「does」の検索結果

Learns the words a user habitually writes to their coding agent that make its answers worse ("be 100% sure", "don't assume", "full review", "are you sure?", "all fine, right?"), from what they actually typed in their recent Claude Code sessions. Shows what each one does, what went wrong after it, and what to say instead, then writes the habit words block that maps each word to the checks it should trigger, so the checks run without the words. Use when asked to learn, read, refresh or review the user's habit words or prompts, "which of my words make you worse", from setup-first-pass's profile step, or when the start-of-session check says the habit words are due.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up, checks or changes the optional Jev judge, the TypeSafe decision model that ship-check asks about review findings (is this real harm, is a small one worth fixing now, what proof does a small fix need). Shows whether it is on for each repo, which key it uses, switches it on or off, and sends one test request. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix routine that fixes the whole class of bug, not just the reported instance. Use for any bug report, failing production behaviour, monitoring alert, audit finding or review finding that does real harm (a smaller review finding goes on the item's list, as ship-check says), and whenever the same kind of bug has been seen before. Reproduces it with a failing test, names the failure class, searches the task's scope for the same pattern (the whole codebase when the user's own prompt asks for the fix, not when it is picked from a task's list), fixes or records every hit, and adds the rule, invariant, helper or check that stops it coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to obtain, download, or fetch a paper's PDF — given a DOI, an arXiv id, a paper title, a citation, or a list of DOIs. Trigger on phrases like "download this paper", "find the PDF for [DOI]", "grab me the [Nature/bioRxiv/arXiv] paper on X", "get the open-access version", "I need this article", or any bulk/batch paper download request, even when the user doesn't explicitly say "PDF" or "DOI". Resolves via Unpaywall → Semantic Scholar → arXiv → PubMed Central → bioRxiv/medRxiv → publisher direct (institutional opt-in) → Sci-Hub mirrors as last-resort fallback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch Bilibili (哔哩哔哩) video comments for UP主 self-analysis. Use when the user asks to collect, download, export, or analyze comments on a Bilibili video (BV号 / URL / UID). Produces JSONL + summary.json suitable for further Claude Code analysis (sentiment, keywords, audience trends). Read-only; does not post/edit/delete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于查询、检索、核验、下载、导出、批量采集中国官方法律法规、规章、条约和具体法条。Use this skill aggressively when the user asks to 查法律、查法规、查条例、查规章、查条约、查法条、查第几条、找法律依据、引用法律依据、核验现行有效、判断是否废止/已修改/尚未生效、下载法规全文、导出法规目录、批量下载法规文件、按关键词检索具体法条、展开法条分析，或在中国法律咨询、案例分析、合规审查、合同审查、劳动争议、行政法分析、公司合规、数据合规、政策研究中需要调用、核验或引用中国现行有效法律法规原文作为依据。Trigger also when phrases such as 依法、依规、依照法律规定、法律法规 imply a need to verify specific statutory authority or article-level text. Covers 国家法律法规数据库 (flk.npc.gov.cn), 国家规章库 (gov.cn), 外交条约库 (treaty.mfa.gov.cn), 国务院政策文件库 (sousuo.www.gov.cn), 司法部行政法规库 (xzfg.moj.gov.cn), 党内法规库 (12371.cn), 国防部法规文库 (mod.gov.cn), 税务法规库 (fgk.chinatax.gov.cn), 生态环境部法规规章 (mee.gov.cn), and 最高人民法院发布栏目 (court.gov.cn). Supports 标题/正文检索, 精确/模糊检索, 时效性过滤, 分类过滤, 分页, 排序, 单篇下载, 批量下载, 法条级抽取, 地区/制定机关分类, and browser fallback. Trigger when the answer may depend on current effective Chinese statutes, regulations, rules, treaties, article text, official document status, or official source attribution. Do not use for purely general legal theory, generic writing, or legal reasoning that does not require retrieving or verifying official Chinese legal documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to build or think through a strategy via guided conversation — for a company, product, team, career, or initiative. Triggers on "help me figure out our direction", "what should we focus on", strategic planning, competitive positioning, go-to-market strategy. Also catches indirect requests like prioritization struggles or "we have too many priorities". Does NOT review existing strategy documents (use strategy-review) or brainstorm project features (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, critiquing, or stress-testing an existing strategy document. Evaluates seven dimensions — diagnosis quality, guiding policy strength, action coherence, assumption exposure, falsifiability — with optional 7S, Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri lenses. Triggers on: review my strategy, poke holes in this plan, what's weak here, strategy audit, red team this. Does NOT build strategy (use strategy-interview) or brainstorm project ideas (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want to generate Architecture Decision Records from this session. Triggers on "write ADRs", "document our decisions", "create decision records", "record the choices we made". Also useful after design discussions where decisions were reached but not documented. Does NOT extract decisions alone (use adr-decision-extraction) or provide MADR template (use adr-writing). Orchestrates the full workflow: subagent extraction, user confirmation, parallel generation, and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RIPDPI's own Compose conventions: ViewModel pattern, Route/Screen split, DataStore->StateFlow, RipDpiThemeTokens. Use for how this app does Compose, not generic Compose API questions (see compose).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A helpful skill that does many things

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for insurance-claims operations with Stedi whenever the user asks to submit claims, validate claim payloads, check claim status, retrieve/interpret 277CA or 835 responses, troubleshoot payer/provider enrollment requirements, or build deterministic claims workflows. Trigger this skill even if the user does not say "Stedi" explicitly but mentions 837/835/277CA/ERA, payer IDs, claim rejection codes, claim resubmission, COB, or healthcare clearinghouse automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates Warren Buffett's complete investment thinking system. The following scenarios must trigger it: analyzing any stock or company, evaluating investment opportunities, interpreting financial reports/annual reports/shareholder letters, assessing business moats or competitive advantages, evaluating management quality and integrity, making buy/hold/sell decisions, understanding core value investing concepts (compounding/intrinsic value/margin of safety/circle of competence/Mr. Market), analyzing any industry (insurance/banking/consumer/media/energy/railroads/technology), handling capital allocation/buybacks/dividends questions, assessing market sentiment and macro risks, exploring when to sell, analyzing institutional imperative or management behavior. Even if the user does not mention "Buffett," proactively trigger whenever the topic involves investment analysis, business quality assessment, or investment decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate merkle root mismatch alerts between relayer and validators. Use when alerts mention "merkle root mismatch", "checkpoint root does not match canonical root", or when asked to debug relayer merkle tree issues for a chain. This skill only investigates - use /fix-merkle-root-mismatch to apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce board financial package — monthly or quarterly financial update with P&L, cash position, key metrics, and variance vs plan. Use when asked to "prepare board materials", "write the financial section of the board deck", or "what metrics does the board care about".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。