth, pacing, and examples to the learner's readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, verify, transfer, and resume compact project handoff packets for long-running Codex work. Use after a second observed automatic context compaction, immediately after a third compaction, when attention or constraints degrade, a major phase ends, the user asks to move work into a fresh task, work must pause, or an existing handoff needs to be imported. Do not interrupt after the first normal compaction. Always ask before creating a new task, transfer the global roadmap only after explicit consent, preserve the old task title when available, then require the fresh task to ask what work matters most. Preserve objectives, constraints, decisions, evidence, approval boundaries, workspace state, validation, and risks without treating an old summary as current truth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an evidence-backed working model of an existing codebase. Use when you must orient in a large or unfamiliar repository; explain architecture or a subsystem; trace a request, runtime, control, or data flow for a concrete question or bug; analyze a branch, commit, diff, or pull request for behavioral impact and blast radius; or assess AI-generated or changed code against requirements, contracts, invariants, tests, and runtime evidence. Default to read-only investigation. Do not trigger only because a coding task touches an existing repository; use when understanding or verification is the requested outcome or a substantial prerequisite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze folders of Markdown/text research notes, Obsidian vaults, paper cards, invention notes, or memory exports as a practical knowledge map. Use when asked to find center topics, noisy or low-signal notes, possible contamination, overgrown topic groups, orphan notes, cleanup actions, or a useful public knowledge-hygiene workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight multi-agent research orchestration using one coordinator, three domain leads, and three lightweight research agents. Use for medium-size research, market scans, competitor comparisons, prior-art style exploration, report planning, and any task that benefits from parallel domain decomposition without running a full high-cost research lab.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for DESIGN.md visual identity contracts; author, scaffold, lint, diff, and export design contracts with the upstream spec and CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a project has 50+ files, missing context, or explicit $codex-genome request; generates multi-layer project context to reduce hallucination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。