「fea」の検索結果

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'switch from competitor,' or 'comparison content.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, running, or learning from chaos engineering experiments. Triggers on "chaos experiment", "fault injection", "gameday", "resilience test", "blast radius", "steady state", "abort criteria", "Chaos Toolkit", "Chaos Mesh", "Litmus", "Gremlin", "AWS FIS", or any deliberate failure-injection question. Ships experiment designer, blast-radius calculator, and postmortem generator (all stdlib Python), 4 references on chaos principles + experiment design + attack taxonomy + tooling landscape, and a /chaos-experiment slash command. Composes with feature-flags-architect (kill switches as abort triggers) and kubernetes-operator (common chaos targets).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ML engineering skill for productionizing models, building MLOps pipelines, and integrating LLMs. Covers model deployment, feature stores, drift monitoring, RAG systems, and cost optimization. Use when the user asks about deploying ML models to production, setting up MLOps infrastructure (MLflow, Kubeflow, Kubernetes, Docker), monitoring model performance or drift, building RAG pipelines, or integrating LLM APIs with retry logic and cost controls. Focused on production and operational concerns rather than model research or initial training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:cpo-review <plan> — JTBD-driven interrogation of product roadmap, PMF signal, and portfolio focus. Use when committing a quarter's roadmap, deciding whether to kill a feature, or claiming PMF without a retention curve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring. Use when shipping an AI feature without an eval set, choosing between API, fine-tune, and self-hosted, or classifying a use case under the EU AI Act.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. Use when launching features that handle customer data, before a SOC 2 / ISO audit, or after any incident or near-miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn Notion specs into implementation plans, tasks, and progress tracking; use when implementing PRDs/feature specs and creating Notion plans + tasks from them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull latest origin/main into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when Codex needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user-facing release notes from tickets, PRDs, or changelogs. Creates clear, engaging summaries organized by category (new features, improvements, fixes). Use when writing release notes, creating changelogs, announcing product updates, or summarizing what shipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step actions, and expected outcomes. Use when writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance tests, or preparing for feature validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context. Use when writing structured backlog items, breaking features into work items, or using the WWA format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brainstorm product ideas for an existing product using multi-perspective ideation from PM, Designer, and Engineer viewpoints. Use when generating new feature ideas, brainstorming solutions for an identified opportunity, or ideating with a product trio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create user stories following the 3 C's (Card, Conversation, Confirmation) and INVEST criteria with descriptions, design links, and acceptance criteria. Use when writing user stories, breaking down features into backlog items, or defining acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a lean, decision-ready Product Requirements Document with an 8-section template: summary, contacts, background, objective, market segments, value propositions (6-part JTBD template), solution, and release. Lean by default (about one to two pages), with a fuller spec on request. Use when writing a PRD, documenting product requirements, preparing a feature spec, or reviewing an existing PRD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create sales-ready competitive battlecards comparing your product against a specific competitor — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win/loss patterns. Use when preparing sales teams, creating competitive materials, or responding to 'why not competitor X?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the polish team — performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, qa-tester — to optimize and harden a feature or area.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map test coverage to GDD critical paths, find fixed bugs lacking regression tests, flag drift from new features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer how something should work, feel, or read. Use when committing the wrong answer would be expensive to unravel and a cheap sketch cannot settle it. Not a rough visual probe during brainstorming, not for deciding what to build, not polishing a feature that already works, not implementing the real thing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and review content for the OpenSEO website (web/), including blog posts, guides, feature pages, FAQs. Makes sure each page delivers real value to its target reader. Use whenever adding or editing user-facing prose in web/content or web/src.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough bug report, feature request, support note, or pull request into a short, plain-language issue focused on the problem and desired behavior. Use when a contributor asks to simplify an issue, explain what a PR is for, create the corresponding issue for a PR, remove implementation detail from a report, or invokes /simple-issue-description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。