「complete」の検索結果

Check agent configuration coverage across hierarchy levels and phases. Use to ensure complete agent system coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work autonomously without waiting for hand-holding — complete tasks end-to-end without asking for permission at every step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when recovery planning requires verification that backups are restorable, complete, and safe to trust before an incident or recovery event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically remove malware, backdoors, and attacker persistence mechanisms from infected systems while ensuring complete eradication and preventing re-infection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redistricting analysis in R using the redistverse ecosystem. Use whenever the user is working with redist, redistmetrics, ggredist, geomander, adj, alarmdata, PL94171, censable, easycensus, tinytiger, baf, rict, or redistio. Covers the complete pipeline: Census and spatial data loading, adjacency graph construction, SMC/MCMC simulation, constraints (population balance, county splits, VRA compliance), convergence diagnostics, plan metrics (compactness, partisan fairness, splits), visualization, summary tables, and interactive plan drawing. Invoke whenever the user mentions redistricting, gerrymandering, district plans, simulation ensembles, or any redistverse package by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

houtu-dependencies enterprise-grade Spring Cloud microservice foundational framework complete usage guide. GroupId is io.github.lujiafa, covering unified response, exception handling, parameter parsing, session authentication, permission control, signature verification, anti-replay, distributed lock, rate limiting, database field encryption, config decryption, access logging, canary routing, weighted load balancing, Feign enhancement, Sentinel circuit breaking, service discovery, Swagger documentation, crypto utilities, HTTP client, monitoring metrics, and other enterprise-grade capabilities. When the project build file (pom.xml or build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) contains io.github.lujiafa or houtu-related dependencies, or when the user mentions houtu or houtu-dependencies, this Skill must be read and code must be generated strictly following framework conventions. Even if the user is simply doing regular Spring Boot development (e.g., writing Controller, Service, Feign), as long as the project includes houtu, the houtu approach must be used instead of native Spring. When the user explicitly wants to use the houtu framework and the project has not yet included it, proactively add the BOM and required Starters; when the project already includes it, proactively identify and import required module dependencies based on business scenarios during coding, naturally integrating framework capabilities to enhance business services based on business semantics, rather than waiting for the user to specify each one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Design consultation: understands your product, researches the landscape, proposes a complete design system (aesthetic, typography, color, layout, spacing, motion), and generates font+color preview. (gstack)".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and draft multi-email sequences with full copy, timing, branching logic, exit conditions, and performance benchmarks. Use when building onboarding, lead nurture, re-engagement, win-back, or product launch flows, when you need a complete drip campaign with A/B test suggestions, or when mapping a sequence end-to-end with a flow diagram.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply contract theory to design incentive-compatible agreements under moral hazard and adverse selection. Use this skill when the user needs to structure principal-agent contracts, evaluate compensation schemes, or analyze incomplete contract problems where parties cannot specify all contingencies ex ante.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Enterprise risk management (ERM) framework layer — integrates COSO ERM 2017 (five components, 20 principles), ISO 31000, three-lines model, risk appetite, risk heatmap, and key risk indicators (KRI) into a complete governance playbook covering structure through culture. Use for ERM implementation, risk-system build, risk mapping, risk-appetite statement drafting, three-lines setup, CRO role design, or Taiwan FSC corporate-governance evaluation response. Triggers: 『ERM 導入』『風險管理框架』『COSO』『風險地圖』『風險胃納』『KRI』『CRO 職責』『三道防線』『風險委員會』『ISO 31000』『風險熱圖』『風險治理』. For 師大／政大／陽交 EMBA risk-management/governance/audit cases. Complements Asgard `algo-risk-*` (Altman Z, Benford, credit, VaR) with the framework/governance layer. 獨董挑選/董事會組成/IPO 治理: use `biz-corporate-governance`.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate code quality, test coverage, performance, and security. Use when verifying implemented features meet all standards and requirements before marking complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch reviews to external companion AIs (Codex, Gemini, Claude) for an independent second opinion on code changes, PR readiness, doc completeness, architecture, or implementation status. Use when you want a fresh-eyes review beyond Claude-native. Trigger on "get a second opinion", "companion review", "review my changes", "review the PR". For Claude-only quality checks use /code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely merge GitHub pull requests using comprehensive pre-merge validation. Use this skill when the user asks to merge a PR, complete a PR workflow, or check if a PR is ready to merge. Validates CI/CD status, reviews, and conflicts before merging with the appropriate strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate user stories — INVEST scoring, story-to-test coverage mapping, PRP completeness, and development-readiness assessment. Use after writing stories and before starting implementation. Trigger on "validate the stories", "are these stories ready", "INVEST check", "story coverage", "is this ready to build".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-session ritual — close finished beads, file new ones for remaining work, run verify, commit in logical groupings, push. Work is not complete until git push succeeds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Forge's canonical verification chain (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use before claiming any task complete or opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-session ritual. Close finished beads, file new ones for remaining work, run verify, commit in logical groupings, push. Work is not complete until git push succeeds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the full Forge verification suite (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use this before claiming any task complete or before opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a hallucination check on machine_readable sections by verifying every element traces back to the original legal text. Use this skill proactively when: machine_readable sections have been generated or modified, after /law-generate completes, when reviewing corpus YAML files for legal accuracy, or when user mentions "validate", "verify", or "hallucination check" for law YAML files. Activate automatically after editing machine_readable sections in corpus regulation YAML files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation). Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preserve an approved specification through a complete implementation plan and execution. Use for major refactors, migrations, or multi-session work when a confirmed spec is authoritative; keep scope and order changes explicit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for hands-on repository work when a quiet, risk-scaled engineering method can improve design, execution strategy, implementation, material incorporation, debugging, review, delegation, workspace lifecycle, or verification. Keep clear local changes direct, preserve the complete requested outcome, and add method only where risk or uncertainty justifies it. Do not use for general technical explanations, simple file lookup, casual discussion, or non-engineering writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。