「from」の検索結果

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical incident-response runbook for a suspected or confirmed ComfyUI / GPU-daemon compromise. Triage, scope, contain, forensic collection, weight-integrity verification, rebuild from clean snapshot, postmortem. NOT for hygiene scans on a healthy box (use supply-chain-defense-for-ml-extensions), and NOT for runtime hardening of a fresh deployment (use gpu-hosted-asset-hardening).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans migrations from Zscaler ZIA/ZPA, Palo Alto, legacy VPN, SWG, or SASE stacks to Cloudflare One. Use for migration assessments, policy mapping, rollout plans, and parity/gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Epistemic logic for multi-agent perceptual systems — Kripke models, vision sets, public announcement as coordination primitive, and satisfiability-as-reconfiguration applied to agents with limited observability. From Charrier, Ouchet, Schwarzentruber's "Big Brother Logic" demonstration paper (ENS Rennes / IRISA).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Cloudflare platform skill covering Workers, Pages, storage (KV, D1, R2), AI (Workers AI, Vectorize, Agents SDK), feature flags (Flagship), networking (Tunnel, Spectrum), security (WAF, DDoS), and infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Pulumi). Use for any Cloudflare development task. Biases towards retrieval from Cloudflare docs over pre-trained knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Critical Decision Method (CDM) interviews to elicit expert reasoning strategies (L3 knowledge) from practitioners about specific challenging past incidents. Use when capturing expertise for skill development, preserving knowledge before practitioner departure, building post-incident learning artifacts, or investigating decisions in complex sociotechnical systems. Outputs structured incident reconstructions with cues, decisions, alternatives considered, and counterfactual analysis suitable for distillation into skills or training material.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, debug, optimize, and deploy ComfyUI workflows for diffusion image, video, and audio generation. Activate on: ComfyUI workflow, ComfyUI custom node, ComfyUI API, ComfyUI Manager, KSampler, FLUX in ComfyUI, Wan 2.2 ComfyUI, Hunyuan video ComfyUI, LTX video ComfyUI, IPAdapter, ControlNet ComfyUI, Kijai wrapper, ComfyDeploy, RunComfy, ComfyUI security, GGUF quantization, TeaCache, Nunchaku, ACE-Step ComfyUI, F5-TTS ComfyUI, subgraphs ComfyUI. NOT for: A1111/Forge/Invoke (different UIs), training pipelines from scratch, non-diffusion ML models, or general image-API integrations (use generative-video-2026 / generative-music-audio / media-gen-deployment).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interprets GitHub Actions run status and logs, diagnoses CI failure patterns, and suggests targeted fixes. Handles dependency install failures, test timeouts, build OOM, flaky tests, and workflow misconfigurations. Activate on: 'CI failing', 'build broken', 'workflow error', 'GitHub Actions debug', 'flaky CI', 'pipeline timeout', 'CI red'. NOT for: writing new workflows from scratch (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), CI caching strategy (use ci-cache-optimizer), deployment orchestration (use devops-automator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates shell completion scripts for CLI tools. Parses command structure from help output, commander/yargs configs, or manual specification. Produces completions for bash, zsh, and fish that follow each shell's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track the full Toulmin epistemic ancestry of every claim produced by a multi-agent swarm. Each agent output is tagged with an argument chain (claim / data / warrant / relationship) derived from SwarmTracer spans and LineageEdge records, so operators can zoom into any sub-claim and see precisely which agents asserted it, what triggered each assertion, and how contradictions propagated or were synthesised away. The SwarmTracer pattern — wrapping the SwarmAgentExecutor to capture spans, record messages, and build a lineage graph — is the concrete runtime substrate. Argumentative lineage lifts that graph into the Toulmin vocabulary so reasoning provenance is both machine-queryable and human-interpretable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building content-heavy sites with Astro, deciding between SSG/SSR/hybrid, choosing client directives (idle/visible/load/media), structuring content collections with type-safe schemas, integrating React/Vue/Solid/Svelte components in the same project, or migrating from Next.js for marketing/docs. Triggers: client:idle vs client:load tradeoffs, content collections schema with zod, image optimization via @astrojs/image, view transitions, server islands, MDX layouts. NOT for SPA-style apps that need full interactivity (use Next/Remix), Astro internals/plugin authoring, or non-content sites where islands provide no benefit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically intercepts and optimizes prompts using the prompt-learning MCP server. Learns from performance over time via embedding-indexed history. Uses APE, OPRO, DSPy patterns. Activate on "optimize prompt", "improve this prompt", "prompt engineering", or ANY complex task request. Requires prompt-learning MCP server. NOT for simple questions (just answer them), NOT for direct commands (just execute them), NOT for conversational responses (no optimization needed).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a background-job system, choosing between BullMQ / Sidekiq / RQ / Temporal / SQS, deciding queue-vs-workflow, sizing concurrency vs rate limits, building dead-letter queues, or making handlers idempotent. Triggers: jobs running twice on retry, lost jobs after worker crash, DLQ filling up, Redis OOM from job backlog, exactly-once requested, "do we need Temporal?", visibility timeout / lockDuration confusion, exponential backoff vs jitter, fan-out fan-in workflows. NOT for outbound webhook publishing (different concerns), receiver-side webhook handling (different concerns), event-streaming/Kafka topology, or in-process async (event loop only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an individual agent's belief, goal, intention, and reconsideration model. Use when specifying autonomous decision state, commitment policy, or recovery from failed plans. NOT for AgentSpeak interpreter mechanics, organization modeling, normative conflicts, or multi-agent execution waves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or review a declared control-command profile and its verb/backend lifecycle matrix. Distinguish policy denial, unsupported capability, delivery acknowledgement, independently observed effect, and unknown outcome; bind authorization to principal, target, scope, current policy, expiry, and fencing epoch. NOT for claiming runtime correctness, proving an adapter from declarations, or approving a control-panel button without independent runtime evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install Port Daddy's bounded interactive coordination hooks ("tentacles", from the Giant Squid Harness) into the INTERACTIVE sessions of agentic coding CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Antigravity/agy) by auto-detecting which CLIs are installed and writing PER-PROJECT hook config behind a runtime gate, so coordination fires only inside a Port Daddy project while the daemon is running — never machine- wide-always-on. Use when the user says "install port daddy hooks", "agent CLI hooks", "interactive session hooks", "make coordination hooks fire in interactive sessions", "codex/gemini/agy hooks", or "auto-detect agent CLIs". NOT for generic software/package installation; NOT for installing the Port Daddy daemon or `pd` CLI itself (delegate to the `port-daddy` skill / `pd setup`); NOT for MCP server setup (delegate to `pd mcp install`); NOT for authoring new skills (delegate to `skill-architect` / `skill-creator`); NOT for editing the tentacle scripts themselves (owned by the Giant Squid Harness program; this installer layer is pd-adr-090).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download audio recordings from Coval voice simulations. Use when user wants to listen to or analyze call recordings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a compact Coval test set from product requirements, observed conversation failures or a coverage gap. Design realistic scenarios with separate expected behaviors, provenance and controlled voice/persona variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。