「evidence-based」の検索結果

Verify like Fable 5 — obsessive, systematic, evidence-based quality assurance woven into your reasoning. Use this skill when you have just written or modified code, need to confirm something works, are running tests, or need to validate output against requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix CJK (Korean, Japanese, Chinese) text-wrapping issues in web UIs. Systematically traces mid-syllable breaks, orphaned glyphs, and awkward line splits through a layered fix strategy covering global CSS cascade, component-library overrides, headline balancing, and translation-level phrase binding. Produces an evidence-based diagnosis and verification report before any code change is applied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a bug has multiple plausible causes across layers — competing hypotheses, validation loops, evidence-based conclusions — even when the user just says 'why is this happening?'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning the migration of a legacy system or monolith — analyzes the source codebase (current repo, or a repo URL cloned to a temp dir) and produces an evidence-based Strangler Fig migration plan with per-domain SPECs. Default target is .NET (Blazor WebAssembly, .NET MAUI, ASP.NET Core); other stacks allowed by user decision. Do NOT use to implement code or when approved SPECs already cover the migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing UI code for interface-guideline compliance (accessibility, forms, animation, images, performance, UX copy) and/or validating a deployed page against Lighthouse 95+ targets. Produces evidence-based findings (file:line + Lighthouse JSON) and turns confirmed pendencies into Draft SPECs via write-specs. Do NOT use to design/build UI from scratch (use design) or to fix findings inline — fixes go through the SPEC pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standard Operating Procedures for read-only codebase exploration, symbol search, dependency mapping, code tracing, code review, architecture analysis, technical research, source evaluation, and evidence-based reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coaching hypothesis-driven debugging that requires the learner to gather evidence and reason about root causes before applying fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brutally honest AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md review backed by real A/B test evidence. Not just opinions — actual proof that your rules are dead weight. Roasts instruction files for bloat, slop, and redundancy, then proves it by running evals. Use when user says "roast my agents.md", "roast my CLAUDE.md", "prove my rules are useless", "eval roast", or wants entertaining evidence-based feedback on their AI config files. Also triggers on "audit my instructions" or "are my rules helping".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MBSR fundamentals, body scan, and breathing exercises. Evidence-based mindfulness techniques according to Jon Kabat-Zinn for everyday life.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a senior documentation engineer that generates comprehensive technical documentation pages with evidence-based depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Busabase-backed sales prospecting and first-touch outreach desk with a bundled Hono App-in-Skill deployable to AirApp. Use whenever the user invokes $kelly-sales-outreach or /kelly-sales-outreach, wants to enter a product or service and discover its ideal customers, asks to continuously find target accounts or public business contacts, needs evidence-based ICP scoring and personalized outreach drafts, or wants to review and send cold outreach safely. Four subcommands - setup, profile, research, send - plus the desk itself. Every first-touch message requires human approval; one company receives one initial email; guessed addresses, purchased lists, secret exposure, automated spam, and unreviewed external sends are forbidden.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose repository and PWDEV Flow health without changing the project. Use when the user asks for a health check, workspace consistency check, dependency assessment, readiness report, or evidence-based scorecard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a driver or carrier asks about trucker mental health — depression, isolation, stress, fatigue, suicide risk, addiction, EAP programs, or wellness benefits. Covers evidence-based programs, hotlines, carrier-side EAP design, and how mental health affects safety and retention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing recommendation letters, reference letters, or award nominations for students, postdocs, or colleagues. Invoke when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy, comparative statements, or evidence-based character assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[21] UNDERSTAND. Deep research workflow for this project using 150% scope (100% core + 50% boundary), evidence-based reasoning, and structured investigation notes. Use when the task requires investigation, root-cause analysis, or mapping unknown areas. Always maintain a research log file that captures findings, hypotheses, and next branches; use web.run when external verification is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and fix production errors from Sentry crash reports. Use when investigating AppHang, ANR, crashes, or production errors. Includes complete workflow from JSON analysis to bug fix implementation with evidence-based methodology. Triggers on sentry, crash, AppHang, ANR, error analysis, production error, bug analysis, crash report, freeze, hang, not responding, stacktrace, breadcrumbs, exception.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewer comments arrive and each one needs a tracked decision, when a revise and resubmit letter must map every comment to a manuscript change, or when contradictory reviewer demands need evidence-based, editor-facing framing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。