2,235 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Keep TypeScript and Python SDK behavior, generated client usage, public API naming, and docs examples aligned. Use when a change affects both SDKs, when generated client pins move, when comparing TS/Python behavior, or when a backend API contract changed. Do not use for single-language internal-only changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hypothesis-driven debugging methodology for hard bugs. Use this skill whenever you're investigating non-trivial bugs, unexpected behavior, flaky tests, or tracing issues through complex systems. Activate proactively when debugging requires more than a quick glance — especially when the first attempt at a fix didn't work, when behavior seems "impossible", or when you're tempted to blame an external system (model, API, library) without evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, measure, and evolve company culture as operational behavior — not wall posters. Covers mission/vision/values workshops, values-to-behaviors translation, culture code creation, culture health assessment, and cultural rituals by stage. Use when building company values, assessing culture health, designing cultural rituals, creating culture codes, handling culture clashes, or when user mentions culture, values, culture debt, founder culture, or culture code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when changing shared upstream-owned files to add Kilo-specific behavior, editing `kilocode_change` markers in shared code, or moving additive behavior out of shared code to reduce upstream merge conflicts. Do not use for changes confined to Kilo-owned paths such as `packages/kilo-vscode/` or `packages/kilo-ui/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnosis loop for bugs and failing behavior. Use when asked to debug or fix failing or slow behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to roll Kortix PRODUCTION back to an older already-released version — the inverse of a release. Covers the one-dispatch rollback-prod.yml engine, the per-surface mechanics (API + gateway = ECS Fargate image-tag swap; frontend = Vercel promote), the all-important Vercel frontend behavior (why a backend-only push can 'clobber' a FE rollback, and the 'don't rebuild the FE for backend-only pushes' skip that fixes it), the DB/migration-drift safety check that is the real blocker, and how a later promote returns prod to latest. Load WHENEVER the user wants to roll back / revert / downgrade / 'go back a version' on prod, asks how the rollback or the frontend clobber/skip behavior works, or needs to run rollback-prod.yml. Pairs with kortix-release (the forward direction).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Customize macOS SwiftUI windows and scene behavior. Use when tuning window chrome, drag regions, placement, restoration, launch behavior, or borderless windows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, debug, balance, or test combat enemy AI for playable action games. Use for aggro, target selection, navigation, spacing, attack choices, telegraphs, retreats, boss behavior, behavior-state machines, and deterministic AI regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pseudo-mutation analysis ONLY: answer whether tests would catch a bug if production code changed, which meaningful changes would still pass, or which caller-visible mutations existing assertions would miss; verify candidates when requested, then optionally close verified gaps. Includes explicit read-only per-test composition for grading. Activate for behavioral blind spots tied to production behavior. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite taxonomy, metadata, or distribution reports (test-tagging); .NET line-vs-branch or Cobertura interpretation, arithmetic, plateaus, project-wide coverage gaps, or coverage-backed test/CRAP priorities (coverage-analysis; use native coverage tooling outside .NET); named-target CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; or mutation tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely refactors C#/.NET code without changing behavior. USE FOR any request to refactor, rename, move, extract, inline, merge, consolidate, deduplicate, split, or modernize C# code, including partial/generated declarations, wrappers, public APIs, serialization/reflection/configuration names, friend assemblies, conditional compilation, and multi-targeted projects. Also use when a request calls a feature, bug fix, package/framework upgrade, or public nullability change a refactor and the behavior-changing part must be separated or declined. DO NOT USE FOR ordinary feature or bug fixes not presented as refactoring; standalone upgrades after reclassification (use dotnet-upgrade); adding tests; or formatting-only work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Weave router locally in docker compose and drive it with `claude -p` to reproduce and verify routing/translation behavior for a specific upstream model (e.g. GLM-5.1, DeepSeek, Qwen). Use when verifying a router fix end-to-end, reproducing a prod routing bug, confirming a model's streaming behavior (nudges, tool-call suppression, loop/no-progress breaks), or testing a `/force-model` route — without touching the user's global Claude Code config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Weave router locally in docker compose and drive it with `codex exec` to reproduce and verify routing/translation/marker behavior for Codex's Responses API path. Use when verifying a router fix end-to-end for Codex, reproducing a prod Codex routing bug, confirming routing-marker / force-model / subscription-passthrough behavior, or testing a `/force-model` route — without touching the user's global Codex config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one unattended IDEATION iteration of the quality-assurance loop — find the highest-value untested behavior in the codebase, judge it against the QA value bar, and file ONE locked `qa` issue specifying the test to write. Never writes code or tests; the next-qa skill builds from the queue this skill fills. Use when the user says "QAアイデア", "next qa idea", or wants the QA backlog refilled without implementation.
