「owasp」の検索結果

Deploys Llama Guard 3 safety classification, NeMo Guardrails programmable dialogue rails, and LLM Guard input/output scanner pipelines as complementary runtime defenses that inspect and constrain LLM prompts and responses. Use when adding a production runtime safety layer to an LLM, RAG, or agent application to block jailbreaks, prompt injection (OWASP LLM01), toxic content, or sensitive-data leakage before it reaches or leaves the model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovering and accessing unprotected pages, APIs, and administrative interfaces by enumerating URLs and bypassing authentication controls during authorized security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse Apache and Nginx access logs to detect SQL injection attempts, local file inclusion, directory traversal, web scanner fingerprints, and brute-force patterns. Uses regex-based pattern matching against OWASP attack signatures, GeoIP enrichment for source attribution, and statistical anomaly detection for request frequency and response size outliers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to perform security audits, penetration testing, vulnerability scanning, OWASP Top 10 checks, or offensive security assessments. Covers static analysis, dependency scanning, secret detection, API security testing, and pen test report generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit expert for OWASP Top 10, CVE analysis, code review, and penetration testing methodology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security auditing for code, configs, and infrastructure. Use when the user wants to audit or improve security: scan for vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, command injection, path traversal), detect hardcoded secrets and credentials, review auth and authorization, check dependencies for known CVEs, audit config files for insecure defaults, or generate security reports. Trigger on "security audit", "vulnerability scan", "code review for security", "find secrets", "check for vulnerabilities", "OWASP", "CVE", or questions about code security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation frameworks; analyzing coverage gaps; performance testing with k6 or Artillery; security testing with OWASP methods; debugging flaky tests; or working on QA, regression, test automation, quality gates, shift-left testing, or test maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rapid security assessment focused on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

安全校验关卡。自动扫描代码安全漏洞，检测危险模式，确保安全决策有文档记录。当用户提到安全扫描、漏洞检测、安全审计、代码安全、OWASP、注入检测、敏感信息泄露时使用。在新建模块、安全相关变更、攻防任务、重构完成时自动触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM application red-teaming — prompt injection (direct + indirect), jailbreak, system-prompt leak, data exfiltration, guardrail bypass, multi-turn crescendo, cross-lingual + cipher + invisible-unicode token smuggling, excessive agency / tool abuse, insecure output handling. Canonical OWASP LLM Top 10 + ASI01-ASI10 mapping. Use when a target exposes a chat/completions/assistant/copilot endpoint, an AI feature that consumes user text or documents, or any /v1/chat, /api/chat, /mcp surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt shadow / zombie / undocumented API surface (OWASP API9 Improper Inventory Management) — enumerate the full API version history (v1/v2/beta/legacy paths, header- and subdomain-based versioning), pull and diff every reachable OpenAPI/Swagger spec (including ones only findable via the Wayback Machine), and behaviorally diff old vs. current versions for auth/rate-limit/validation regressions rather than just response-shape differences. Distinct from hunt-api-misconfig, which owns exploitation once you have a spec or endpoint (mass assignment, JWT, OData, Swagger-chain attacks); distinct from hunt-subdomain, which owns host-level discovery. This skill owns the version-inventory and behavioral-diff workflow itself. Use when the target has versioned API paths, multiple specs, a changelog referencing deprecated endpoints, or a mobile app whose hardcoded backend calls look older than the current web app's.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt vector-store / embedding-layer weaknesses in RAG pipelines (OWASP LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses) — persistent corpus poisoning that survives across sessions and users (distinct from one-shot indirect prompt injection, which is owned by hunt-llm-ai), cross-tenant vector-database IDOR (unauthenticated or unscoped queries against Pinecone/Weaviate/Chroma/Milvus/Qdrant/pgvector), source-text/metadata leakage in similarity-search results, and retrieval-hijack via adversarial embedding proximity ('SEO poisoning' for RAG). Targets: any app with a shared knowledge base, document upload feeding a chatbot, or a directly reachable vector-DB port. Validate: a second, clean session/account must inherit a poisoned result, or a cross-tenant artifact must be independently verifiable — confabulation is not a finding, same bar as hunt-llm-ai. Use when target is RAG-backed, exposes a vector-DB port, or lets users upload documents that other users' queries later retrieve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt LLM/AI feature bugs — prompt injection, indirect injection, exfiltration via tool-use/markdown, ASCII smuggling, agentic AI security (OWASP Agentic Apps 2026, ASI01-ASI10). Patterns: direct injection ('ignore previous instructions'), indirect injection via documents/web pages/email the model reads, ASCII smuggling (Unicode Tags block U+E0000-U+E007F, invisible to humans, decoded by the model), tool-use exfiltration (model has fetch/browse tool, attacker injects OOB URL, model exfils chat history/secrets), markdown-image zero-click exfil, system-prompt extraction, IDOR-via-AI (cross-tenant data). Targets: chatbots, RAG, summarizers, agentic copilots, MCP tools. Detection: any LLM-backed endpoint, doc upload triggering AI processing, autonomous agent with tools. Validate: OOB/Collaborator callback for exfil, verbatim-reproducible system-prompt leak (run twice), verifiable cross-tenant leak or RCE. Confabulation is NOT a finding. Use when hunting AI features, chatbots, RAG, agentic systems, MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks", "review access control weaknesses", "analyze API security issues", "assess security misconfigurations", "understand client-side vulnerabilities", "examine mobile and IoT security flaws", or "reference the OWASP-aligned vulnerability taxonomy". Use this skill to provide comprehensive vulnerability definitions, root causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies across all major web security categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP compliance, vulnerability scanning, and adversarial red team testing — use for security reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Default code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks. Do not use as the primary route for dedicated OWASP/security audits, review-feedback handling, completion verification, AI-code cleanup, or TDD/test-first work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web+AI 安全测试知识库。融合 WooYun 88,636 案例 + 先知 L1-L4 方法论 + GAARM 150 风险 + OWASP Top 10 (LLM/ASI/WSTG)。 TRIGGER when 任务是实战安全测试：渗透测试、漏洞挖掘/利用、红队攻防、安全审计 (SAST/DAST)、 CTF、AI/LLM 安全测试 (Prompt 注入/越狱/MCP/Agent/沙箱逃逸)。用户明确给出测试目标 (URL/代码/模型/Agent 架构) 且意图是"测试/审计/挖漏洞/利用"。 DO NOT trigger: - 安全概念讨论（"什么是 XSS"、"SQL 注入原理是什么"）→ 普通问答 - 非安全性质的 code review / debug / 性能优化 → code-audit-skill 或其他 - 修复语法错误 / 业务逻辑 bug → 普通编程协助 - 纯 Web 白盒代码审计（完整项目目录 / Source-Sink 污点分析）→ code-audit-skill - 仅引用 CVE 编号查文档 → WebSearch 边界细则: CTF 短代码片段 + 利用思路 → 本 Skill；完整项目目录 + 系统白盒审计 → code-audit-skill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sonnet Amplified fullstack engine. 34 modes, SEC-01~15 OWASP security, 13 runtime hooks, 75% token reduction. Install: npx @smorky85/aurakit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep security audit covering OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data protection, dependency vulnerabilities, and secrets scanning. Delegates to the Centinela (QA) agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。