146 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Prepare for fundraising due diligence — runs CTO, CFO, CPO, sales, and codebase health reviews to produce a consolidated investor brief with scorecard, red flags, and strengths. Use before Series A, seed round, acqui-hire evaluation, or board presentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[user] Business Legal Counsel / CLO level contract drafting, review, and legal risk assessment. Handles domestic Chinese contracts (中文), cross-border contracts, and offshore international contracts in Chinese and English. Jurisdictions: PRC law (Civil Code, Company Law, Anti-Unfair Competition Law), US law (UCC, common law), Hong Kong law (common law, HK ordinances). Combines relevant laws, regulations, and litigation case precedents in contract analysis. Generates Word (.docx) files with track changes and persuasive margin comments for contract review markup. Use when user mentions contracts, legal review, contract drafting, legal risk assessment, NDA, agreement, 合同, 法律, 审核, 起草, 合同审查, 法务, legal negotiation, due diligence, 尽职调查, 风险评估, 条款谈判, 反不正当竞争, or any contract-related task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarizes raw background check data into structured executive reports with risk categorization (GREEN/YELLOW/RED). Use when processing criminal records, court filings, employment/education verification, sanctions screening, or adverse media for pre-employment screening, executive due diligence, or investment-grade investigations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an enforcement-aware Animal Welfare Act compliance audit for USDA/APHIS-regulated facilities. Maps Form 7002 inspection citations to verified 9 C.F.R. Parts 1-3 requirements, analyzes NCI severity and recurrence patterns, evaluates core compliance programs (PVC, IACUC, housing, records, transport), and outputs a prioritized corrective action plan with proof artifacts. Use when auditing AWA compliance, reviewing USDA inspection reports, preparing for license renewal, conducting diligence, or assessing enforcement risk. Trigger: Animal Welfare Act, AWA, USDA, APHIS, Form 7002, IACUC, PVC, exhibitor, dealer, research facility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
法律尽职调查·撰写交易导向的12章法律尽调报告（含ESG专章）·触发：法律尽调、尽调报告、DD、尽调
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess the reliability of companies and individuals through Openapi Risk - credit scores, CRIF reports, patrimonial reports, negative events, heirs reports, worldwide KYC (PEP, sanction lists, adverse media). Use for due diligence, creditworthiness, AML/KYC questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads one export transaction, order or shipment description and returns a DRAFT export review pack: parties to screen with a screening checklist, an item classification worksheet, a red-flag review, licence-determination questions and open items. Use when the user asks to "prepare the export review for this order", "pre-check this shipment for export control", "who do we need to screen on this deal", "build the classification worksheet for this item" or "assemble the trade-compliance file for this technology transfer". Do not use for vendor security or due-diligence screening of a supplier's questionnaire answers; use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead. Never classifies, screens, clears, decides licence need or releases a shipment; trade compliance does. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts answers to the questions in a received RFP, RFQ or tender from the organisation's past responses, answer library, case studies, policies and other documents provided: one row per buyer question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted or Missing, its source and date, and a legal or pricing review flag on every answer touching terms, liability, warranties, insurance, data protection or price. Use when the user asks to "draft our RFP response", "answer this tender from our past proposals", "pre-fill the bid questions", "first pass at the RFQ answers" or "reuse our previous bid content". Do not use for writing the buyer's own RFP or requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for security or due diligence questionnaires use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill; for scoring received supplier responses use rfp-comparison-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-fills a customer's or prospect's security or third-party risk questionnaire from the organisation's own answer sources (prior questionnaires, answer library, policies), returning one row per question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted, Missing or Routed, its source, date, scope match and owner, plus the Missing list by owner. Never invents an answer, certification or control and never submits. Use when the user asks to "pre-fill this security questionnaire", "take a first pass at the customer's due diligence form", "answer this vendor assessment from our previous responses", "populate the third-party risk questionnaire" or "which questions can we reuse answers for". Do not use for screening a vendor's own answers, use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead; for RFP or tender answers use rfp-response-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Turn findings into a defensible intelligence product — BLUF key judgements, standardised estimative probability language, per-claim sourcing with timestamps and archived copies, separated observation, inference and assessment,… Use when writing an intelligence report, due-diligence memo, evidence pack or executive summary, or when asked to write up an investigation so it survives challenge
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Corporate due-diligence workflow — resolve a brand or website to its registered legal entity, map group structure and beneficial ownership, profile officers and directors, enumerate the digital estate, and screen litigation, insolvency,… Use when asked to check out, vet or research a company, verify a supplier or counterparty before signing or paying, or assess whether a business is real
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Entry point for open-source intelligence, investigation and verification work. Use when asked to investigate, research, verify, vet, check out, look up, background-check, trace, attribute or find someone or something; when a request involves due diligence, KYC or KYB, counterparty or vendor risk, sanctions and PEP screening, AML, fraud, business email compromise
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- КАК ДЕЛАЕТСЯ ФАНДРЕЙЗИНГ - общий плейбук рейза по этапам 0-7 (подготовка и активы -> нарратив -> структура сделки -> пайплайн и momentum -> заголовки -> медиа… Триггеры: “/fundraise“, “/фандрейз“, “фандрейзинг“, “как делается фандрейзинг“, “подними раунд“, “подготовь рейз“, “питч инвестору“, “раунд как собрать“, “проверь их раунд“, “due diligence раунда“, “fundraising playbook“, “prep the raise“
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read and drive Agentic Table (magic table / due-diligence) sheets through the unique-cli agentic-table command. Use when the user or task involves an Agentic Table: inspecting a sheet's state, a cell's value or lock state, a cell's edit history or its export artifacts; writing text into a specific cell; or running the full loop — creating a sheet, importing a questionnaire and sources, waiting for the agent to answer, and exporting the result. Access is enforced per sheet by the platform and varies from sheet to sheet; a denial is reported as `agentic-table: permission denied`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about buying or selling a trucking company — valuation drivers (revenue, fleet age, CSA scores, customer concentration), asset purchase vs stock purchase, FMCSA authority transfer, due diligence checklist, common deal structures (cash, earnout, seller-financed), and what changes operationally after acquisition. Reference 49 CFR 365.401 (authority transfer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate startups, structure deals, and make investment decisions with VC frameworks and due diligence patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legal contract analysis using CUAD dataset (41 risk categories). Supports NDA, SaaS, M&A, employment, payment/merchant, and finder/broker agreements. Identifies red flags, suggests redlines, compares to market standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。