Hunt shadow / zombie / undocumented API surface (OWASP API9 Improper Inventory Management) — enumerate the full API version history (v1/v2/beta/legacy paths, header- and subdomain-based versioning), pull and diff every reachable OpenAPI/Swagger spec (including ones only findable via the Wayback Machine), and behaviorally diff old vs. current versions for auth/rate-limit/validation regressions rather than just response-shape differences. Distinct from hunt-api-misconfig, which owns exploitation once you have a spec or endpoint (mass assignment, JWT, OData, Swagger-chain attacks); distinct from hunt-subdomain, which owns host-level discovery. This skill owns the version-inventory and behavioral-diff workflow itself. Use when the target has versioned API paths, multiple specs, a changelog referencing deprecated endpoints, or a mobile app whose hardcoded backend calls look older than the current web app's.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep code, tests, documentation, configuration, and other changes as tight, clear, performant, and minimal as possible without weakening behavior. Use during implementation to prevent unnecessary complexity, after behavior is proven to consolidate working changes, before handoff for a full branch audit, and when asked to simplify, tighten, clean up, reduce verbosity, remove complexity, or minimize existing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opt-in evidence-first causal diagnosis for bugs, browser or app/device failures, flaky behavior, and performance regressions. Activate only when the user explicitly invokes `$diagnose` or explicitly asks to use the named diagnose skill. Do not activate merely because the user mentions a bug, asks why something failed, requests debugging or a fix, or describes unexpected behavior. Once explicitly invoked, locate likely causes, instrument relevant boundaries with extensive structured logging, reproduce the issue, analyze the collected logs, rank causes with confidence scores, and pursue 100% operational confidence while probes can increase confidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Messy or AI-generated code to clean up: delete AI-generated slop, dead code, and duplication while observable behavior stays identical. Use when the user says: ai-slop-cleaner, cleanup, deslop, refactor, risky, behavior-preserving refactor, risk analysis, refactor workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review closed trades, partial exits, and monthly trade aggregates for process adherence, risk discipline, execution quality, and evidence-based trading behavior patterns. Use after trader-memory-core and signal-postmortem have produced records, or when the user asks for a post-trade coach, risk-manager style review, rule-adherence review, next-session operating rules, or psychology-aware trading behavior feedback. This skill does not provide buy/sell advice, therapy, or broker execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix retention problems using behavior design (B=MAP). Use when the user mentions "users sign up but dont stick around", "activation rate", "onboarding friction", "retention metrics", "why users dont complete", "churn analysis", or "aha moment". Also trigger when analyzing cohort retention curves, designing activation milestones, reducing time-to-value for new users, or investigating why users quit after their first session. Covers the Ability Chain, prompt design, and tiny behaviors that compound. For habit loops and variable rewards, see hooked-ux. For intrinsic motivation, see drive-motivation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds the root cause of a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fix. Use this whenever something is broken and the cause is not yet proven — a failing test, a production error, intermittent behavior, or a symptom that appeared after a change. Also use when a fix has been attempted and did not work, or when the same bug keeps coming back.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies decision science and cognitive bias research to marketing and product decisions — how people actually choose under uncertainty, and how framing, defaults, sequencing, and social context change behavior. Use this to diagnose why a well-argued offer is not converting, to structure choices and pricing presentation, to design an experience around how attention and memory work, or to pressure-test whether a persuasion tactic is legitimate or manipulative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when oTP behaviors including gen_server for stateful processes, gen_statem for state machines, supervisors for fault tolerance, gen_event for event handling, and building robust, production-ready Erlang applications with proven patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bug condition/postcondition formalization as testable Behavior Contracts. Defines invariants that must be preserved across fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Guide structured debugging before code changes by clarifying expected behavior, reproducing issues, identifying likely root causes, and agreeing on a fix plan with validation steps. Use when users ask to debug bugs, investigate regressions, triage incidents, diagnose failing behavior, handle failing tests, analyze production incidents, investigate error spikes, or run root cause analysis (RCA).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。