4,192 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implement reactive state with GetX controllers, bindings, and observables in Flutter. Use when managing app state with GetxController, Obx, GetBuilder, or dependency lifecycle—not unit tests for existing controllers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement String Catalogs, L10n workflows, and asset management for iOS. Use when adding multi-language support using iOS String Catalogs or L10n workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce design token usage in SwiftUI apps using iOS Human Interface Guidelines. Use when implementing design tokens, colors, or typography in SwiftUI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement reactive state management using Riverpod 3.x with code generation in Flutter. Use when defining providers, building AsyncNotifiers, or overriding providers in tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write safe concurrent Go code with goroutines, channels, and context. Use when implementing concurrency with goroutines, channels, or context in Go.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dart static analysis, linting, formatting, and code-generation standards. Use only for analysis_options.yaml, build_runner, dart format, DCM, lefthook, or analyze/format CI failures; defer Dart language, null-safety, Flutter tests, and generic CI questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) audit checklist for AI applications, agent tools, RAG pipelines, and prompt construction. Use when performing any security review touching LLM client code, prompt templates, agent tools, or vector stores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply motion design principles for mobile apps covering timing curves, transitions, gestures, and performance-conscious animations. Use when implementing screen transitions, gesture-driven interactions, shared-element animations, or optimizing animation frame rates on iOS, Android, or Flutter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce universal mobile UX principles for touch-first interfaces including touch targets, safe areas, and mobile-specific interaction patterns. Use when building mobile screens, handling touch interactions, or validating safe area compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer the requesting operator's technical fluency from message content (never ask directly) and adapt register — business, hybrid, or technical — across SDLC workflow output. Use when starting sdlc, brainstorm-feature, plan-feature, verify-work, publish-notes, or session-report, or whenever a request's phrasing signals a non-technical or cross-stack operator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OWASP Top 10 audit checklists for Web Applications (2021), APIs (2023), and Mobile (2024). Use when performing any security review, PR review, or codebase audit touching web, mobile, or API code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Right-size, ground, and gate SDLC decisions with SNC-sized depth, said-vs-assumed write-back, an evidence ledger, honest option cards, recorded approval, and self-review. Use when running brainstorm-feature, plan-feature, design-solution, or system-design-session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-cutting standards for error design, response shapes, error codes, and boundary placement across API, domain, and infrastructure layers. Use when defining error hierarchies, wrapping exceptions, building standardized error responses, or placing error boundaries in layered architectures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and reviews detections from telemetry prerequisites, correlation logic, Sigma metadata, severity, status, and benign cases. Use for detection rules, Sigma review, analytic coverage, or tuning; not generic logging advice or live deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Captures redacted, provenance-aware cybersecurity observations with shared status fields, independent ground truth, and honest limitations. Use when recording exercise evidence, findings, validation results, or security-review handoffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls authorized cybersecurity exercises through inject scheduling, safety gates, stop and restart decisions, communications, and synthetic-data boundaries. Use when serving as exercise control or white-team coordinator, not as compliance assessor or whitehat operator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NIST SP 800-61r3-aligned incident triage that preserves evidence, separates analysis from authorization, and records status. Use for incident intake, severity assessment, containment readiness, or evidence preservation; not generic debugging or unscoped response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dart code quality conventions: naming, const/final/var hierarchy, single quotes, trailing commas, collection idioms, tear-offs, and import organization. Use only for Dart style-focused changes or reviews; never activate for configuration-only lint setup, unrelated feature work, or widget tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce universal standards for high-performance development. Use when profiling bottlenecks, reducing latency, fixing memory leaks, improving throughput, or optimizing algorithm complexity in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce structured JSON logging, OpenTelemetry distributed tracing, and RED metrics across backend services. Use when adding request correlation, setting up tracing spans, defining SLO burn-rate alerts, or instrumenting middleware.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardize dynamic application security testing for backend APIs, frontend web apps, and mobile clients. Covers ZAP, Nuclei, Nikto, sqlmap, ffuf, browser automation, mobile proxy interception, and AI-driven curl probes. Use when advising on or running dynamic security scans on local/staging environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PTES-aligned penetration testing methodology for backend, frontend, and mobile. Provides attack taxonomy, exploit techniques per vulnerability class, and platform-specific test matrices. Use when executing pentest workflow, planning security assessments, mapping attack surfaces, or building threat models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。